Re: What to do about df and btrfs fi df

[Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it>]

Hi Kostia,

On 02/12/2014 04:09 AM, Kostia Khlebopros wrote:
> Any plans on having "brtfs fi df" report more precise values rather
> then rounded off to the nearest hundredth of a unit. full
> kilobytes(1024 bytes =1Kib) or in bytes would be nice> 
> Current output:
> 
> # btrfs fi df /data
> Data, single: total=1.37TiB, used=1.35TiB
> System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=192.00KiB
> System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00
> Metadata, DUP: total=3.00GiB, used=1.62GiB
> Metadata, single: total=8.00MiB, used=0.00
> 
> Better would be:
> 
> # btrfs fi df /data
> Data, single: total=14123412341 bytes, used=1342343 bytes
> ...etc you know what I mean...
> 

My patches have a switch '-b' which set the units in byte. 

$ sudo ./btrfs fi df /
Disk size:		138.05GiB
Disk allocated:		 25.04GiB
Disk unallocated:	113.01GiB
Used:			 21.36GiB
Free (Estimated):	105.61GiB	(Max: 114.68GiB, min: 58.17GiB)
Data to disk ratio:	     92 %

$ sudo ./btrfs fi df -b /
Disk size:		      148229656576
Disk allocated:		       26881294336
Disk unallocated:	      121348362240
Used:			       22939594752
Free (Estimated):	      113402084997	(Max: 123134189568, min: 62460008448)
Data to disk ratio:	              92 %


> I wish there was more you know.
> 
> Kind Regards,
> 
> Kostia

BR
G.Baroncelli


-- 
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D  17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5