* A issue when migrating a process's memory using cgroup
@ 2014-04-10 7:34 xiexiangyou
[not found] ` <53464970.8060404-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: xiexiangyou @ 2014-04-10 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Cc: zhouxiangjiu-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA,
luonengjun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA
Hi all,
I met a problem when I migrate a process's memory using cgroup.
Two processes, process A and Process B. Process A has 20G memory, I migrate it from node0 to node1, by writing "1" to "cpuset.mems".
It will consume 20s time. At the time, I write process B's "cpuset.cpus" to bind the cpus. But setting "cpuset.cpus" is block untill
the first operation is finished.
So I read the cpuset code in kernel. In the function of "cpuset_write_resmask", Common handling for a write to a "cpus" or "mems" file,
It grabs the "cgroup_mutex" first, and release it until finish writing "cpus" or "mems". But if migrate large size memory
of a process using cpuset, it will consume much time. At the time, other handling for write to "cpuset.cpus" and "cpuset.mems"
will blocked because of "cgroup_mutex".
In this case, I think the "cgroup_mutex" in "cpuset_write_resmask" should be replace by littler granularity lock.
Regards,
-xie
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: A issue when migrating a process's memory using cgroup
[not found] ` <53464970.8060404-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2014-04-10 8:04 ` Li Zefan
[not found] ` <534650AB.4070709-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Li Zefan @ 2014-04-10 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xiexiangyou
Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
zhouxiangjiu-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA,
luonengjun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA
On 2014/4/10 15:34, xiexiangyou wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I met a problem when I migrate a process's memory using cgroup.
> Two processes, process A and Process B. Process A has 20G memory, I migrate it from node0 to node1, by writing "1" to "cpuset.mems".
> It will consume 20s time. At the time, I write process B's "cpuset.cpus" to bind the cpus. But setting "cpuset.cpus" is block untill
> the first operation is finished.
>
>
> So I read the cpuset code in kernel. In the function of "cpuset_write_resmask", Common handling for a write to a "cpus" or "mems" file,
> It grabs the "cgroup_mutex" first, and release it until finish writing "cpus" or "mems". But if migrate large size memory
> of a process using cpuset, it will consume much time. At the time, other handling for write to "cpuset.cpus" and "cpuset.mems"
> will blocked because of "cgroup_mutex".
>
> In this case, I think the "cgroup_mutex" in "cpuset_write_resmask" should be replace by littler granularity lock.
>
Yeah, in newer kernels we no longer grab cgroup_mutex in cpuset_write_resmask().
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: A issue when migrating a process's memory using cgroup
[not found] ` <534650AB.4070709-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2014-04-10 8:28 ` Li Zefan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Li Zefan @ 2014-04-10 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xiexiangyou
Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
zhouxiangjiu-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA,
luonengjun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA
On 2014/4/10 16:04, Li Zefan wrote:
> On 2014/4/10 15:34, xiexiangyou wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I met a problem when I migrate a process's memory using cgroup.
>> Two processes, process A and Process B. Process A has 20G memory, I migrate it from node0 to node1, by writing "1" to "cpuset.mems".
>> It will consume 20s time. At the time, I write process B's "cpuset.cpus" to bind the cpus. But setting "cpuset.cpus" is block untill
>> the first operation is finished.
>>
>>
>> So I read the cpuset code in kernel. In the function of "cpuset_write_resmask", Common handling for a write to a "cpus" or "mems" file,
>> It grabs the "cgroup_mutex" first, and release it until finish writing "cpus" or "mems". But if migrate large size memory
>> of a process using cpuset, it will consume much time. At the time, other handling for write to "cpuset.cpus" and "cpuset.mems"
>> will blocked because of "cgroup_mutex".
>>
>> In this case, I think the "cgroup_mutex" in "cpuset_write_resmask" should be replace by littler granularity lock.
>>
>
> Yeah, in newer kernels we no longer grab cgroup_mutex in cpuset_write_resmask().
>
But it will still block, because cpuset_mutex is still a global lock,
not a per cpuset lock.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-04-10 8:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-04-10 7:34 A issue when migrating a process's memory using cgroup xiexiangyou
[not found] ` <53464970.8060404-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-10 8:04 ` Li Zefan
[not found] ` <534650AB.4070709-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-10 8:28 ` Li Zefan
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.