From: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
To: florian.vaussard@epfl.ch, Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Benoit Cousson <bcousson@baylibre.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: OMAP4: Fix gpmc_fck clock
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:05:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530D2FC9.2010800@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <530C4FED.80403@epfl.ch>
Florian,
On 02/25/2014 02:10 AM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
> On 02/25/2014 07:26 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> Quoting Florian Vaussard (2014-02-23 21:44:25)
>>> On 02/23/2014 10:23 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>>>> Quoting Florian Vaussard (2014-02-19 11:26:43)
>>>>>
>>>>> On 02/19/2014 05:22 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
>>>>>> On 02/19/2014 11:15 AM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Trying to get my SMSC9221 working on OMAP4 with DT,
>>>>>>> I faced a misconfigured gpmc_fck (dummy clock set to 0)
>>>>>>> resulting in serveral division-by-zero, misconfigured
>>>>>>> timings and driver lost in the La La Land.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To solve this, patch 1 removes gpmc_fck from the dummy
>>>>>>> clocks, and patch 2 adds the gpmc_fck DT node and
>>>>>>> reference it from the gpmc node.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tested on DuoVero/Parlor (OMAP4430) with SMSC9221.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can't test GPMC myself, but other than that, this set looks good to go.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you. Would you like more test coverage by other people? I would
>>>>> like to see this in -rc if possible, as it is needed to boot my OMAP4
>>>>> system.
>>>>
>>>> What OMAP4 system is this? Is this a regression for board that already
>>>> has support merged into mainline?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, it is not yet merged into mainline. I was planning to post the DTS
>>> this week, when most issues are cleared. Looking at the current mainline
>>> boards, no one seems to use the GPMC, so I am just the first one to hit
>>> this issue.
>>
>> OK, well typically the later -rc's are for fixing observed regressions.
>> Since your platform is not yet merged in then it's probably fine to push
>> this for 3.15.
>>
>
> Fair enough. 3.15 is fine.
>
>> This also gives time to test the fix for other OMAP-ish processors.
>>
>
> I can do the v3, including OMAP5 and DRA7. But for DRA7, I will need
> someone with the TRM telling me where is connected gpmc_fclk (Suman?).
For DRA7, GPMC is connected off L3MAIN1_L3_GICLK (compared to
L3MAIN2_L3_GICLK on OMAP5), both of which are actually just L3_ICLK.
This is the l3_iclk_div in both the omap54xx-clocks.dtsi and
dra7xx-clocks.dtsi files.
regards
Suman
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: s-anna@ti.com (Suman Anna)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: OMAP4: Fix gpmc_fck clock
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:05:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530D2FC9.2010800@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <530C4FED.80403@epfl.ch>
Florian,
On 02/25/2014 02:10 AM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
> On 02/25/2014 07:26 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> Quoting Florian Vaussard (2014-02-23 21:44:25)
>>> On 02/23/2014 10:23 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>>>> Quoting Florian Vaussard (2014-02-19 11:26:43)
>>>>>
>>>>> On 02/19/2014 05:22 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
>>>>>> On 02/19/2014 11:15 AM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Trying to get my SMSC9221 working on OMAP4 with DT,
>>>>>>> I faced a misconfigured gpmc_fck (dummy clock set to 0)
>>>>>>> resulting in serveral division-by-zero, misconfigured
>>>>>>> timings and driver lost in the La La Land.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To solve this, patch 1 removes gpmc_fck from the dummy
>>>>>>> clocks, and patch 2 adds the gpmc_fck DT node and
>>>>>>> reference it from the gpmc node.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tested on DuoVero/Parlor (OMAP4430) with SMSC9221.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can't test GPMC myself, but other than that, this set looks good to go.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you. Would you like more test coverage by other people? I would
>>>>> like to see this in -rc if possible, as it is needed to boot my OMAP4
>>>>> system.
>>>>
>>>> What OMAP4 system is this? Is this a regression for board that already
>>>> has support merged into mainline?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, it is not yet merged into mainline. I was planning to post the DTS
>>> this week, when most issues are cleared. Looking at the current mainline
>>> boards, no one seems to use the GPMC, so I am just the first one to hit
>>> this issue.
>>
>> OK, well typically the later -rc's are for fixing observed regressions.
>> Since your platform is not yet merged in then it's probably fine to push
>> this for 3.15.
>>
>
> Fair enough. 3.15 is fine.
>
>> This also gives time to test the fix for other OMAP-ish processors.
>>
>
> I can do the v3, including OMAP5 and DRA7. But for DRA7, I will need
> someone with the TRM telling me where is connected gpmc_fclk (Suman?).
For DRA7, GPMC is connected off L3MAIN1_L3_GICLK (compared to
L3MAIN2_L3_GICLK on OMAP5), both of which are actually just L3_ICLK.
This is the l3_iclk_div in both the omap54xx-clocks.dtsi and
dra7xx-clocks.dtsi files.
regards
Suman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-26 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-19 9:15 [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: OMAP4: Fix gpmc_fck clock Florian Vaussard
2014-02-19 9:15 ` Florian Vaussard
2014-02-19 9:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] CLK: TI: OMAP4: Remove gpmc_fck from dummy clocks Florian Vaussard
2014-02-19 9:15 ` Florian Vaussard
2014-02-19 9:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: DTS: OMAP4: Use l3_ick for the gpmc node Florian Vaussard
2014-02-19 9:15 ` Florian Vaussard
2014-02-19 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: OMAP4: Fix gpmc_fck clock Tero Kristo
2014-02-19 16:22 ` Tero Kristo
2014-02-19 19:26 ` Florian Vaussard
2014-02-19 19:26 ` Florian Vaussard
2014-02-20 9:51 ` Tero Kristo
2014-02-20 9:51 ` Tero Kristo
2014-02-21 23:23 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-02-21 23:23 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-02-23 20:36 ` Florian Vaussard
2014-02-23 20:36 ` Florian Vaussard
[not found] ` <20140223212309.22529.75068@quantum>
2014-02-24 5:44 ` Florian Vaussard
2014-02-24 5:44 ` Florian Vaussard
[not found] ` <20140225062615.22529.88499@quantum>
2014-02-25 8:10 ` Florian Vaussard
2014-02-25 8:10 ` Florian Vaussard
2014-02-26 0:05 ` Suman Anna [this message]
2014-02-26 0:05 ` Suman Anna
2014-02-26 5:11 ` Florian Vaussard
2014-02-26 5:11 ` Florian Vaussard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=530D2FC9.2010800@ti.com \
--to=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=bcousson@baylibre.com \
--cc=florian.vaussard@epfl.ch \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.