From: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend] cpufreq: remove sysfs files for CPU which failed to come back after resume
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 11:57:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87txdzx2bb.fsf@nemi.mork.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpo=0HRihdTiQLk+mKiarUdXOPO3n7GCJ9CUoi=4xJ_AYcg@mail.gmail.com> (Viresh Kumar's message of "Mon, 23 Dec 2013 16:15:06 +0530")
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> writes:
> On 23 December 2013 14:53, Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> wrote:
>
>> But if you really want to implement suspend/resume, then you
>> do need to keep the whole device and not just the sysfs files. Keeping
>> the attribute files allow you to save and restore changed permissions,
>> but it doesn't save any user modified settings.
>
> Which settings are you talking about? I thought we are preserving all
> files..
I could be missing something, but I haven't noticed any attempt to
preserve anything except the sysfs files.
I tried modifying the max frequency, using
echo 800000 >/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
echo 800000 >/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
After supend + resume the boot CPU still had the modifed maximum, while
the non-boot core was reset to the default value. I changed the gid of
both files too, verifying that they were saved and restored as expected.
But the value will change to default.
IMHO it would still be a lot better if this was handled as a true
hotplug event, allowing userspace to reset values/modes/owners on
resume. Hiding the hotplug event and saving part of the userspace
controlled environment is worse than not doing anything at all.
Bjørn
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"cpufreq\@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend] cpufreq: remove sysfs files for CPU which failed to come back after resume
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 11:57:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87txdzx2bb.fsf@nemi.mork.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpo=0HRihdTiQLk+mKiarUdXOPO3n7GCJ9CUoi=4xJ_AYcg@mail.gmail.com> (Viresh Kumar's message of "Mon, 23 Dec 2013 16:15:06 +0530")
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> writes:
> On 23 December 2013 14:53, Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> wrote:
>
>> But if you really want to implement suspend/resume, then you
>> do need to keep the whole device and not just the sysfs files. Keeping
>> the attribute files allow you to save and restore changed permissions,
>> but it doesn't save any user modified settings.
>
> Which settings are you talking about? I thought we are preserving all
> files..
I could be missing something, but I haven't noticed any attempt to
preserve anything except the sysfs files.
I tried modifying the max frequency, using
echo 800000 >/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
echo 800000 >/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
After supend + resume the boot CPU still had the modifed maximum, while
the non-boot core was reset to the default value. I changed the gid of
both files too, verifying that they were saved and restored as expected.
But the value will change to default.
IMHO it would still be a lot better if this was handled as a true
hotplug event, allowing userspace to reset values/modes/owners on
resume. Hiding the hotplug event and saving part of the userspace
controlled environment is worse than not doing anything at all.
Bjørn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-23 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-20 15:56 [PATCH Resend] cpufreq: remove sysfs files for CPU which failed to come back after resume Viresh Kumar
2013-12-20 15:56 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-12-22 1:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-22 1:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-23 5:55 ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23 5:55 ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23 6:02 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-12-23 6:55 ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23 6:55 ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23 7:55 ` viresh kumar
2013-12-23 9:23 ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23 9:23 ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23 10:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-12-23 10:57 ` Bjørn Mork [this message]
2013-12-23 10:57 ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23 11:13 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-12-23 11:42 ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23 11:42 ` Bjørn Mork
2013-12-23 15:45 ` viresh kumar
2013-12-23 15:45 ` viresh kumar
2013-12-24 0:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-24 0:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-24 0:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-12-24 0:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87txdzx2bb.fsf@nemi.mork.no \
--to=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.