From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de,
ffusco@redhat.com, tgraf@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/hash: swap parameters of crc32_u32()
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 05:16:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530B462E.9070009@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <530B449C.8030205@iogearbox.net>
On a totally different note, it would probably be a good idea to use
intrinsics more in the kernel where possible. Intrinsics do allow the
compiler to generate better scheduling.
The trick of course is that we'd want to have machinery that can fall
back to inline assembly if the compiler doesn't support the intrinsics,
and perhaps even to .bytes if needed. This pretty much involves a bunch
of compiler and assembler-probing machinery and then wrapping things in
neat little inline functions.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-24 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-21 10:33 [PATCH 2/3] x86/hash: swap parameters of crc32_u32() Jan Beulich
2014-02-22 12:09 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-02-24 8:03 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-24 10:22 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-02-24 10:53 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-24 11:46 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-02-24 12:16 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-24 12:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-24 12:41 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-24 12:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-24 13:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-24 13:07 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-24 13:09 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-02-24 13:16 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2014-02-24 12:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-25 20:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-25 20:34 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-02-25 20:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-26 9:29 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-26 16:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=530B462E.9070009@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=borkmann@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=ffusco@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tgraf@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.