Anyone done long term testing?

Anyone done long term testing?

[Ben Greear]

I left an ath10k system up overnight, running 128kbps traffic on each of 32 stations,
and by morning, the machine was OOM.

Just curious if anyone had done overnight traffic runs with any luck?

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Re: Anyone done long term testing?

[Dave Taht]

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
> I left an ath10k system up overnight, running 128kbps traffic on each of 32 stations,
> and by morning, the machine was OOM.
>
> Just curious if anyone had done overnight traffic runs with any luck?

I am planning a truly abusive period for the ath10k starting next
month. Will start
tonight. I can't quite scale to the same number of stations as you can, but can
certainly pump a few gb through what I got on a regular basis.

>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
> --
> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
> Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ath10k mailing list
> ath10k@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k



-- 
Dave Täht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Re: Anyone done long term testing?

[Kalle Valo]

Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> writes:

> I left an ath10k system up overnight, running 128kbps traffic on each
> of 32 stations, and by morning, the machine was OOM.

Did you see SWBA overrun warnings before the OOM? I saw one report of
such issue. This patch should help with that:

748afc4 ath10k: implement and use new beacon method

> Just curious if anyone had done overnight traffic runs with any luck?

I'm running our AP135 board with ath9k+ath10k as my main AP and have
seen SWBA overruns few times, otherwise it has been pretty stable. But I
haven't yet tested with the patch above to see if the SWBA overruns are
really gone.

-- 
Kalle Valo

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Re: Anyone done long term testing?

[Ben Greear]

On 01/24/2014 11:03 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> writes:
> 
>> I left an ath10k system up overnight, running 128kbps traffic on each
>> of 32 stations, and by morning, the machine was OOM.
> 
> Did you see SWBA overrun warnings before the OOM? I saw one report of
> such issue. This patch should help with that:
> 
> 748afc4 ath10k: implement and use new beacon method
> 
>> Just curious if anyone had done overnight traffic runs with any luck?
> 
> I'm running our AP135 board with ath9k+ath10k as my main AP and have
> seen SWBA overruns few times, otherwise it has been pretty stable. But I
> haven't yet tested with the patch above to see if the SWBA overruns are
> really gone.

I didn't notice any SWBA warnings, but perhaps they were there.
I'll keep a look out for them if it happens again.

I'm also running in station mode, with lots of station vifs, so might be
hitting some issue specific to that.  I guess in station mode I shouldn't
be sending any beacons anyway, so probably not the beacon issue.

I'll update to latest to pull in that beacon patch and continue testing.

Thanks,
Ben


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Re: Anyone done long term testing?

[Kalle Valo]

Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> writes:

> On 01/24/2014 11:03 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> writes:
>> 
>>> I left an ath10k system up overnight, running 128kbps traffic on each
>>> of 32 stations, and by morning, the machine was OOM.
>> 
>> Did you see SWBA overrun warnings before the OOM? I saw one report of
>> such issue. This patch should help with that:
>> 
>> 748afc4 ath10k: implement and use new beacon method
>> 
>>> Just curious if anyone had done overnight traffic runs with any luck?
>> 
>> I'm running our AP135 board with ath9k+ath10k as my main AP and have
>> seen SWBA overruns few times, otherwise it has been pretty stable. But I
>> haven't yet tested with the patch above to see if the SWBA overruns are
>> really gone.
>
> I didn't notice any SWBA warnings, but perhaps they were there.
> I'll keep a look out for them if it happens again.
>
> I'm also running in station mode, with lots of station vifs, so might be
> hitting some issue specific to that.  I guess in station mode I shouldn't
> be sending any beacons anyway, so probably not the beacon issue.

Heh, I didn't realise that you were using station mode. Then most likely
you are seeing something else.

-- 
Kalle Valo

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k