From: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
To: Matt Leininger <mlleinin@hpcn.ca.sandia.gov>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org
Subject: Re: Timeline of IPoIB performance
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:03:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52u0fod7jc.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <527jcldj4n.fsf@cisco.com> (Roland Dreier's message of "Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:53:12 -0700")
Roland> I might get a chance to do it tonight... I'll post if I do.
I'm giving it a shot but I just can't reproduce this well on my
systems. I do see a pretty big regression between 2.6.12-rc4 and
2.6.14-rc2, but 2.6.12-rc5 looks OK on my systems.
I reflashed to FW 4.7.0 (mem-ful) and built netperf 2.4.1.
With 2.6.12-rc4 I've seen runs as slow as:
TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.145.2 (192.168.145.2) port 0 AF_INET
Recv Send Send Utilization Service Demand
Socket Socket Message Elapsed Send Recv Send Recv
Size Size Size Time Throughput local remote local remote
bytes bytes bytes secs. MBytes /s % S % U us/KB us/KB
87380 16384 16384 10.00 553.71 37.46 -1.00 2.642 -1.000
and with 2.6.12-rc5 I've seen runs as fast as:
TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.145.2 (192.168.145.2) port 0 AF_INET
Recv Send Send Utilization Service Demand
Socket Socket Message Elapsed Send Recv Send Recv
Size Size Size Time Throughput local remote local remote
bytes bytes bytes secs. MBytes /s % S % U us/KB us/KB
87380 16384 16384 10.00 581.82 39.58 -1.00 2.657 -1.000
so not much difference there. With 2.6.14-rc2, the best of 10 runs was:
TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.145.2 (192.168.145.2) port 0 AF_INET
Recv Send Send Utilization Service Demand
Socket Socket Message Elapsed Send Recv Send Recv
Size Size Size Time Throughput local remote local remote
bytes bytes bytes secs. MBytes /s % S % U us/KB us/KB
87380 16384 16384 10.01 497.00 39.71 -1.00 3.121 -1.000
so we've definitely lost something there.
Time to do some more bisecting...
- R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-11 4:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1128672413.13948.326.camel@localhost>
[not found] ` <52br20lsei.fsf@cisco.com>
2005-10-08 2:25 ` Timeline of IPoIB performance Matt Leininger
2005-10-10 18:23 ` Roland Dreier
2005-10-10 20:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2005-10-10 21:03 ` Roland Dreier
2005-10-10 20:17 ` Rick Jones
2005-10-10 20:58 ` Roland Dreier
2005-10-10 21:22 ` Rick Jones
2005-10-10 21:26 ` Grant Grundler
2005-10-10 23:30 ` Grant Grundler
2005-10-11 0:51 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-10 23:25 ` Matt Leininger
2005-10-10 23:38 ` Roland Dreier
2005-10-10 23:44 ` Matt Leininger
2005-10-10 23:53 ` Roland Dreier
2005-10-11 4:03 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
[not found] <E1EPIxF-0001Cp-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
2005-10-12 16:53 ` Roland Dreier
2005-10-12 18:28 ` Matt Leininger
2005-10-13 1:24 ` Matt Leininger
2005-10-13 1:48 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52u0fod7jc.fsf@cisco.com \
--to=rolandd@cisco.com \
--cc=mlleinin@hpcn.ca.sandia.gov \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openib-general@openib.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.