From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: keystone: switch to use runtime pm
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:20:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52EBF790.3090407@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140131164534.GL20736@saruman.home>
On Friday 31 January 2014 11:45 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:50:40AM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Friday 31 January 2014 10:47 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:43:21AM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>>> On Friday 31 January 2014 10:19 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 03:20:26PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>>>>> The Keystone PM management layer has been implemented using PM bus for
>>>>>> power management clocks. As result, most of Keystone drivers don't need
>>>>>> to manage clocks directly. They just need to enable runtime PM and use it
>>>>>> to handle their PM state and clocks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hence, remove clock management code and switch to use runtime PM.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> quite a few weeks back I sent a series enabling runtime pm for all glue
>>>>> layers. I'll use that version instead, sorry.
>>>>>
>>>> That should be fine but you need to drop clk_*() related code
>>>> from that patch. I assume you will send refresh version of it then.
>>>
>>> why ? it makes no difference if you enable twice and disable twice.
>>>
>> Sure but why do you want to have the clock node handling code in drivers
>> if it is not needed. Isn't that better ?
>
> It might, but then way that I wanted to see it is so that I can make
> assumptions about the device state. From a driver perspective, what I
> would love to see is the ability to assume that when my probe gets
> called the device is already enabled. So if you can make sure that
> clk_enable() happens before my probe and that you call
> pm_runtime_set_active() before my probe too, then I can more than
> hapilly remove clk_* calls from the driver ;-)
>
> either that or maintain the driver like so:
>
> probe()
> {
> ...
>
> clk_get(dev, "fck");
> clk_prepare(clk);
> clk_enable(clk);
> pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
> pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> ...
> }
>
> runtime_suspend()
> {
> clk_disable(dev);
> }
>
> runtime_resume()
> {
> clk_enable(dev);
> }
>
> note that because of pm_runtime_set_active() that first
> pm_runtime_get_sync() in probe() will simply increase the reference
> counter without calling my ->runtime_resume() callback, which is exactly
> what we want, as that would completely avoid situations of bad context
> being restored because of that initial pm_runtime_get_sync().
>
Thanks for making your point bit clear.
> Then, we can even make pm_runtime completely async easily, because
> clk_prepare() was called only on probe() (or before it, for that
> matter).
>
> Bottomline is, if you can guarantee me that clk_get(), clk_prepare(),
> clk_enable() and pm_runtime_set_active() will be called properly before
> my probe, i'll be more than happy to comply with your request above as
> that will greatly simplify my driver.
>
Which is the case at least I see on Keystone. And hence the patch from
Grygorii works. I also noticed your proposal for wider platform to
enforce above behavior which seems to be a good idea.
> Just make, also, that if this clock is shared between dwc3-keystone
> wrapper and dwc3 core, you clk_get() on both driver's probe.
>
I understand. In summary, whichever patch you pick(yours) or Grygorii's,
its completely safe to remove the clock handling from Keystone USB driver.
Regards,
Santosh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
<ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: keystone: switch to use runtime pm
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:20:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52EBF790.3090407@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140131164534.GL20736@saruman.home>
On Friday 31 January 2014 11:45 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:50:40AM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Friday 31 January 2014 10:47 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:43:21AM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>>> On Friday 31 January 2014 10:19 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 03:20:26PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>>>>> The Keystone PM management layer has been implemented using PM bus for
>>>>>> power management clocks. As result, most of Keystone drivers don't need
>>>>>> to manage clocks directly. They just need to enable runtime PM and use it
>>>>>> to handle their PM state and clocks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hence, remove clock management code and switch to use runtime PM.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> quite a few weeks back I sent a series enabling runtime pm for all glue
>>>>> layers. I'll use that version instead, sorry.
>>>>>
>>>> That should be fine but you need to drop clk_*() related code
>>>> from that patch. I assume you will send refresh version of it then.
>>>
>>> why ? it makes no difference if you enable twice and disable twice.
>>>
>> Sure but why do you want to have the clock node handling code in drivers
>> if it is not needed. Isn't that better ?
>
> It might, but then way that I wanted to see it is so that I can make
> assumptions about the device state. From a driver perspective, what I
> would love to see is the ability to assume that when my probe gets
> called the device is already enabled. So if you can make sure that
> clk_enable() happens before my probe and that you call
> pm_runtime_set_active() before my probe too, then I can more than
> hapilly remove clk_* calls from the driver ;-)
>
> either that or maintain the driver like so:
>
> probe()
> {
> ...
>
> clk_get(dev, "fck");
> clk_prepare(clk);
> clk_enable(clk);
> pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
> pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> ...
> }
>
> runtime_suspend()
> {
> clk_disable(dev);
> }
>
> runtime_resume()
> {
> clk_enable(dev);
> }
>
> note that because of pm_runtime_set_active() that first
> pm_runtime_get_sync() in probe() will simply increase the reference
> counter without calling my ->runtime_resume() callback, which is exactly
> what we want, as that would completely avoid situations of bad context
> being restored because of that initial pm_runtime_get_sync().
>
Thanks for making your point bit clear.
> Then, we can even make pm_runtime completely async easily, because
> clk_prepare() was called only on probe() (or before it, for that
> matter).
>
> Bottomline is, if you can guarantee me that clk_get(), clk_prepare(),
> clk_enable() and pm_runtime_set_active() will be called properly before
> my probe, i'll be more than happy to comply with your request above as
> that will greatly simplify my driver.
>
Which is the case at least I see on Keystone. And hence the patch from
Grygorii works. I also noticed your proposal for wider platform to
enforce above behavior which seems to be a good idea.
> Just make, also, that if this clock is shared between dwc3-keystone
> wrapper and dwc3 core, you clk_get() on both driver's probe.
>
I understand. In summary, whichever patch you pick(yours) or Grygorii's,
its completely safe to remove the clock handling from Keystone USB driver.
Regards,
Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-31 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-31 13:20 [PATCH] usb: dwc3: keystone: switch to use runtime pm Grygorii Strashko
2014-01-31 13:20 ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-01-31 14:35 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-01-31 14:35 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-01-31 15:19 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-01-31 15:19 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-01-31 15:43 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-01-31 15:43 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-01-31 15:47 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-01-31 15:47 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-01-31 15:50 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-01-31 15:50 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-01-31 16:45 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-01-31 16:45 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-01-31 19:20 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2014-01-31 19:20 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-01-31 22:15 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-01-31 22:15 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-01-31 23:04 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-01-31 23:04 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-01-31 21:13 ` Alan Stern
2014-01-31 21:13 ` Alan Stern
2014-01-31 22:11 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-01-31 22:11 ` Felipe Balbi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52EBF790.3090407@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.