From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 11:12:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5334078A.9010408@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <533163D4.6030205@linaro.org>
Hi Hanjun,
On 25/03/14 11:09, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi Sudeep,
>
> On 2014-3-25 18:00, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Hi Hanjun,
>>
>> On 25/03/14 09:00, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> After commit 74397174989e5 (arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries),
>>> I still get a duplicate Power management options section in linux-next
>>> git repo, may be due to some merge conflicts, anyway, fix that in this
>>> patch.
>>>
>> I reported this and Mark Brown posted the patch[1].
>> I assumed it is already pulled, but looks like that's not the case.
> [...]
>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg314472.html
[...]
> here is the link:
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>
Just had a look at the linux-next tree and looks like the original commit:
"cpufreq: enable ARM drivers on arm64" is pulled by both Catalin and Rafael
which has resulted in the fixup patch[1] not removing the duplicate entry
cleanly.
If not too late it better to ask either Rafael or Catalin to drop both patches
from their tree, instead of creating 4 patches in total to enable cpufreq :)
Regards,
Sudeep
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 11:12:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5334078A.9010408@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <533163D4.6030205@linaro.org>
Hi Hanjun,
On 25/03/14 11:09, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi Sudeep,
>
> On 2014-3-25 18:00, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Hi Hanjun,
>>
>> On 25/03/14 09:00, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> After commit 74397174989e5 (arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries),
>>> I still get a duplicate Power management options section in linux-next
>>> git repo, may be due to some merge conflicts, anyway, fix that in this
>>> patch.
>>>
>> I reported this and Mark Brown posted the patch[1].
>> I assumed it is already pulled, but looks like that's not the case.
> [...]
>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg314472.html
[...]
> here is the link:
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>
Just had a look at the linux-next tree and looks like the original commit:
"cpufreq: enable ARM drivers on arm64" is pulled by both Catalin and Rafael
which has resulted in the fixup patch[1] not removing the duplicate entry
cleanly.
If not too late it better to ask either Rafael or Catalin to drop both patches
from their tree, instead of creating 4 patches in total to enable cpufreq :)
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-27 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-25 9:00 [PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again Hanjun Guo
2014-03-25 9:00 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-03-25 10:00 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Sudeep Holla
2014-03-25 10:00 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-03-25 11:09 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-03-25 11:09 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-03-27 11:12 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2014-03-27 11:12 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-03-27 12:34 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-03-27 12:34 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-03-27 15:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-27 15:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-03 8:35 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-04-03 8:35 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-04-03 8:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-04-03 8:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-04-03 8:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-04-03 8:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-04-03 9:27 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-04-03 9:27 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-04-03 9:30 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-04-03 9:30 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-04-03 9:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-04-03 9:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-04-03 11:01 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-04-03 11:01 ` Hanjun Guo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-04-02 1:25 arm64/cqufreq Kconfig error with v3.14-3893-gc12e69c6aaf7 Josh Boyer
2014-04-02 5:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-04-02 14:40 ` [PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again Josh Boyer
2014-04-02 14:40 ` Josh Boyer
2014-04-03 4:23 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-04-03 4:23 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5334078A.9010408@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.