From: srinivas.kandagatla@st.com (srinivas kandagatla)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] pinctrl: st: add pinctrl support for the STiH407 SoC
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 10:43:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5319A2D2.7090700@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394185272-26054-3-git-send-email-maxime.coquelin@st.com>
Hi Peppe/Maxime,
On 07/03/14 09:41, Maxime COQUELIN wrote:
> From: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>
>
> This patch adds the initial support for pinctrl based on H407 SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
> index 9fb66aa..9e9b6ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
> @@ -1580,6 +1580,10 @@ static struct of_device_id st_pctl_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "st,stih416-rear-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
> { .compatible = "st,stih416-fvdp-fe-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
> { .compatible = "st,stih416-fvdp-lite-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
> + { .compatible = "st,stih407-sbc-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
> + { .compatible = "st,stih407-front-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
> + { .compatible = "st,stih407-rear-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
> + { .compatible = "st,stih407-flash-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
In the follow on patch this is changed to stih407_flashdata.
Why should this not be done in this patch itself.
> { /* sentinel */ }
> };
>
Other than that the patch looks Ok to me.
Acked-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@st.com>
Thanks,
srini
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: srinivas kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@st.com>
To: Maxime COQUELIN <maxime.coquelin@st.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Stuart Menefy <stuart.menefy@st.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kernel@stlinux.com
Cc: lee.jones@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] pinctrl: st: add pinctrl support for the STiH407 SoC
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 10:43:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5319A2D2.7090700@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394185272-26054-3-git-send-email-maxime.coquelin@st.com>
Hi Peppe/Maxime,
On 07/03/14 09:41, Maxime COQUELIN wrote:
> From: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>
>
> This patch adds the initial support for pinctrl based on H407 SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
> index 9fb66aa..9e9b6ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
> @@ -1580,6 +1580,10 @@ static struct of_device_id st_pctl_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "st,stih416-rear-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
> { .compatible = "st,stih416-fvdp-fe-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
> { .compatible = "st,stih416-fvdp-lite-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
> + { .compatible = "st,stih407-sbc-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
> + { .compatible = "st,stih407-front-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
> + { .compatible = "st,stih407-rear-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
> + { .compatible = "st,stih407-flash-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
In the follow on patch this is changed to stih407_flashdata.
Why should this not be done in this patch itself.
> { /* sentinel */ }
> };
>
Other than that the patch looks Ok to me.
Acked-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@st.com>
Thanks,
srini
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: srinivas kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@st.com>
To: Maxime COQUELIN <maxime.coquelin@st.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Stuart Menefy <stuart.menefy@st.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <kernel@stlinux.com>
Cc: <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] pinctrl: st: add pinctrl support for the STiH407 SoC
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 10:43:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5319A2D2.7090700@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394185272-26054-3-git-send-email-maxime.coquelin@st.com>
Hi Peppe/Maxime,
On 07/03/14 09:41, Maxime COQUELIN wrote:
> From: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>
>
> This patch adds the initial support for pinctrl based on H407 SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
> index 9fb66aa..9e9b6ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
> @@ -1580,6 +1580,10 @@ static struct of_device_id st_pctl_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "st,stih416-rear-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
> { .compatible = "st,stih416-fvdp-fe-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
> { .compatible = "st,stih416-fvdp-lite-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
> + { .compatible = "st,stih407-sbc-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
> + { .compatible = "st,stih407-front-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
> + { .compatible = "st,stih407-rear-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
> + { .compatible = "st,stih407-flash-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
In the follow on patch this is changed to stih407_flashdata.
Why should this not be done in this patch itself.
> { /* sentinel */ }
> };
>
Other than that the patch looks Ok to me.
Acked-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@st.com>
Thanks,
srini
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-07 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-07 9:41 [PATCH v2 0/5] Add STiH407 SoC and reference board support Maxime COQUELIN
2014-03-07 9:41 ` Maxime COQUELIN
2014-03-07 9:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ARM: STi: Add STiH407 SoC support Maxime COQUELIN
2014-03-07 9:41 ` Maxime COQUELIN
2014-03-07 9:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] pinctrl: st: add pinctrl support for the STiH407 SoC Maxime COQUELIN
2014-03-07 9:41 ` Maxime COQUELIN
2014-03-07 10:43 ` srinivas kandagatla [this message]
2014-03-07 10:43 ` srinivas kandagatla
2014-03-07 10:43 ` srinivas kandagatla
2014-03-07 9:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] pinctrl: st: Enhance the controller to manage unavailable registers Maxime COQUELIN
2014-03-07 9:41 ` Maxime COQUELIN
2014-03-07 10:37 ` srinivas kandagatla
2014-03-07 10:37 ` srinivas kandagatla
2014-03-07 10:37 ` srinivas kandagatla
2014-03-07 10:41 ` srinivas kandagatla
2014-03-07 10:41 ` srinivas kandagatla
2014-03-07 10:41 ` srinivas kandagatla
2014-03-07 11:28 ` Maxime Coquelin
2014-03-07 11:28 ` Maxime Coquelin
2014-03-07 11:28 ` Maxime Coquelin
2014-03-07 11:26 ` srinivas kandagatla
2014-03-07 11:26 ` srinivas kandagatla
2014-03-07 11:26 ` srinivas kandagatla
2014-03-07 9:41 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: dts: Add STiH407 SoC support Maxime COQUELIN
2014-03-07 9:41 ` Maxime COQUELIN
2014-03-07 9:41 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: dts: STiH407: Add B2120 board support Maxime COQUELIN
2014-03-07 9:41 ` Maxime COQUELIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5319A2D2.7090700@st.com \
--to=srinivas.kandagatla@st.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.