From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] genirq: arm64: perf: support for percpu pmu interrupt
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 17:04:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <527D8A17.9020208@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383739658-10036-1-git-send-email-vkale@apm.com>
On 11/06/13 04:07, Vinayak Kale wrote:
> This patch series adds support to handle interrupt registration/deregistration
> in arm64 pmu driver when pmu interrupt type is percpu.
>
> Patches in this patch series were previously sent out as separate patches [1].
> This patch series incorporates comments/fixes suggested for original patches.
>
> [1]
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-October/205888.html
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-October/204414.html
>
> Vinayak Kale (2):
> genirq: error reporting in request_percpu_irq() and
> request_threaded_irq()
> arm64: perf: add support for percpu pmu interrupt
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> kernel/irq/manage.c | 12 +++--
> 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
What ever happened to the approach here[1]? It doesn't look very nice to
have to request the irq first as a per-cpu interrupt and then try as a
non-percpu interrupt when genirq already knows if its per-cpu or not.
[1] http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1207.3/02955.html
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Vinayak Kale <vkale@apm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: patches@apm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, will.deacon@arm.com, jcm@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] genirq: arm64: perf: support for percpu pmu interrupt
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 17:04:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <527D8A17.9020208@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383739658-10036-1-git-send-email-vkale@apm.com>
On 11/06/13 04:07, Vinayak Kale wrote:
> This patch series adds support to handle interrupt registration/deregistration
> in arm64 pmu driver when pmu interrupt type is percpu.
>
> Patches in this patch series were previously sent out as separate patches [1].
> This patch series incorporates comments/fixes suggested for original patches.
>
> [1]
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-October/205888.html
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-October/204414.html
>
> Vinayak Kale (2):
> genirq: error reporting in request_percpu_irq() and
> request_threaded_irq()
> arm64: perf: add support for percpu pmu interrupt
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> kernel/irq/manage.c | 12 +++--
> 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
What ever happened to the approach here[1]? It doesn't look very nice to
have to request the irq first as a per-cpu interrupt and then try as a
non-percpu interrupt when genirq already knows if its per-cpu or not.
[1] http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1207.3/02955.html
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-09 1:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-06 12:07 [PATCH 0/2] genirq: arm64: perf: support for percpu pmu interrupt Vinayak Kale
2013-11-06 12:07 ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-06 12:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] genirq: error reporting in request_percpu_irq() and request_threaded_irq() Vinayak Kale
2013-11-06 12:07 ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-06 12:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: perf: add support for percpu pmu interrupt Vinayak Kale
2013-11-06 12:07 ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-08 15:57 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-08 15:57 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-11 9:30 ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-11 9:30 ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-09 1:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-11-09 1:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-11-09 1:04 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2013-11-09 1:04 ` [PATCH 0/2] genirq: arm64: perf: " Stephen Boyd
2013-11-11 9:25 ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-11 9:25 ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-11 10:44 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-11 10:44 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-11 12:33 ` Ganapat Rao P Kulkarni
2013-11-11 12:33 ` Ganapat Rao P Kulkarni
2013-11-12 6:00 ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-12 6:00 ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-12 8:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-12 8:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=527D8A17.9020208@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.