Re: [PATCH 1/6] edac: Don't try to cancel workqueue when it's never setup

[Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>]

On 10/29/13 13:48, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 05:31:25PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> We only setup a workqueue for edac devices that use the polling
>> method. We still try to cancel the workqueue if an edac_device
>> uses the irq method though. This causes a warning from debug
>> objects when we remove an edac device:
>>
>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 56 at lib/debugobjects.c:260 debug_print_object+0x98/0xc0()
>> ODEBUG: assert_init not available (active state 0) object type: timer_list hint: stub_timer+0x0/0x28
>> Modules linked in: krait_edac(-)
>> CPU: 0 PID: 56 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 3.12.0-rc2-00035-g15292a0 #69
>> [<c02179b4>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x144) from [<c0213e58>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24)
>> [<c0213e58>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24) from [<c06f7fc4>] (dump_stack+0x74/0xb4)
>> [<c06f7fc4>] (dump_stack+0x74/0xb4) from [<c0223c34>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0x9c)
>> [<c0223c34>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0x9c) from [<c0223d14>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x48)
>> [<c0223d14>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x48) from [<c04cf078>] (debug_print_object+0x98/0xc0)
>> [<c04cf078>] (debug_print_object+0x98/0xc0) from [<c04cfb54>] (debug_object_assert_init+0xdc/0xec)
>> [<c04cfb54>] (debug_object_assert_init+0xdc/0xec) from [<c02310c4>] (del_timer+0x24/0x7c)
>> [<c02310c4>] (del_timer+0x24/0x7c) from [<c023fef8>] (try_to_grab_pending+0xc0/0x1b0)
>> [<c023fef8>] (try_to_grab_pending+0xc0/0x1b0) from [<c0240014>] (cancel_delayed_work+0x2c/0xa0)
>> [<c0240014>] (cancel_delayed_work+0x2c/0xa0) from [<c059fa14>] (edac_device_workq_teardown+0x1c/0x38)
>> [<c059fa14>] (edac_device_workq_teardown+0x1c/0x38) from [<c059fae8>] (edac_device_del_device+0xb8/0xe4)
>> [<c059fae8>] (edac_device_del_device+0xb8/0xe4) from [<bf000050>] (krait_edac_remove+0x50/0x70 [krait_edac])
>> [<bf000050>] (krait_edac_remove+0x50/0x70 [krait_edac]) from [<c0511e34>] (platform_drv_remove+0x24/0x28)
>> [<c0511e34>] (platform_drv_remove+0x24/0x28) from [<c050fffc>] (__device_release_driver+0x68/0xc0)
>> [<c050fffc>] (__device_release_driver+0x68/0xc0) from [<c0510adc>] (driver_detach+0xc4/0xc8)
>> [<c0510adc>] (driver_detach+0xc4/0xc8) from [<c050fd98>] (bus_remove_driver+0xac/0x114)
>> [<c050fd98>] (bus_remove_driver+0xac/0x114) from [<c05111d8>] (driver_unregister+0x38/0x58)
>> [<c05111d8>] (driver_unregister+0x38/0x58) from [<c0511fe8>] (platform_driver_unregister+0x1c/0x20)
>> [<c0511fe8>] (platform_driver_unregister+0x1c/0x20) from [<bf0005c4>] (krait_edac_driver_exit+0x14/0x1c [krait_edac])
>> [<bf0005c4>] (krait_edac_driver_exit+0x14/0x1c [krait_edac]) from [<c028b248>] (SyS_delete_module+0x178/0x2b4)
>> [<c028b248>] (SyS_delete_module+0x178/0x2b4) from [<c020f760>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x48)
>>
>> Fix it by skipping the workqueue teardown for such devices.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
>
> Btw, you might want to remove the hex numbers in the trace above and
> leave only the call stack to make it more readable.
>

Thanks. I'll do that in the next round.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation