From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>,
Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@gmail.com>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] [media] stv090x: remove indent levels in stv090x_get_coldlock()
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:45:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53073C72.1060807@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140221085001.GA13078@elgon.mountain>
Am 21.02.2014 09:50, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> This code is needlessly complicated and checkpatch.pl complains that we
> go over the 80 characters per line limit.
>
> If we flip the "if (!lock) {" test to "if (lock) return;" then we can
> remove an indent level from the rest of the function.
>
> We can add two returns in the "if (state->srate >= 10000000) {"
> condition and move the else statement back an additional indent level.
>
> There is another "if (!lock) {" check which can be removed since we have
> already checked "lock" and know it is zero at this point. This second
> check on "lock" is also a problem because it sets off a static checker
> warning. I have reviewed this code for some time to see if something
> else was intended, but have concluded that it was simply an oversight
> and should be removed. Removing this duplicative check gains us an
> third indent level.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
> v2: add the returns in the "if (state->srate >= 10000000) {" condition.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c
> index 23e872f84742..93f4979ea6e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c
> @@ -2146,7 +2146,7 @@ static int stv090x_get_coldlock(struct stv090x_state *state, s32 timeout_dmd)
>
> u32 reg;
> s32 car_step, steps, cur_step, dir, freq, timeout_lock;
> - int lock = 0;
> + int lock;
>
> if (state->srate >= 10000000)
> timeout_lock = timeout_dmd / 3;
> @@ -2154,98 +2154,96 @@ static int stv090x_get_coldlock(struct stv090x_state *state, s32 timeout_dmd)
> timeout_lock = timeout_dmd / 2;
>
> lock = stv090x_get_dmdlock(state, timeout_lock); /* cold start wait */
> - if (!lock) {
> - if (state->srate >= 10000000) {
> - if (stv090x_chk_tmg(state)) {
> - if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x1f) < 0)
> - goto err;
> - if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x15) < 0)
> - goto err;
> - lock = stv090x_get_dmdlock(state, timeout_dmd);
> - } else {
> - lock = 0;
> - }
> - } else {
> - if (state->srate <= 4000000)
> - car_step = 1000;
> - else if (state->srate <= 7000000)
> - car_step = 2000;
> - else if (state->srate <= 10000000)
> - car_step = 3000;
> - else
> - car_step = 5000;
> -
> - steps = (state->search_range / 1000) / car_step;
> - steps /= 2;
> - steps = 2 * (steps + 1);
> - if (steps < 0)
> - steps = 2;
> - else if (steps > 12)
> - steps = 12;
> -
> - cur_step = 1;
> - dir = 1;
> -
> - if (!lock) {
> - freq = state->frequency;
> - state->tuner_bw = stv090x_car_width(state->srate, state->rolloff) + state->srate;
> - while ((cur_step <= steps) && (!lock)) {
> - if (dir > 0)
> - freq += cur_step * car_step;
> - else
> - freq -= cur_step * car_step;
> -
> - /* Setup tuner */
> - if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 1) < 0)
> - goto err;
> + if (lock)
> + return lock;
>
> - if (state->config->tuner_set_frequency) {
> - if (state->config->tuner_set_frequency(fe, freq) < 0)
> - goto err_gateoff;
> - }
> + if (state->srate >= 10000000) {
> + if (stv090x_chk_tmg(state)) {
> + if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x1f) < 0)
> + goto err;
> + if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x15) < 0)
> + goto err;
> + return stv090x_get_dmdlock(state, timeout_dmd);
> + }
> + return 0;
> + }
>
> - if (state->config->tuner_set_bandwidth) {
> - if (state->config->tuner_set_bandwidth(fe, state->tuner_bw) < 0)
> - goto err_gateoff;
> - }
> + if (state->srate <= 4000000)
> + car_step = 1000;
> + else if (state->srate <= 7000000)
> + car_step = 2000;
> + else if (state->srate <= 10000000)
> + car_step = 3000;
> + else
> + car_step = 5000;
hi dan, just a hint
when you encounter large numbers like this: please format it in a way
that it is easy to to see if a number is missing like:
car_step = 5000;
if (state->srate <= 4000000) car_step = 1000;
else if (state->srate <= 7000000) car_step = 2000;
else (state->srate <= 10000000) car_step = 3000;
an other hint from the department of silly steps: do not add 0 in front
or you will searching for the bug a long time :)
just my 2 cents,
re,
wh
>
> - if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 0) < 0)
> - goto err;
> + steps = (state->search_range / 1000) / car_step;
> + steps /= 2;
> + steps = 2 * (steps + 1);
> + if (steps < 0)
> + steps = 2;
> + else if (steps > 12)
> + steps = 12;
>
> - msleep(50);
> + cur_step = 1;
> + dir = 1;
>
> - if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 1) < 0)
> - goto err;
> + freq = state->frequency;
> + state->tuner_bw = stv090x_car_width(state->srate, state->rolloff) + state->srate;
> + while ((cur_step <= steps) && (!lock)) {
> + if (dir > 0)
> + freq += cur_step * car_step;
> + else
> + freq -= cur_step * car_step;
>
> - if (state->config->tuner_get_status) {
> - if (state->config->tuner_get_status(fe, ®) < 0)
> - goto err_gateoff;
> - }
> + /* Setup tuner */
> + if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 1) < 0)
> + goto err;
>
> - if (reg)
> - dprintk(FE_DEBUG, 1, "Tuner phase locked");
> - else
> - dprintk(FE_DEBUG, 1, "Tuner unlocked");
> + if (state->config->tuner_set_frequency) {
> + if (state->config->tuner_set_frequency(fe, freq) < 0)
> + goto err_gateoff;
> + }
>
> - if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 0) < 0)
> - goto err;
> + if (state->config->tuner_set_bandwidth) {
> + if (state->config->tuner_set_bandwidth(fe, state->tuner_bw) < 0)
> + goto err_gateoff;
> + }
>
> - STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x1c);
> - if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, CFRINIT1, 0x00) < 0)
> - goto err;
> - if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, CFRINIT0, 0x00) < 0)
> - goto err;
> - if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x1f) < 0)
> - goto err;
> - if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x15) < 0)
> - goto err;
> - lock = stv090x_get_dmdlock(state, (timeout_dmd / 3));
> + if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 0) < 0)
> + goto err;
>
> - dir *= -1;
> - cur_step++;
> - }
> - }
> + msleep(50);
> +
> + if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 1) < 0)
> + goto err;
> +
> + if (state->config->tuner_get_status) {
> + if (state->config->tuner_get_status(fe, ®) < 0)
> + goto err_gateoff;
> }
> +
> + if (reg)
> + dprintk(FE_DEBUG, 1, "Tuner phase locked");
> + else
> + dprintk(FE_DEBUG, 1, "Tuner unlocked");
> +
> + if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 0) < 0)
> + goto err;
> +
> + STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x1c);
> + if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, CFRINIT1, 0x00) < 0)
> + goto err;
> + if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, CFRINIT0, 0x00) < 0)
> + goto err;
> + if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x1f) < 0)
> + goto err;
> + if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x15) < 0)
> + goto err;
> + lock = stv090x_get_dmdlock(state, (timeout_dmd / 3));
> +
> + dir *= -1;
> + cur_step++;
> }
>
> return lock;
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>,
Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@gmail.com>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] [media] stv090x: remove indent levels in stv090x_get_coldlock()
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:45:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53073C72.1060807@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140221085001.GA13078@elgon.mountain>
Am 21.02.2014 09:50, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> This code is needlessly complicated and checkpatch.pl complains that we
> go over the 80 characters per line limit.
>
> If we flip the "if (!lock) {" test to "if (lock) return;" then we can
> remove an indent level from the rest of the function.
>
> We can add two returns in the "if (state->srate >= 10000000) {"
> condition and move the else statement back an additional indent level.
>
> There is another "if (!lock) {" check which can be removed since we have
> already checked "lock" and know it is zero at this point. This second
> check on "lock" is also a problem because it sets off a static checker
> warning. I have reviewed this code for some time to see if something
> else was intended, but have concluded that it was simply an oversight
> and should be removed. Removing this duplicative check gains us an
> third indent level.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
> v2: add the returns in the "if (state->srate >= 10000000) {" condition.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c
> index 23e872f84742..93f4979ea6e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c
> @@ -2146,7 +2146,7 @@ static int stv090x_get_coldlock(struct stv090x_state *state, s32 timeout_dmd)
>
> u32 reg;
> s32 car_step, steps, cur_step, dir, freq, timeout_lock;
> - int lock = 0;
> + int lock;
>
> if (state->srate >= 10000000)
> timeout_lock = timeout_dmd / 3;
> @@ -2154,98 +2154,96 @@ static int stv090x_get_coldlock(struct stv090x_state *state, s32 timeout_dmd)
> timeout_lock = timeout_dmd / 2;
>
> lock = stv090x_get_dmdlock(state, timeout_lock); /* cold start wait */
> - if (!lock) {
> - if (state->srate >= 10000000) {
> - if (stv090x_chk_tmg(state)) {
> - if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x1f) < 0)
> - goto err;
> - if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x15) < 0)
> - goto err;
> - lock = stv090x_get_dmdlock(state, timeout_dmd);
> - } else {
> - lock = 0;
> - }
> - } else {
> - if (state->srate <= 4000000)
> - car_step = 1000;
> - else if (state->srate <= 7000000)
> - car_step = 2000;
> - else if (state->srate <= 10000000)
> - car_step = 3000;
> - else
> - car_step = 5000;
> -
> - steps = (state->search_range / 1000) / car_step;
> - steps /= 2;
> - steps = 2 * (steps + 1);
> - if (steps < 0)
> - steps = 2;
> - else if (steps > 12)
> - steps = 12;
> -
> - cur_step = 1;
> - dir = 1;
> -
> - if (!lock) {
> - freq = state->frequency;
> - state->tuner_bw = stv090x_car_width(state->srate, state->rolloff) + state->srate;
> - while ((cur_step <= steps) && (!lock)) {
> - if (dir > 0)
> - freq += cur_step * car_step;
> - else
> - freq -= cur_step * car_step;
> -
> - /* Setup tuner */
> - if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 1) < 0)
> - goto err;
> + if (lock)
> + return lock;
>
> - if (state->config->tuner_set_frequency) {
> - if (state->config->tuner_set_frequency(fe, freq) < 0)
> - goto err_gateoff;
> - }
> + if (state->srate >= 10000000) {
> + if (stv090x_chk_tmg(state)) {
> + if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x1f) < 0)
> + goto err;
> + if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x15) < 0)
> + goto err;
> + return stv090x_get_dmdlock(state, timeout_dmd);
> + }
> + return 0;
> + }
>
> - if (state->config->tuner_set_bandwidth) {
> - if (state->config->tuner_set_bandwidth(fe, state->tuner_bw) < 0)
> - goto err_gateoff;
> - }
> + if (state->srate <= 4000000)
> + car_step = 1000;
> + else if (state->srate <= 7000000)
> + car_step = 2000;
> + else if (state->srate <= 10000000)
> + car_step = 3000;
> + else
> + car_step = 5000;
hi dan, just a hint
when you encounter large numbers like this: please format it in a way
that it is easy to to see if a number is missing like:
car_step = 5000;
if (state->srate <= 4000000) car_step = 1000;
else if (state->srate <= 7000000) car_step = 2000;
else (state->srate <= 10000000) car_step = 3000;
an other hint from the department of silly steps: do not add 0 in front
or you will searching for the bug a long time :)
just my 2 cents,
re,
wh
>
> - if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 0) < 0)
> - goto err;
> + steps = (state->search_range / 1000) / car_step;
> + steps /= 2;
> + steps = 2 * (steps + 1);
> + if (steps < 0)
> + steps = 2;
> + else if (steps > 12)
> + steps = 12;
>
> - msleep(50);
> + cur_step = 1;
> + dir = 1;
>
> - if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 1) < 0)
> - goto err;
> + freq = state->frequency;
> + state->tuner_bw = stv090x_car_width(state->srate, state->rolloff) + state->srate;
> + while ((cur_step <= steps) && (!lock)) {
> + if (dir > 0)
> + freq += cur_step * car_step;
> + else
> + freq -= cur_step * car_step;
>
> - if (state->config->tuner_get_status) {
> - if (state->config->tuner_get_status(fe, ®) < 0)
> - goto err_gateoff;
> - }
> + /* Setup tuner */
> + if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 1) < 0)
> + goto err;
>
> - if (reg)
> - dprintk(FE_DEBUG, 1, "Tuner phase locked");
> - else
> - dprintk(FE_DEBUG, 1, "Tuner unlocked");
> + if (state->config->tuner_set_frequency) {
> + if (state->config->tuner_set_frequency(fe, freq) < 0)
> + goto err_gateoff;
> + }
>
> - if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 0) < 0)
> - goto err;
> + if (state->config->tuner_set_bandwidth) {
> + if (state->config->tuner_set_bandwidth(fe, state->tuner_bw) < 0)
> + goto err_gateoff;
> + }
>
> - STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x1c);
> - if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, CFRINIT1, 0x00) < 0)
> - goto err;
> - if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, CFRINIT0, 0x00) < 0)
> - goto err;
> - if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x1f) < 0)
> - goto err;
> - if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x15) < 0)
> - goto err;
> - lock = stv090x_get_dmdlock(state, (timeout_dmd / 3));
> + if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 0) < 0)
> + goto err;
>
> - dir *= -1;
> - cur_step++;
> - }
> - }
> + msleep(50);
> +
> + if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 1) < 0)
> + goto err;
> +
> + if (state->config->tuner_get_status) {
> + if (state->config->tuner_get_status(fe, ®) < 0)
> + goto err_gateoff;
> }
> +
> + if (reg)
> + dprintk(FE_DEBUG, 1, "Tuner phase locked");
> + else
> + dprintk(FE_DEBUG, 1, "Tuner unlocked");
> +
> + if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 0) < 0)
> + goto err;
> +
> + STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x1c);
> + if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, CFRINIT1, 0x00) < 0)
> + goto err;
> + if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, CFRINIT0, 0x00) < 0)
> + goto err;
> + if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x1f) < 0)
> + goto err;
> + if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x15) < 0)
> + goto err;
> + lock = stv090x_get_dmdlock(state, (timeout_dmd / 3));
> +
> + dir *= -1;
> + cur_step++;
> }
>
> return lock;
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-21 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-06 9:28 [patch] [media] stv090x: remove indent levels Dan Carpenter
2014-02-06 9:28 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-02-18 3:55 ` Manu Abraham
2014-02-18 3:55 ` Manu Abraham
2014-02-18 8:56 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-02-18 8:56 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-02-19 5:22 ` Manu Abraham
2014-02-19 5:34 ` Manu Abraham
2014-02-19 7:44 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-02-19 7:44 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-02-20 3:27 ` Manu Abraham
2014-02-20 3:39 ` Manu Abraham
2014-02-20 9:25 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-02-20 9:25 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-02-20 12:45 ` Manu Abraham
2014-02-20 12:57 ` Manu Abraham
2014-02-20 10:24 ` Hans Verkuil
2014-02-20 10:24 ` Hans Verkuil
2014-02-20 12:35 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-02-20 12:35 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-02-21 8:50 ` [patch v2] [media] stv090x: remove indent levels in stv090x_get_coldlock() Dan Carpenter
2014-02-21 8:50 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-02-21 11:45 ` walter harms [this message]
2014-02-21 11:45 ` walter harms
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53073C72.1060807@bfs.de \
--to=wharms@bfs.de \
--cc=abraham.manu@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=hans.verkuil@cisco.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=khoroshilov@ispras.ru \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.chehab@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.