All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend] cpufreq: remove sysfs files for CPU which failed to come back after resume
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 21:15:40 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52B85AA4.6070609@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pponx07s.fsf@nemi.mork.no>

On Monday 23 December 2013 05:12 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> That would be great.  This could be just me.  I am quite good at
> breaking stuff.

No its not you. While we tried to make sure everything is preserved,
few special things still stayed out :)

And they are solved with this patch, log should be good enough to give
proper reasoning:

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 20:51:54 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: preserve user_policy across suspend/resume

In __cpufreq_add_dev() we are reinitializing user_policy with default values and
hence would loose values of user_policy.{min|max|policy|governor} fields.

Preserve them by not overriding these for suspend/resume.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 14 +++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 16d7b4a..c5c3dac 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -839,9 +839,6 @@ static void cpufreq_init_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)

 	/* set default policy */
 	ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
-	policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy;
-	policy->user_policy.governor = policy->governor;
-
 	if (ret) {
 		pr_debug("setting policy failed\n");
 		if (cpufreq_driver->exit)
@@ -1069,8 +1066,10 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif,
 	 */
 	cpumask_and(policy->cpus, policy->cpus, cpu_online_mask);

-	policy->user_policy.min = policy->min;
-	policy->user_policy.max = policy->max;
+	if (!frozen) {
+		policy->user_policy.min = policy->min;
+		policy->user_policy.max = policy->max;
+	}

 	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
 				     CPUFREQ_START, policy);
@@ -1101,6 +1100,11 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif,

 	cpufreq_init_policy(policy);

+	if (!frozen) {
+		policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy;
+		policy->user_policy.governor = policy->governor;
+	}
+
 	kobject_uevent(&policy->kobj, KOBJ_ADD);
 	up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend] cpufreq: remove sysfs files for CPU which failed to come back after resume
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 21:15:40 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52B85AA4.6070609@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pponx07s.fsf@nemi.mork.no>

On Monday 23 December 2013 05:12 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> That would be great.  This could be just me.  I am quite good at
> breaking stuff.

No its not you. While we tried to make sure everything is preserved,
few special things still stayed out :)

And they are solved with this patch, log should be good enough to give
proper reasoning:

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 20:51:54 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: preserve user_policy across suspend/resume

In __cpufreq_add_dev() we are reinitializing user_policy with default values and
hence would loose values of user_policy.{min|max|policy|governor} fields.

Preserve them by not overriding these for suspend/resume.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 14 +++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 16d7b4a..c5c3dac 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -839,9 +839,6 @@ static void cpufreq_init_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)

 	/* set default policy */
 	ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
-	policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy;
-	policy->user_policy.governor = policy->governor;
-
 	if (ret) {
 		pr_debug("setting policy failed\n");
 		if (cpufreq_driver->exit)
@@ -1069,8 +1066,10 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif,
 	 */
 	cpumask_and(policy->cpus, policy->cpus, cpu_online_mask);

-	policy->user_policy.min = policy->min;
-	policy->user_policy.max = policy->max;
+	if (!frozen) {
+		policy->user_policy.min = policy->min;
+		policy->user_policy.max = policy->max;
+	}

 	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
 				     CPUFREQ_START, policy);
@@ -1101,6 +1100,11 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif,

 	cpufreq_init_policy(policy);

+	if (!frozen) {
+		policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy;
+		policy->user_policy.governor = policy->governor;
+	}
+
 	kobject_uevent(&policy->kobj, KOBJ_ADD);
 	up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);



  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-23 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-20 15:56 [PATCH Resend] cpufreq: remove sysfs files for CPU which failed to come back after resume Viresh Kumar
2013-12-20 15:56 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-12-22  1:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-22  1:00   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-23  5:55   ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23  5:55     ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23  6:02     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-12-23  6:55       ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23  6:55         ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23  7:55         ` viresh kumar
2013-12-23  9:23           ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23  9:23             ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23 10:45             ` Viresh Kumar
2013-12-23 10:57               ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23 10:57                 ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23 11:13                 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-12-23 11:42                   ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23 11:42                     ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23 15:45                     ` viresh kumar [this message]
2013-12-23 15:45                       ` viresh kumar
2013-12-24  0:35                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-24  0:35                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-24  0:27                         ` Viresh Kumar
2013-12-24  0:43                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52B85AA4.6070609@linaro.org \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=bjorn@mork.no \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.