* Yocto Project 1.5_M5.rc6
@ 2013-10-08 22:35 Flanagan, Elizabeth
2013-10-10 21:37 ` Christian Gagneraud
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Flanagan, Elizabeth @ 2013-10-08 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yocto@yoctoproject.org, Otavio Salvador, Zhao Yi,
Alexandru C Georgescu
All,
The final release candidate for the upcoming Yocto Project 1.5 (dora 10.0.0)
release is now available for testing at:
http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/releases/1.5_M5.rc6
poky 102bf5e0f640fe85068452a42b85077f1c81e0c9
eclipse-poky-juno 2fa1c58940141a3c547c8790b8a6832167e8eb66
eclipse-poky-kepler ad74249895f882a8f00bdeef7a0f7c18998cc43e
meta-fsl-arm d334d3c7388e41d720dd0c8e0cb76fab51a6e46a
meta-fsl-ppc 25ee629b826a138ef407c113f776830e5d822c01
meta-intel a1138af21f6ba85e79d1422a3f0a3e0c4f658a90
meta-minnow ad469d78a1f56abd3b7d5103f1e0344cb10684b1
meta-qt3 b73552fb998fd30a01dbee5a172e432a16078222
Please begin the QA cycle. Thanks!
--
Elizabeth Flanagan
Yocto Project
Build and Release
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Yocto Project 1.5_M5.rc6
2013-10-08 22:35 Yocto Project 1.5_M5.rc6 Flanagan, Elizabeth
@ 2013-10-10 21:37 ` Christian Gagneraud
2013-10-10 22:02 ` Jeff Osier-Mixon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Christian Gagneraud @ 2013-10-10 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Flanagan, Elizabeth, yocto@yoctoproject.org, Otavio Salvador,
Zhao Yi, Alexandru C Georgescu
On 09/10/13 11:35, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
> All,
>
> The final release candidate for the upcoming Yocto Project 1.5 (dora 10.0.0)
> release is now available for testing at:
>
> http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/releases/1.5_M5.rc6
>
> poky 102bf5e0f640fe85068452a42b85077f1c81e0c9
> eclipse-poky-juno 2fa1c58940141a3c547c8790b8a6832167e8eb66
> eclipse-poky-kepler ad74249895f882a8f00bdeef7a0f7c18998cc43e
> meta-fsl-arm d334d3c7388e41d720dd0c8e0cb76fab51a6e46a
> meta-fsl-ppc 25ee629b826a138ef407c113f776830e5d822c01
> meta-intel a1138af21f6ba85e79d1422a3f0a3e0c4f658a90
> meta-minnow ad469d78a1f56abd3b7d5103f1e0344cb10684b1
> meta-qt3 b73552fb998fd30a01dbee5a172e432a16078222
^^^
Qt3, really!?! It's so unbeleivable that I had to check if it really was
Qt3, and yes it is!!! The commit log [1] is very interesting.
Qt-3.0 was released in 2001 (linux-2.4 era), Qt-4.0 was released in 2005
(linux-2.6 era) and Qt-5.0 in Dec. 2012 (linux-3.7 release)...
Anyone fancy a meta-linux24 layer? Or maybe a meta-gcc2, or
meta-xfree86, or ...
Please excuse my sarcasm, but honestly I would prefer to see a meta-qt5
here!
Best regards,
Chris
[1] http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-qt3/log/
>
> Please begin the QA cycle. Thanks!
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Yocto Project 1.5_M5.rc6
2013-10-10 21:37 ` Christian Gagneraud
@ 2013-10-10 22:02 ` Jeff Osier-Mixon
2013-10-10 22:26 ` Christian Gagneraud
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Osier-Mixon @ 2013-10-10 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Gagneraud; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, Otavio Salvador
Hi Chris - well-intended sarcasm isn't usually a problem, but I want
to make sure to address your concerns here. We would like to see a
meta-qt5 as well but so far one has not been submitted. If you would
like to submit one, I would be happy to put you in touch with the
right maintainers who can guide you through the process.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Christian Gagneraud <chgans@gna.org> wrote:
> On 09/10/13 11:35, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> The final release candidate for the upcoming Yocto Project 1.5 (dora
>> 10.0.0)
>> release is now available for testing at:
>>
>> http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/releases/1.5_M5.rc6
>>
>> poky 102bf5e0f640fe85068452a42b85077f1c81e0c9
>> eclipse-poky-juno 2fa1c58940141a3c547c8790b8a6832167e8eb66
>> eclipse-poky-kepler ad74249895f882a8f00bdeef7a0f7c18998cc43e
>> meta-fsl-arm d334d3c7388e41d720dd0c8e0cb76fab51a6e46a
>> meta-fsl-ppc 25ee629b826a138ef407c113f776830e5d822c01
>> meta-intel a1138af21f6ba85e79d1422a3f0a3e0c4f658a90
>> meta-minnow ad469d78a1f56abd3b7d5103f1e0344cb10684b1
>> meta-qt3 b73552fb998fd30a01dbee5a172e432a16078222
>
>
> ^^^
>
> Qt3, really!?! It's so unbeleivable that I had to check if it really was
> Qt3, and yes it is!!! The commit log [1] is very interesting.
>
> Qt-3.0 was released in 2001 (linux-2.4 era), Qt-4.0 was released in 2005
> (linux-2.6 era) and Qt-5.0 in Dec. 2012 (linux-3.7 release)...
>
> Anyone fancy a meta-linux24 layer? Or maybe a meta-gcc2, or meta-xfree86, or
> ...
>
> Please excuse my sarcasm, but honestly I would prefer to see a meta-qt5
> here!
>
> Best regards,
> Chris
>
> [1] http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-qt3/log/
>
>
>>
>> Please begin the QA cycle. Thanks!
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
--
Jeff Osier-Mixon http://jefro.net/blog
Yocto Project Community Manager @Intel http://yoctoproject.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Yocto Project 1.5_M5.rc6
2013-10-10 22:02 ` Jeff Osier-Mixon
@ 2013-10-10 22:26 ` Christian Gagneraud
2013-10-11 0:01 ` Otavio Salvador
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Christian Gagneraud @ 2013-10-10 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Osier-Mixon; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, Otavio Salvador
On 11/10/13 11:02, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
> Hi Chris - well-intended sarcasm isn't usually a problem, but I want
> to make sure to address your concerns here. We would like to see a
> meta-qt5 as well but so far one has not been submitted. If you would
> like to submit one, I would be happy to put you in touch with the
> right maintainers who can guide you through the process.
Hi Jeff,
Well-intended answer! ;) But i want to make sure to address your
concerns here. I would like to see the meta-qt5 [1] in Yocto's QA
process. If you would like to integrate it, I would be happy to put you
in touch with the right maintainers who can guide you through the process.
Chris.
[1] https://github.com/meta-qt5
--
Cheeky Chris
Random community dude @nocompany
http://catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Christian Gagneraud <chgans@gna.org> wrote:
>> On 09/10/13 11:35, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> The final release candidate for the upcoming Yocto Project 1.5 (dora
>>> 10.0.0)
>>> release is now available for testing at:
>>>
>>> http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/releases/1.5_M5.rc6
>>>
>>> poky 102bf5e0f640fe85068452a42b85077f1c81e0c9
>>> eclipse-poky-juno 2fa1c58940141a3c547c8790b8a6832167e8eb66
>>> eclipse-poky-kepler ad74249895f882a8f00bdeef7a0f7c18998cc43e
>>> meta-fsl-arm d334d3c7388e41d720dd0c8e0cb76fab51a6e46a
>>> meta-fsl-ppc 25ee629b826a138ef407c113f776830e5d822c01
>>> meta-intel a1138af21f6ba85e79d1422a3f0a3e0c4f658a90
>>> meta-minnow ad469d78a1f56abd3b7d5103f1e0344cb10684b1
>>> meta-qt3 b73552fb998fd30a01dbee5a172e432a16078222
>>
>>
>> ^^^
>>
>> Qt3, really!?! It's so unbeleivable that I had to check if it really was
>> Qt3, and yes it is!!! The commit log [1] is very interesting.
>>
>> Qt-3.0 was released in 2001 (linux-2.4 era), Qt-4.0 was released in 2005
>> (linux-2.6 era) and Qt-5.0 in Dec. 2012 (linux-3.7 release)...
>>
>> Anyone fancy a meta-linux24 layer? Or maybe a meta-gcc2, or meta-xfree86, or
>> ...
>>
>> Please excuse my sarcasm, but honestly I would prefer to see a meta-qt5
>> here!
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Chris
>>
>> [1] http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-qt3/log/
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Please begin the QA cycle. Thanks!
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> yocto mailing list
>> yocto@yoctoproject.org
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Yocto Project 1.5_M5.rc6
2013-10-10 22:26 ` Christian Gagneraud
@ 2013-10-11 0:01 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-10-11 0:31 ` Jeff Osier-Mixon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Otavio Salvador @ 2013-10-11 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Gagneraud; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Christian Gagneraud <chgans@gna.org> wrote:
> On 11/10/13 11:02, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
>>
>> Hi Chris - well-intended sarcasm isn't usually a problem, but I want
>> to make sure to address your concerns here. We would like to see a
>> meta-qt5 as well but so far one has not been submitted. If you would
>> like to submit one, I would be happy to put you in touch with the
>> right maintainers who can guide you through the process.
>
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Well-intended answer! ;) But i want to make sure to address your concerns
> here. I would like to see the meta-qt5 [1] in Yocto's QA process. If you
> would like to integrate it, I would be happy to put you in touch with the
> right maintainers who can guide you through the process.
>
> Chris.
>
> [1] https://github.com/meta-qt5
Hey, this was even easier.
I am one of meta-qt5 maintainers and I am sure Martin will be more
than happy to get it into the QA process. Jeff ... this was easy :-)
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Yocto Project 1.5_M5.rc6
2013-10-11 0:01 ` Otavio Salvador
@ 2013-10-11 0:31 ` Jeff Osier-Mixon
2013-10-11 1:45 ` Saul Wold
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Osier-Mixon @ 2013-10-11 0:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Otavio Salvador; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Game, set, and match! This is also why I don't play golf!
There are many layers I would love to see in the YP QA process and I
would count meta-qt5 in the top priority. However, we only have so
many resources, so we have to focus on the core right now. I'd be
happy to talk offline about finding ways to locate new resources.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Otavio Salvador
<otavio@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Christian Gagneraud <chgans@gna.org> wrote:
>> On 11/10/13 11:02, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Chris - well-intended sarcasm isn't usually a problem, but I want
>>> to make sure to address your concerns here. We would like to see a
>>> meta-qt5 as well but so far one has not been submitted. If you would
>>> like to submit one, I would be happy to put you in touch with the
>>> right maintainers who can guide you through the process.
>>
>>
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> Well-intended answer! ;) But i want to make sure to address your concerns
>> here. I would like to see the meta-qt5 [1] in Yocto's QA process. If you
>> would like to integrate it, I would be happy to put you in touch with the
>> right maintainers who can guide you through the process.
>>
>> Chris.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/meta-qt5
>
> Hey, this was even easier.
>
> I am one of meta-qt5 maintainers and I am sure Martin will be more
> than happy to get it into the QA process. Jeff ... this was easy :-)
>
> --
> Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
> http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
--
Jeff Osier-Mixon http://jefro.net/blog
Yocto Project Community Manager @Intel http://yoctoproject.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Yocto Project 1.5_M5.rc6
2013-10-11 0:31 ` Jeff Osier-Mixon
@ 2013-10-11 1:45 ` Saul Wold
2013-10-11 1:55 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-10-11 1:56 ` Christian Gagneraud
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Saul Wold @ 2013-10-11 1:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Osier-Mixon; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, Otavio Salvador
Sorry for the top post here. The real reason we still have Qt3 is
because it's required part of the LSB spec. OE-Core contains Qt4 and we
know that meta-qt5 exists from Otavio and Martin.
I know that Richard and Paul have been watching what's going on with
meta-qt5.
Sau!
On 10/10/2013 05:31 PM, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
> Game, set, and match! This is also why I don't play golf!
>
> There are many layers I would love to see in the YP QA process and I
> would count meta-qt5 in the top priority. However, we only have so
> many resources, so we have to focus on the core right now. I'd be
> happy to talk offline about finding ways to locate new resources.
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Otavio Salvador
> <otavio@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Christian Gagneraud <chgans@gna.org> wrote:
>>> On 11/10/13 11:02, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Chris - well-intended sarcasm isn't usually a problem, but I want
>>>> to make sure to address your concerns here. We would like to see a
>>>> meta-qt5 as well but so far one has not been submitted. If you would
>>>> like to submit one, I would be happy to put you in touch with the
>>>> right maintainers who can guide you through the process.
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Jeff,
>>>
>>> Well-intended answer! ;) But i want to make sure to address your concerns
>>> here. I would like to see the meta-qt5 [1] in Yocto's QA process. If you
>>> would like to integrate it, I would be happy to put you in touch with the
>>> right maintainers who can guide you through the process.
>>>
>>> Chris.
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/meta-qt5
>>
>> Hey, this was even easier.
>>
>> I am one of meta-qt5 maintainers and I am sure Martin will be more
>> than happy to get it into the QA process. Jeff ... this was easy :-)
>>
>> --
>> Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
>> http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br
>> Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Yocto Project 1.5_M5.rc6
2013-10-11 1:45 ` Saul Wold
@ 2013-10-11 1:55 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-10-11 2:08 ` Christian Gagneraud
2013-10-11 1:56 ` Christian Gagneraud
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Otavio Salvador @ 2013-10-11 1:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Saul Wold; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry for the top post here. The real reason we still have Qt3 is because
> it's required part of the LSB spec. OE-Core contains Qt4 and we know that
> meta-qt5 exists from Otavio and Martin.
>
> I know that Richard and Paul have been watching what's going on with
> meta-qt5.
The biggest missing feature at meta-qt5 is the lacking of toolchain
support; I am still looking for someone to sponsor me to work on this
(as it is not a small task), a critical need from my side for it or
someone step on and do it :)
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Yocto Project 1.5_M5.rc6
2013-10-11 1:45 ` Saul Wold
2013-10-11 1:55 ` Otavio Salvador
@ 2013-10-11 1:56 ` Christian Gagneraud
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Christian Gagneraud @ 2013-10-11 1:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yocto
On 11/10/13 14:45, Saul Wold wrote:
>
> Sorry for the top post here. The real reason we still have Qt3 is
> because it's required part of the LSB spec. OE-Core contains Qt4 and we
> know that meta-qt5 exists from Otavio and Martin.
Thanks for the explanation.
>
> I know that Richard and Paul have been watching what's going on with
> meta-qt5.
Good to hear.
Chris
>
> Sau!
>
> On 10/10/2013 05:31 PM, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
>> Game, set, and match! This is also why I don't play golf!
>>
>> There are many layers I would love to see in the YP QA process and I
>> would count meta-qt5 in the top priority. However, we only have so
>> many resources, so we have to focus on the core right now. I'd be
>> happy to talk offline about finding ways to locate new resources.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Otavio Salvador
>> <otavio@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Christian Gagneraud <chgans@gna.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 11/10/13 11:02, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Chris - well-intended sarcasm isn't usually a problem, but I want
>>>>> to make sure to address your concerns here. We would like to see a
>>>>> meta-qt5 as well but so far one has not been submitted. If you would
>>>>> like to submit one, I would be happy to put you in touch with the
>>>>> right maintainers who can guide you through the process.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jeff,
>>>>
>>>> Well-intended answer! ;) But i want to make sure to address your
>>>> concerns
>>>> here. I would like to see the meta-qt5 [1] in Yocto's QA process. If
>>>> you
>>>> would like to integrate it, I would be happy to put you in touch
>>>> with the
>>>> right maintainers who can guide you through the process.
>>>>
>>>> Chris.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://github.com/meta-qt5
>>>
>>> Hey, this was even easier.
>>>
>>> I am one of meta-qt5 maintainers and I am sure Martin will be more
>>> than happy to get it into the QA process. Jeff ... this was easy :-)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
>>> http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br
>>> Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Yocto Project 1.5_M5.rc6
2013-10-11 1:55 ` Otavio Salvador
@ 2013-10-11 2:08 ` Christian Gagneraud
2013-10-14 15:36 ` Georgescu, Alexandru C
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Christian Gagneraud @ 2013-10-11 2:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yocto
On 11/10/13 14:55, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry for the top post here. The real reason we still have Qt3 is because
>> it's required part of the LSB spec. OE-Core contains Qt4 and we know that
>> meta-qt5 exists from Otavio and Martin.
>>
>> I know that Richard and Paul have been watching what's going on with
>> meta-qt5.
>
> The biggest missing feature at meta-qt5 is the lacking of toolchain
> support; I am still looking for someone to sponsor me to work on this
> (as it is not a small task), a critical need from my side for it or
> someone step on and do it :)
Yes, and ideally it would be nice if this toolchain would be easy to use
with QtCreator.
Some weeks ago, I had a look at writing a Yocto plugin for QtCreator
(using Danny/Qt4), and the biggest problem was how you "activate" the
toolchain, sourcing the env setup is good when you work in a shell, but
it would be better if the toolchain comes with a machine friendly
manifest file, this would allow as well to use several yocto toolchains
(eg, for different architectures/machines) from within QtCreator.
My 2 cents.
Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Yocto Project 1.5_M5.rc6
2013-10-11 2:08 ` Christian Gagneraud
@ 2013-10-14 15:36 ` Georgescu, Alexandru C
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Georgescu, Alexandru C @ 2013-10-14 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Gagneraud, yocto@yoctoproject.org
-----Original Message-----
From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Christian Gagneraud
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 05:08
To: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] Yocto Project 1.5_M5.rc6
On 11/10/13 14:55, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry for the top post here. The real reason we still have Qt3 is
>> because it's required part of the LSB spec. OE-Core contains Qt4 and
>> we know that
>> meta-qt5 exists from Otavio and Martin.
>>
>> I know that Richard and Paul have been watching what's going on with
>> meta-qt5.
>
> The biggest missing feature at meta-qt5 is the lacking of toolchain
> support; I am still looking for someone to sponsor me to work on this
> (as it is not a small task), a critical need from my side for it or
> someone step on and do it :)
Yes, and ideally it would be nice if this toolchain would be easy to use with QtCreator.
Some weeks ago, I had a look at writing a Yocto plugin for QtCreator (using Danny/Qt4), and the biggest problem was how you "activate" the toolchain, sourcing the env setup is good when you work in a shell, but it would be better if the toolchain comes with a machine friendly manifest file, this would allow as well to use several yocto toolchains (eg, for different architectures/machines) from within QtCreator.
[Alex] Just an FYI, the current Eclipse Plugin has multiple profile support.
My 2 cents.
Chris
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-10-14 15:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-10-08 22:35 Yocto Project 1.5_M5.rc6 Flanagan, Elizabeth
2013-10-10 21:37 ` Christian Gagneraud
2013-10-10 22:02 ` Jeff Osier-Mixon
2013-10-10 22:26 ` Christian Gagneraud
2013-10-11 0:01 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-10-11 0:31 ` Jeff Osier-Mixon
2013-10-11 1:45 ` Saul Wold
2013-10-11 1:55 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-10-11 2:08 ` Christian Gagneraud
2013-10-14 15:36 ` Georgescu, Alexandru C
2013-10-11 1:56 ` Christian Gagneraud
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.