All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] bcma: gpio: add own IRQ domain
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 19:37:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5298DED7.90708@hauke-m.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1385747290-22575-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com>

On 11/29/2013 06:48 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Input GPIO changes can generate interrupts, but we need kind of ACK for
> them by changing IRQ polarity. This is required to stop hardware from
> keep generating interrupts and generate another one on the next GPIO
> state change.
> This code allows using GPIOs with standard interrupts and add for
> example GPIO buttons support.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
> ---
> V3: Apply Hauke's comments.
> 1) Use IRQ domain for CONFIG_BCMA_HOST_SOC only
> 2) Optimize bcma_gpio_irq_handler
> 3) Register GPIO chip after doing everything else
> 4) Improve cleaning paths
> ---
>  drivers/bcma/Kconfig                        |    1 +
>  drivers/bcma/driver_gpio.c                  |  126 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/bcma/bcma_driver_chipcommon.h |    1 +
>  3 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bcma/Kconfig b/drivers/bcma/Kconfig
> index 7c081b3..0ee48be 100644
> --- a/drivers/bcma/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/bcma/Kconfig
> @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ config BCMA_DRIVER_GMAC_CMN
>  config BCMA_DRIVER_GPIO
>  	bool "BCMA GPIO driver"
>  	depends on BCMA && GPIOLIB
> +	select IRQ_DOMAIN if BCMA_HOST_SOC
>  	help
>  	  Driver to provide access to the GPIO pins of the bcma bus.
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/bcma/driver_gpio.c b/drivers/bcma/driver_gpio.c
> index 45f0996..fe9b1bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/bcma/driver_gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/bcma/driver_gpio.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,9 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include <linux/gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>  #include <linux/export.h>
>  #include <linux/bcma/bcma.h>
>  
> @@ -73,19 +76,117 @@ static void bcma_gpio_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio)
>  	bcma_chipco_gpio_pullup(cc, 1 << gpio, 0);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BCMA_HOST_SOC
>  static int bcma_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio)
>  {
>  	struct bcma_drv_cc *cc = bcma_gpio_get_cc(chip);
>  
>  	if (cc->core->bus->hosttype == BCMA_HOSTTYPE_SOC)
> -		return bcma_core_irq(cc->core);
> +		return irq_find_mapping(cc->irq_domain, gpio);
>  	else
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  }
>  
> +static void bcma_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	struct bcma_drv_cc *cc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +	int gpio = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
> +
> +	bcma_chipco_gpio_intmask(cc, BIT(gpio), BIT(gpio));
> +}
> +
> +static void bcma_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	struct bcma_drv_cc *cc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +	int gpio = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
> +
> +	bcma_chipco_gpio_intmask(cc, BIT(gpio), 0);
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_chip bcma_gpio_irq_chip = {
> +	.name		= "BCMA-GPIO",
> +	.irq_mask	= bcma_gpio_irq_mask,
> +	.irq_unmask	= bcma_gpio_irq_unmask,
> +};
> +
> +static irqreturn_t bcma_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> +	struct bcma_drv_cc *cc = dev_id;
> +	u32 val = bcma_cc_read32(cc, BCMA_CC_GPIOIN);
> +	u32 mask = bcma_cc_read32(cc, BCMA_CC_GPIOIRQ);
> +	u32 pol = bcma_cc_read32(cc, BCMA_CC_GPIOPOL);
> +	u32 irqs = (val ^ pol) & mask;
> +	u32 pol_mask = 0, pol_val = 0;
> +	int gpio;
> +
> +	for_each_set_bit(gpio, (unsigned long *)&irqs, cc->gpio.ngpio) {
> +		generic_handle_irq(bcma_gpio_to_irq(&cc->gpio, gpio));
> +		pol_mask |= BIT(gpio);
> +		if (val & BIT(gpio))
> +			pol_val |= BIT(gpio);
> +	}

Instead of calculation pol_mask and pol_val bit for bit manually, you
can pretty easy calculate valid value like this:
pol_mask = irqs;
pol_val = val & irqs;

> +	bcma_chipco_gpio_polarity(cc, pol_mask, pol_val);
> +
> +	return irqs ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE;
> +}
> +
> +static int bcma_gpio_irq_domain_init(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
> +{
> +	struct gpio_chip *chip = &cc->gpio;
> +	int gpio, hwirq, err;
> +
> +	cc->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(NULL, chip->ngpio,
> +					       &irq_domain_simple_ops, cc);
> +	if (!cc->irq_domain) {
> +		err = -ENODEV;
> +		goto err_irq_domain;
> +	}
> +	for (gpio = 0; gpio < chip->ngpio; gpio++) {
> +		int irq = irq_create_mapping(cc->irq_domain, gpio);
> +
> +		irq_set_chip_data(irq, cc);
> +		irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &bcma_gpio_irq_chip,
> +					 handle_simple_irq);
> +	}
> +
> +	hwirq = bcma_core_irq(cc->core);
> +	err = request_irq(hwirq, bcma_gpio_irq_handler, IRQF_SHARED, "gpio",
> +			  cc);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto err_req_irq;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_req_irq:
> +	for (gpio = 0; gpio < chip->ngpio; gpio++) {
> +		int irq = irq_find_mapping(cc->irq_domain, gpio);
> +
> +		irq_dispose_mapping(irq);
> +	}
> +	irq_domain_remove(cc->irq_domain);
> +err_irq_domain:
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static void bcma_gpio_irq_domain_exit(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
> +{
> +	struct gpio_chip *chip = &cc->gpio;
> +	int gpio;
> +
> +	free_irq(bcma_core_irq(cc->core), cc);
> +	for (gpio = 0; gpio < chip->ngpio; gpio++) {
> +		int irq = irq_find_mapping(cc->irq_domain, gpio);
> +
> +		irq_dispose_mapping(irq);
> +	}
> +	irq_domain_remove(cc->irq_domain);
> +}
> +#endif

I do not like all these ifdefs, why not add this and remove some of them
from the code in bcma_gpio_init():

#else /* CONFIG_BCMA_HOST_SOC */

static int bcma_gpio_irq_domain_init(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
{
	return 0;
}
static void bcma_gpio_irq_domain_exit(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
{
	/* Nothing */
}
#endif /* CONFIG_BCMA_HOST_SOC */

> +
>  int bcma_gpio_init(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
>  {
>  	struct gpio_chip *chip = &cc->gpio;
> +	int err;
>  
>  	chip->label		= "bcma_gpio";
>  	chip->owner		= THIS_MODULE;
> @@ -95,7 +196,9 @@ int bcma_gpio_init(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
>  	chip->set		= bcma_gpio_set_value;
>  	chip->direction_input	= bcma_gpio_direction_input;
>  	chip->direction_output	= bcma_gpio_direction_output;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BCMA_HOST_SOC
>  	chip->to_irq		= bcma_gpio_to_irq;
> +#endif
>  	chip->ngpio		= 16;
>  	/* There is just one SoC in one device and its GPIO addresses should be
>  	 * deterministic to address them more easily. The other buses could get
> @@ -105,10 +208,29 @@ int bcma_gpio_init(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
>  	else
>  		chip->base		= -1;
>  
> -	return gpiochip_add(chip);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BCMA_HOST_SOC
> +	err = bcma_gpio_irq_domain_init(cc);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +#endif
> +
> +	err = gpiochip_add(chip);
> +	if (err) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BCMA_HOST_SOC
> +		bcma_gpio_irq_domain_exit(cc);
> +#endif
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	bcma_cc_set32(cc, BCMA_CC_IRQMASK, BCMA_CC_IRQ_GPIO);

This should be moved into bcma_gpio_irq_domain_ini(), I do not know what
happens when we activate them on a PCIe device. IRQs should get
deactivated in bcma_gpio_irq_domain_exit().

> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  int bcma_gpio_unregister(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
>  {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BCMA_HOST_SOC
> +	bcma_gpio_irq_domain_exit(cc);
> +#endif
>  	return gpiochip_remove(&cc->gpio);
>  }
> diff --git a/include/linux/bcma/bcma_driver_chipcommon.h b/include/linux/bcma/bcma_driver_chipcommon.h
> index c49e1a1..63d105c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bcma/bcma_driver_chipcommon.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bcma/bcma_driver_chipcommon.h
> @@ -640,6 +640,7 @@ struct bcma_drv_cc {
>  	spinlock_t gpio_lock;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BCMA_DRIVER_GPIO
>  	struct gpio_chip gpio;
> +	struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
>  #endif
>  };
>  
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-29 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-29 16:09 [PATCH V2 1/2] bcma: gpio: add own IRQ domain Rafał Miłecki
2013-11-29 16:09 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] MIPS: BCM47XX: Prepare support for GPIO buttons Rafał Miłecki
2013-12-09 13:33   ` Hauke Mehrtens
2013-12-10 15:24   ` [PATCH V3 " Rafał Miłecki
2013-12-11 21:56     ` Hauke Mehrtens
2014-01-02 12:31     ` [PATCH V4] " Rafał Miłecki
2013-11-29 16:31 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] bcma: gpio: add own IRQ domain Hauke Mehrtens
2013-11-29 16:55   ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-11-29 17:48 ` [PATCH V3 " Rafał Miłecki
2013-11-29 18:37   ` Hauke Mehrtens [this message]
2013-11-29 19:12   ` [PATCH V4 " Rafał Miłecki
2013-11-29 20:37     ` John Crispin
2013-11-29 20:53       ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-11-29 21:16         ` John Crispin
2013-12-08 18:10           ` Hauke Mehrtens
2013-12-08 19:24             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-12-10 11:56     ` [PATCH V5 " Rafał Miłecki
2013-12-11 21:53       ` Hauke Mehrtens
2013-12-12 12:42       ` [PATCH V6 " Rafał Miłecki
2013-12-12 12:46         ` [PATCH V7 " Rafał Miłecki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5298DED7.90708@hauke-m.de \
    --to=hauke@hauke-m.de \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.