All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] scripts: add sample model file for Coverity Scan
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 13:46:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5329918C.8090403@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d2hi4ktz.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>

Il 19/03/2014 10:08, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
>> It probably would make static analysis a bit less powerful or will
>> return more false positives.  The NULL return for realloc (in the
>> "free" case) already causes some.  So I'm undecided between a more
>> correct model and a more selective one (with a fat comment).
>
> I can't see how lying to the analyzer could make it more powerful :)
> It can, however, suppress false positives.  Scan and find out how many?

Full model (g_malloc returns NULL for 0 argument) => 750 defects

Posted model (g_malloc never returns NULL)        => 702 defects
		-59 NULL_RETURNS defects
		 -1 REVERSE_INULL defects
		+12 TAINTED_SCALAR defects

Reduced model (g_realloc never frees)             => 690 defects
		-12 NULL_RETURNS defects

Of course, silly me, I threw away the results of the analysis for the 
full model.  I'll now rerun it and look for false negatives caused by 
the reduced model.

Paolo


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] scripts: add sample model file for Coverity Scan
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 13:46:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5329918C.8090403@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d2hi4ktz.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>

Il 19/03/2014 10:08, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
>> It probably would make static analysis a bit less powerful or will
>> return more false positives.  The NULL return for realloc (in the
>> "free" case) already causes some.  So I'm undecided between a more
>> correct model and a more selective one (with a fat comment).
>
> I can't see how lying to the analyzer could make it more powerful :)
> It can, however, suppress false positives.  Scan and find out how many?

Full model (g_malloc returns NULL for 0 argument) => 750 defects

Posted model (g_malloc never returns NULL)        => 702 defects
		-59 NULL_RETURNS defects
		 -1 REVERSE_INULL defects
		+12 TAINTED_SCALAR defects

Reduced model (g_realloc never frees)             => 690 defects
		-12 NULL_RETURNS defects

Of course, silly me, I threw away the results of the analysis for the 
full model.  I'll now rerun it and look for false negatives caused by 
the reduced model.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-19 12:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-18 17:03 [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] scripts: add sample model file for Coverity Scan Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-18 17:03 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-18 18:40 ` [Qemu-trivial] " Markus Armbruster
2014-03-18 18:40   ` Markus Armbruster
2014-03-19  7:03   ` [Qemu-trivial] " Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-19  7:03     ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-19  9:08     ` [Qemu-trivial] " Markus Armbruster
2014-03-19  9:08       ` Markus Armbruster
2014-03-19 12:46       ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-03-19 12:46         ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-19 13:56         ` [Qemu-trivial] " Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-19 13:56           ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-19 14:57           ` [Qemu-trivial] " Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-19 14:57             ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-19 15:56             ` [Qemu-trivial] " Markus Armbruster
2014-03-19 15:56               ` Markus Armbruster
2014-03-19 16:47               ` [Qemu-trivial] " Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-19 16:47                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-19  9:36 ` [Qemu-trivial] " Kevin Wolf
2014-03-19  9:36   ` Kevin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5329918C.8090403@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.