* A issue when migrating a process's memory using cgroup
@ 2014-04-10 7:34 xiexiangyou
[not found] ` <53464970.8060404-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: xiexiangyou @ 2014-04-10 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Cc: zhouxiangjiu-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA,
luonengjun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA
Hi all,
I met a problem when I migrate a process's memory using cgroup.
Two processes, process A and Process B. Process A has 20G memory, I migrate it from node0 to node1, by writing "1" to "cpuset.mems".
It will consume 20s time. At the time, I write process B's "cpuset.cpus" to bind the cpus. But setting "cpuset.cpus" is block untill
the first operation is finished.
So I read the cpuset code in kernel. In the function of "cpuset_write_resmask", Common handling for a write to a "cpus" or "mems" file,
It grabs the "cgroup_mutex" first, and release it until finish writing "cpus" or "mems". But if migrate large size memory
of a process using cpuset, it will consume much time. At the time, other handling for write to "cpuset.cpus" and "cpuset.mems"
will blocked because of "cgroup_mutex".
In this case, I think the "cgroup_mutex" in "cpuset_write_resmask" should be replace by littler granularity lock.
Regards,
-xie
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread[parent not found: <53464970.8060404-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: A issue when migrating a process's memory using cgroup [not found] ` <53464970.8060404-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> @ 2014-04-10 8:04 ` Li Zefan [not found] ` <534650AB.4070709-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Li Zefan @ 2014-04-10 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: xiexiangyou Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, zhouxiangjiu-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA, luonengjun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA On 2014/4/10 15:34, xiexiangyou wrote: > Hi all, > > I met a problem when I migrate a process's memory using cgroup. > Two processes, process A and Process B. Process A has 20G memory, I migrate it from node0 to node1, by writing "1" to "cpuset.mems". > It will consume 20s time. At the time, I write process B's "cpuset.cpus" to bind the cpus. But setting "cpuset.cpus" is block untill > the first operation is finished. > > > So I read the cpuset code in kernel. In the function of "cpuset_write_resmask", Common handling for a write to a "cpus" or "mems" file, > It grabs the "cgroup_mutex" first, and release it until finish writing "cpus" or "mems". But if migrate large size memory > of a process using cpuset, it will consume much time. At the time, other handling for write to "cpuset.cpus" and "cpuset.mems" > will blocked because of "cgroup_mutex". > > In this case, I think the "cgroup_mutex" in "cpuset_write_resmask" should be replace by littler granularity lock. > Yeah, in newer kernels we no longer grab cgroup_mutex in cpuset_write_resmask(). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <534650AB.4070709-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: A issue when migrating a process's memory using cgroup [not found] ` <534650AB.4070709-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> @ 2014-04-10 8:28 ` Li Zefan 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Li Zefan @ 2014-04-10 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: xiexiangyou Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, zhouxiangjiu-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA, luonengjun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA On 2014/4/10 16:04, Li Zefan wrote: > On 2014/4/10 15:34, xiexiangyou wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I met a problem when I migrate a process's memory using cgroup. >> Two processes, process A and Process B. Process A has 20G memory, I migrate it from node0 to node1, by writing "1" to "cpuset.mems". >> It will consume 20s time. At the time, I write process B's "cpuset.cpus" to bind the cpus. But setting "cpuset.cpus" is block untill >> the first operation is finished. >> >> >> So I read the cpuset code in kernel. In the function of "cpuset_write_resmask", Common handling for a write to a "cpus" or "mems" file, >> It grabs the "cgroup_mutex" first, and release it until finish writing "cpus" or "mems". But if migrate large size memory >> of a process using cpuset, it will consume much time. At the time, other handling for write to "cpuset.cpus" and "cpuset.mems" >> will blocked because of "cgroup_mutex". >> >> In this case, I think the "cgroup_mutex" in "cpuset_write_resmask" should be replace by littler granularity lock. >> > > Yeah, in newer kernels we no longer grab cgroup_mutex in cpuset_write_resmask(). > But it will still block, because cpuset_mutex is still a global lock, not a per cpuset lock. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-04-10 8:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-04-10 7:34 A issue when migrating a process's memory using cgroup xiexiangyou
[not found] ` <53464970.8060404-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-10 8:04 ` Li Zefan
[not found] ` <534650AB.4070709-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-10 8:28 ` Li Zefan
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.