From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it>
To: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
"lin >> \"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org\""
<linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: What to do about df and btrfs fi df
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 23:14:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F94F5D.6000908@libero.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140210170606.GK6490@carfax.org.uk>
On 02/10/2014 06:06 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> Biggest multiplier leads to the pessimistic estimate, which is what
> I'd prefer to see here, so that's good. Agree with this.
I would prefer to use as "raid multiplier" the ratio
total data block groups + total metadata block group
--------------------------------------------------------------
disk space allocated for data and metdata block group
I hope that this would work better when we have a filesystem composed
by small (inlined) files or when we will have per-subvolume RAID levels.
--
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-10 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-10 16:41 What to do about df and btrfs fi df Josef Bacik
2014-02-10 17:06 ` Hugo Mills
2014-02-10 18:24 ` cwillu
2014-02-10 18:28 ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-10 18:36 ` cwillu
2014-02-10 18:41 ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-10 18:54 ` cwillu
2014-02-10 19:05 ` Hugo Mills
2014-02-11 17:36 ` David Sterba
2014-02-17 17:08 ` David Sterba
2014-02-18 8:33 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2014-02-18 16:43 ` David Sterba
2014-02-11 1:02 ` Roger Binns
2014-02-11 3:13 ` cwillu
2014-02-11 3:35 ` ronnie sahlberg
2014-02-11 19:58 ` Roger Binns
2014-02-10 22:14 ` Goffredo Baroncelli [this message]
2014-02-10 22:26 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-10 22:56 ` cwillu
2014-02-11 13:14 ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-11 18:20 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-11 18:33 ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-11 18:46 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-11 18:56 ` Hugo Mills
2014-02-12 21:03 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-11 20:53 ` Sandy McArthur
2014-02-12 3:09 ` Kostia Khlebopros
2014-02-12 21:12 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-12 3:55 ` Anand Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52F94F5D.6000908@libero.it \
--to=kreijack@libero.it \
--cc=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=kreijack@inwind.it \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.