[RFC] Create meta-sdr in meta-oe

[RFC] Create meta-sdr in meta-oe

[Philip Balister]

At the GNU Radio conference last week, several people working with
gnuradio on embedded systems asked about creating a meta-sdr to hold
gnuradio and uhd. This would be the starting point for adding some other
gnuradio out of tree applications. This could also be a home for some
other sdr frameworks such as Iris and ALOE.

Software that is more focused toward the amateur radio community should
not end up here since there is little overlap in the developer
communities at this time.

Any comments?

Philip

Re: [RFC] Create meta-sdr in meta-oe

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 10-10-13 20:34, Philip Balister schreef:
> At the GNU Radio conference last week, several people working with 
> gnuradio on embedded systems asked about creating a meta-sdr to hold 
> gnuradio and uhd. This would be the starting point for adding some other 
> gnuradio out of tree applications. This could also be a home for some 
> other sdr frameworks such as Iris and ALOE.
> 
> Software that is more focused toward the amateur radio community should 
> not end up here since there is little overlap in the developer 
> communities at this time.
> 
> Any comments?

soft66 and rtl-sdr can live there as well. I have recipes for that :)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iD4DBQFSVvafMkyGM64RGpERAv9hAJYp+P+siykamukuuYphpOhVyNxjAKCqbHy/
R4h7IGNilTjmyAhRm/AH6Q==
=HwTP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [RFC] Create meta-sdr in meta-oe

[Denys Dmytriyenko]

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 08:49:03PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Op 10-10-13 20:34, Philip Balister schreef:
> > At the GNU Radio conference last week, several people working with 
> > gnuradio on embedded systems asked about creating a meta-sdr to hold 
> > gnuradio and uhd. This would be the starting point for adding some other 
> > gnuradio out of tree applications. This could also be a home for some 
> > other sdr frameworks such as Iris and ALOE.
> > 
> > Software that is more focused toward the amateur radio community should 
> > not end up here since there is little overlap in the developer 
> > communities at this time.
> > 
> > Any comments?
> 
> soft66 and rtl-sdr can live there as well. I have recipes for that :)

I like both proposals. The only question is which is better placements - an 
own repo and a layer, or just another sub-layer in meta-openembedded repo?

-- 
Denys