All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: perf: add support for percpu pmu interrupt
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 17:04:27 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <527D8A1B.3030001@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383739658-10036-3-git-send-email-vkale@apm.com>

Just some pointer casting nits.

On 11/06/13 04:07, Vinayak Kale wrote:
> Add support for irq registration when pmu interrupt is percpu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Kale <vkale@apm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tuan Phan <tphan@apm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c |  109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> index cea1594..e60dae3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct perf_event * [ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS], hw_events);
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long [BITS_TO_LONGS(ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS)], used_mask);
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pmu_hw_events, cpu_hw_events);
> +static bool is_percpuirq;
>  
>  #define to_arm_pmu(p) (container_of(p, struct arm_pmu, pmu))
>  
> @@ -363,22 +364,51 @@ validate_group(struct perf_event *event)
>  }
>  
>  static void
> +armpmu_disable_percpu_irq(void *data)
> +{
> +	struct arm_pmu *armpmu = (struct arm_pmu *)data;

Useless cast from void *.

> +	struct platform_device *pmu_device = armpmu->plat_device;
> +	int irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, 0);
> +
> +	cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &armpmu->active_irqs);
> +	disable_percpu_irq(irq);
> +}
> +
[...]
>  
> +static void
> +armpmu_enable_percpu_irq(void *data)
> +{
> +	struct arm_pmu *armpmu = (struct arm_pmu *)data;

Here too.

> +	struct platform_device *pmu_device = armpmu->plat_device;
> +	int irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, 0);
> +
> +	enable_percpu_irq(irq, 0);
> +	cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &armpmu->active_irqs);
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  armpmu_reserve_hardware(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
>  {
> @@ -396,34 +426,57 @@ armpmu_reserve_hardware(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < irqs; ++i) {
> -		err = 0;
> -		irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, i);
> -		if (irq < 0)
> -			continue;
> +	irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, 0);
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * If we have a single PMU interrupt that we can't shift,
> -		 * assume that we're running on a uniprocessor machine and
> -		 * continue. Otherwise, continue without this interrupt.
> -		 */
> -		if (irq_set_affinity(irq, cpumask_of(i)) && irqs > 1) {
> -			pr_warning("unable to set irq affinity (irq=%d, cpu=%u)\n",
> -				    irq, i);
> -			continue;
> -		}
> +	/*
> +	 * Try 'request_percpu_irq' first. If it's return value indicates
> +	 * that irq is not percpu then try 'request_irq'
> +	 */
> +	err = request_percpu_irq(irq, armpmu->handle_irq,
> +			"arm-pmu", &cpu_hw_events);
> +	if (err != -EPERM) {
> +		is_percpuirq = true;
>  
> -		err = request_irq(irq, armpmu->handle_irq,
> -				  IRQF_NOBALANCING,
> -				  "arm-pmu", armpmu);
>  		if (err) {
> -			pr_err("unable to request IRQ%d for ARM PMU counters\n",
> -				irq);
> +			pr_err("unable to request percpu IRQ%d for ARM PMU counters\n",
> +					irq);
>  			armpmu_release_hardware(armpmu);
>  			return err;
>  		}
>  
> -		cpumask_set_cpu(i, &armpmu->active_irqs);
> +		on_each_cpu(armpmu_enable_percpu_irq, (void *)armpmu, 1);

Looks like a useless cast to void * here.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Vinayak Kale <vkale@apm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com, patches@apm.com, jcm@redhat.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, Tuan Phan <tphan@apm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: perf: add support for percpu pmu interrupt
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 17:04:27 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <527D8A1B.3030001@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383739658-10036-3-git-send-email-vkale@apm.com>

Just some pointer casting nits.

On 11/06/13 04:07, Vinayak Kale wrote:
> Add support for irq registration when pmu interrupt is percpu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Kale <vkale@apm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tuan Phan <tphan@apm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c |  109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> index cea1594..e60dae3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct perf_event * [ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS], hw_events);
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long [BITS_TO_LONGS(ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS)], used_mask);
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pmu_hw_events, cpu_hw_events);
> +static bool is_percpuirq;
>  
>  #define to_arm_pmu(p) (container_of(p, struct arm_pmu, pmu))
>  
> @@ -363,22 +364,51 @@ validate_group(struct perf_event *event)
>  }
>  
>  static void
> +armpmu_disable_percpu_irq(void *data)
> +{
> +	struct arm_pmu *armpmu = (struct arm_pmu *)data;

Useless cast from void *.

> +	struct platform_device *pmu_device = armpmu->plat_device;
> +	int irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, 0);
> +
> +	cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &armpmu->active_irqs);
> +	disable_percpu_irq(irq);
> +}
> +
[...]
>  
> +static void
> +armpmu_enable_percpu_irq(void *data)
> +{
> +	struct arm_pmu *armpmu = (struct arm_pmu *)data;

Here too.

> +	struct platform_device *pmu_device = armpmu->plat_device;
> +	int irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, 0);
> +
> +	enable_percpu_irq(irq, 0);
> +	cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &armpmu->active_irqs);
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  armpmu_reserve_hardware(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
>  {
> @@ -396,34 +426,57 @@ armpmu_reserve_hardware(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < irqs; ++i) {
> -		err = 0;
> -		irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, i);
> -		if (irq < 0)
> -			continue;
> +	irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, 0);
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * If we have a single PMU interrupt that we can't shift,
> -		 * assume that we're running on a uniprocessor machine and
> -		 * continue. Otherwise, continue without this interrupt.
> -		 */
> -		if (irq_set_affinity(irq, cpumask_of(i)) && irqs > 1) {
> -			pr_warning("unable to set irq affinity (irq=%d, cpu=%u)\n",
> -				    irq, i);
> -			continue;
> -		}
> +	/*
> +	 * Try 'request_percpu_irq' first. If it's return value indicates
> +	 * that irq is not percpu then try 'request_irq'
> +	 */
> +	err = request_percpu_irq(irq, armpmu->handle_irq,
> +			"arm-pmu", &cpu_hw_events);
> +	if (err != -EPERM) {
> +		is_percpuirq = true;
>  
> -		err = request_irq(irq, armpmu->handle_irq,
> -				  IRQF_NOBALANCING,
> -				  "arm-pmu", armpmu);
>  		if (err) {
> -			pr_err("unable to request IRQ%d for ARM PMU counters\n",
> -				irq);
> +			pr_err("unable to request percpu IRQ%d for ARM PMU counters\n",
> +					irq);
>  			armpmu_release_hardware(armpmu);
>  			return err;
>  		}
>  
> -		cpumask_set_cpu(i, &armpmu->active_irqs);
> +		on_each_cpu(armpmu_enable_percpu_irq, (void *)armpmu, 1);

Looks like a useless cast to void * here.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-11-09  1:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-06 12:07 [PATCH 0/2] genirq: arm64: perf: support for percpu pmu interrupt Vinayak Kale
2013-11-06 12:07 ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-06 12:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] genirq: error reporting in request_percpu_irq() and request_threaded_irq() Vinayak Kale
2013-11-06 12:07   ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-06 12:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: perf: add support for percpu pmu interrupt Vinayak Kale
2013-11-06 12:07   ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-08 15:57   ` Will Deacon
2013-11-08 15:57     ` Will Deacon
2013-11-11  9:30     ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-11  9:30       ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-09  1:04   ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2013-11-09  1:04     ` Stephen Boyd
2013-11-09  1:04 ` [PATCH 0/2] genirq: arm64: perf: " Stephen Boyd
2013-11-09  1:04   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-11-11  9:25   ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-11  9:25     ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-11 10:44   ` Will Deacon
2013-11-11 10:44     ` Will Deacon
2013-11-11 12:33     ` Ganapat Rao P Kulkarni
2013-11-11 12:33       ` Ganapat Rao P Kulkarni
2013-11-12  6:00     ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-12  6:00       ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-12  8:31       ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-12  8:31         ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=527D8A1B.3030001@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.