From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@ti.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
nm@ti.com, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5] ARM: OMAP5/DRA7: realtime_counter: Configure CNTFRQ register
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:37:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525899B1.7040206@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131012003433.GJ29913@atomide.com>
On Friday 11 October 2013 08:34 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [131010 10:23]:
>> * Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> [131010 06:20]:
>>> On Thursday 10 October 2013 03:43 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
>>>> From: R Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com>
>>>>
>>>> The realtime counter called master counter, produces the count
>>>> used by the private timer peripherals in the MPU_CLUSTER. The
>>>> CNTFRQ per cpu register is used to denote the frequency of the counter.
>>>> Currently the frequency value is passed from the
>>>> DT file, but this is not scalable when we have other non-DT guest
>>>> OS. This register must be set to the right value by the
>>>> secure rom code. Setting this register helps in propagating the right
>>>> frequency value across OSes.
>>>>
>>>> More discussions and the reason for adding this in a non-DT
>>>> way can be seen from below.
>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg93832.html
>>>>
>>>> So configuring this secure register for all the cpus here.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>>>> Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>>>> Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
>>>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>>>> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>>>> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> [V5] Removed the use of extern variable in omap-smp.c
>>>> as per suggestion from Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>>>>
>>> Thanks for the updates Sricharan. Looks fine now.
>>>
>>> Tony, Can you apply this version if you are fine with it.
>>
>> Yes thanks looks good to me now. Applying into omap-for-v3.13/soc.
>
> Grr, had to apply the following fix on top of this for some configs.
>
Looks like Sricharan missed some builds. Sorry for the trouble Tony.
>
> 8< ---------------------------
>
> From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:28:04 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Fix build error for realtime counter init if not enabled
>
> Otherwise we can get an error with some configs:
>
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c:73: undefined reference to `omap_smc1'
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>
Looks fine to me. Thanks
Regards,
Santosh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V5] ARM: OMAP5/DRA7: realtime_counter: Configure CNTFRQ register
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:37:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525899B1.7040206@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131012003433.GJ29913@atomide.com>
On Friday 11 October 2013 08:34 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [131010 10:23]:
>> * Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> [131010 06:20]:
>>> On Thursday 10 October 2013 03:43 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
>>>> From: R Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com>
>>>>
>>>> The realtime counter called master counter, produces the count
>>>> used by the private timer peripherals in the MPU_CLUSTER. The
>>>> CNTFRQ per cpu register is used to denote the frequency of the counter.
>>>> Currently the frequency value is passed from the
>>>> DT file, but this is not scalable when we have other non-DT guest
>>>> OS. This register must be set to the right value by the
>>>> secure rom code. Setting this register helps in propagating the right
>>>> frequency value across OSes.
>>>>
>>>> More discussions and the reason for adding this in a non-DT
>>>> way can be seen from below.
>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap at vger.kernel.org/msg93832.html
>>>>
>>>> So configuring this secure register for all the cpus here.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>>>> Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>>>> Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
>>>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>>>> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>>>> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> [V5] Removed the use of extern variable in omap-smp.c
>>>> as per suggestion from Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>>>>
>>> Thanks for the updates Sricharan. Looks fine now.
>>>
>>> Tony, Can you apply this version if you are fine with it.
>>
>> Yes thanks looks good to me now. Applying into omap-for-v3.13/soc.
>
> Grr, had to apply the following fix on top of this for some configs.
>
Looks like Sricharan missed some builds. Sorry for the trouble Tony.
>
> 8< ---------------------------
>
> From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:28:04 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Fix build error for realtime counter init if not enabled
>
> Otherwise we can get an error with some configs:
>
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c:73: undefined reference to `omap_smc1'
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>
Looks fine to me. Thanks
Regards,
Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-12 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-10 7:43 [PATCH V5] ARM: OMAP5/DRA7: realtime_counter: Configure CNTFRQ register Sricharan R
2013-10-10 7:43 ` Sricharan R
2013-10-10 13:12 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-10-10 13:12 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-10-10 17:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-10-10 17:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-10-12 0:34 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-10-12 0:34 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-10-12 0:37 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2013-10-12 0:37 ` Santosh Shilimkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525899B1.7040206@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=r.sricharan@ti.com \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.