Re: [PATCH 4/4] pinctrl: tegra: add pinmux controller driver for Tegra124

[Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

On Friday 06 December 2013 05:00 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 12/05/2013 03:57 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> From: Ashwini Ghuge <aghuge-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> This adds a driver for the Tegra124 pinmux, and required
>> parameterization data for Tegra124.
>>
>> The driver uses the common Tegra pincontrol driver utility
>> functions to implement the majority of the driver.
>>
>> This driver is not compatible with the earlier NVIDIA's SoCs,
>> hence add new compatibile as "nvidia,tegra124-pinmux".
>>
>> Originally written by Ashwini Gguhe.
>> ldewangan:
>>          - cleanup the patches,
>>          - Fix address issue.
> IIRC, Thierry mentioned he had some fixes in his local branch for this
> driver. Thierry, can you please confirm/deny this?
>
> I made the following comment on the version Ashwini posted, which hasn't
> been addressed yet:
>
> A day or two ago during upstream review:

Yes, we have some missing entry and I responded into other mail thread. 
I will post the diff here to complete.


>>> +static const struct tegra_function  tegra124_functions[] = {
>> ...
>>> +	FUNCTION(i2c1),
>>> +	FUNCTION(i2c2),
>>> +	FUNCTION(i2c3),
>>> +	FUNCTION(i2c4),
>>> +	FUNCTION(i2cpwr),
>> Is that complete? Tegra124 apparently has 6 I2C controllers. Are the
>> pins for the new sixth controller (0x7000d100) not affected by the pinmux?
> That said, if we find things are missing, I suppose we can add them
> later without breaking existing ABI. Breakage would only happen if we
> had to change/remove something.
>
> During downstream review quite a while ago I also said:

I2C6 pinmux is not in this controller, it is dpaux controller and we 
have not supported this. This require little bit different handling. I 
have already downstream bug for support this. Will add you in loop so 
that single fix can work for mainline and downstream.

Other than I2C6, some other mux are missing.


>>>> +static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc  tegra124_pins[] = {
>>> There are two spaces before "tegra124_pins[]".
>>>
>>>> +static const char * const gmi_groups[] = {
>>>> +	"uart2_cts_n_pj5",
>>>> +	"uart2_rts_n_pj6",
>>>> +	"uart3_txd_pw6",
>>>> +	"uart3_rxd_pw7",
>>>> +	"uart3_cts_n_pa1",
>>>> +	"uart3_rts_n_pc0",
>>>> +
>>>> +	"pu0",
>>> It'd be best not to have blank lines in the middle of arrays. The same comment exists elsewhere in the
>>> file, so make sure you search the whole file.
> Nits:
>
> - There are some cases of multiple blank lines back-to-back.
> - There's a blank line at the end of the file.
>
> Aside from those minor issues, patches 1/4 and 4/4,
> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>
> (BTW, those 2 patches would go through the pinctrl tree, and patches 2/4
> and 3/4 would go through the Tegra tree. You generally shouldn't posted
> patches that will be applied to different trees in the same series,
> since there aren't dependencies).
Fine.
Should I sent the diff or full change? I think full change as this need 
to go on pincontrol subsystem, not in Tegra.

Thanks,
Laxman