From: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org
Subject: Re: Timeline of IPoIB performance
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:58:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52irw5f5t0.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <434ACC74.3020404@hp.com> (Rick Jones's message of "Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:17:56 -0700")
Rick> Which rev of netperf are you using, and areyou using the
Rick> "confidence intervals" options (-i, -I)? for a long time,
Rick> the linux-unique behaviour of returning the overhead bytes
Rick> for SO_[SND|RCV]BUF and them being 2X what one gives in
Rick> setsockopt() gave netperf some trouble - the socket buffer
Rick> would double in size each iteration on a confidence interval
Rick> run. Later netperf versions (late 2.3, and 2.4.X) have a
Rick> kludge for this.
I believe it's netperf 2.2.
I'm not using any confidence interval stuff. However, the variation
is not between single runs of netperf -- if I do 5 runs of netperf in
a row, I get roughly the same number from each run. For example, I
might see something like
TCP STREAM TEST to 192.168.145.2 : histogram
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 10.00 3869.82
and then
TCP STREAM TEST to 192.168.145.2 : histogram
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 10.00 3862.41
for two successive runs. However, if I reboot the system into the
same kernel (ie everything set up exactly the same), the same
invocation of netperf might give
TCP STREAM TEST to 192.168.145.2 : histogram
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 10.00 4389.20
Rick> Are there large changes in service demand along with the
Rick> large performance changes?
Not sure. How do I have netperf report service demand?
- R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-10 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1128672413.13948.326.camel@localhost>
[not found] ` <52br20lsei.fsf@cisco.com>
2005-10-08 2:25 ` Timeline of IPoIB performance Matt Leininger
2005-10-10 18:23 ` Roland Dreier
2005-10-10 20:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2005-10-10 21:03 ` Roland Dreier
2005-10-10 20:17 ` Rick Jones
2005-10-10 20:58 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2005-10-10 21:22 ` Rick Jones
2005-10-10 21:26 ` Grant Grundler
2005-10-10 23:30 ` Grant Grundler
2005-10-11 0:51 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-10 23:25 ` Matt Leininger
2005-10-10 23:38 ` Roland Dreier
2005-10-10 23:44 ` Matt Leininger
2005-10-10 23:53 ` Roland Dreier
2005-10-11 4:03 ` Roland Dreier
[not found] <E1EPIxF-0001Cp-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
2005-10-12 16:53 ` Roland Dreier
2005-10-12 18:28 ` Matt Leininger
2005-10-13 1:24 ` Matt Leininger
2005-10-13 1:48 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52irw5f5t0.fsf@cisco.com \
--to=rolandd@cisco.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openib-general@openib.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.