All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests XFS: verify extended attributes after multi-stream xfsdump/xfsrestore
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:21:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <525414D9.10308@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52535864.8020503@sandeen.net>

On 10/07/2013 07:57 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 10/7/13 7:53 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> Two tests, please. move all the common parts into common/dump, and
>> write them as two separate tests. That way we can easily track what
>> test is failing just by looking at what harness test is failing...
>
> I'm not quite convinced that it's 2 separate tests, TBH.
>
> It's the same root cause; I guess there is a slightly different
> outcome because if you hit the same root cause enough times,
> you'll segfault.


Multiple DMF offline files are successfully restored but the attrs are 
lost. I wanted to show/test that case.

I agree with Eric that it is the same  root cause but because can occur 
with successful dumps and does not segfault,  Thats why the 2 tests.

> That's the only difference in test #2.
> (and the segfault isn't fixed AFAIK).

Agreed and I will note that in the test description.

>
> -Eric
>

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-10-08 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-01 16:30 [PATCH] xfsrestore: fix multi stream support Rich Johnston
2013-10-01 20:47 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-01 21:39   ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-01 22:02     ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-02  3:57       ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-02  4:17         ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-02  4:26       ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-02 18:41 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-02 20:03   ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-02 20:13     ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-03 13:40       ` Rich Johnston
     [not found] ` <20131003212114.493910914@sgi.com>
2013-10-03 22:11   ` [PATCH] xfsdump: handle large, wholly-sparse files Eric Sandeen
2013-10-03 23:11 ` [PATCH V2] " Rich Johnston
2013-10-03 23:16   ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-07 19:38 ` [PATCH] xfstests XFS: verify extended attributes after multi-stream xfsdump/xfsrestore rjohnston
2013-10-07 20:32   ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-07 20:54     ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-07 21:00       ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-08  0:53   ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-08  0:57     ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-08  0:58       ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-08 14:21       ` Rich Johnston [this message]
2013-10-08 19:27         ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-08 19:57           ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-08  1:08   ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-08 14:22     ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-08 14:43 ` [PATCH V2] xfstests XFS: verify extended attributes after multi-stream xfsdump/xfsrestore are not lost rjohnston

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=525414D9.10308@sgi.com \
    --to=rjohnston@sgi.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.