* [ath9k-devel] support for 80211k (Kathiravan)
@ 2014-04-11 7:33 Pradeep Reddy
2014-04-11 8:05 ` Kathiravan
2014-04-11 10:19 ` Kathiravan
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pradeep Reddy @ 2014-04-11 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath9k-devel
Kathiravan,
There is no support for 802.11k in ath9k.
--
Pradeep
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/attachments/20140411/c3988888/attachment.htm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [ath9k-devel] support for 80211k (Kathiravan)
2014-04-11 7:33 [ath9k-devel] support for 80211k (Kathiravan) Pradeep Reddy
@ 2014-04-11 8:05 ` Kathiravan
2014-04-11 10:19 ` Kathiravan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kathiravan @ 2014-04-11 8:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath9k-devel
Pradeep Reddy <pradeepreddy.iit <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> Kathiravan,
> There is no support for 802.11k in ath9k.
> --
> Pradeep
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ath9k-devel mailing list
> ath9k-devel <at> lists.ath9k.org
> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
>
Hi Pradeep,
So u r telling i cant able to proceed with this( cant i generate those
action frames mentioned in 802.11k)?? any patches can i get or any other
module like ath10k supports??? please give some suggestions on this!!!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [ath9k-devel] support for 80211k (Kathiravan)
2014-04-11 7:33 [ath9k-devel] support for 80211k (Kathiravan) Pradeep Reddy
2014-04-11 8:05 ` Kathiravan
@ 2014-04-11 10:19 ` Kathiravan
2014-04-11 13:58 ` Oleksij Rempel
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kathiravan @ 2014-04-11 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath9k-devel
Pradeep Reddy <pradeepreddy.iit <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> Kathiravan,
> There is no support for 802.11k in ath9k.
> --
> Pradeep
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ath9k-devel mailing list
> ath9k-devel <at> lists.ath9k.org
> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
>
Hi Pradeep,
Thanks much for your prompt reply.
I just want to understand if there is any dependency on firmware for
implementation of 802.11k.
What i understand is that we need to send the action frame command to the
firmware and the firmware takes the initiative to send the packet OTA.
Is my understanding correct?
For example to send the ADDBA request the below is the command which we send
to the firmware.
#define HostCmd_CMD_11N_ADDBA_REQ 0x00ce
For 802.11k implementation i reckon the corresponding Action command to be
present in the firmware to support this feature.Am i right?
Looking forward for your valuable comments.
Regards,
Kathiravan T.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [ath9k-devel] support for 80211k (Kathiravan)
2014-04-11 10:19 ` Kathiravan
@ 2014-04-11 13:58 ` Oleksij Rempel
2014-04-14 3:44 ` kathiravan T
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Oleksij Rempel @ 2014-04-11 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath9k-devel
Am 11.04.2014 12:19, schrieb Kathiravan:
> Pradeep Reddy <pradeepreddy.iit <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>>
>>
>> Kathiravan,
>> There is no support for 802.11k in ath9k.
>> --
>> Pradeep
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ath9k-devel mailing list
>> ath9k-devel <at> lists.ath9k.org
>> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
>>
>
>
> Hi Pradeep,
>
> Thanks much for your prompt reply.
> I just want to understand if there is any dependency on firmware for
> implementation of 802.11k.
there is no firmware in ath9k. Only ath9k-htc need firmware. So, which
driver do you mean?
> What i understand is that we need to send the action frame command to the
> firmware and the firmware takes the initiative to send the packet OTA.
> Is my understanding correct?
>
> For example to send the ADDBA request the below is the command which we send
> to the firmware.
>
> #define HostCmd_CMD_11N_ADDBA_REQ 0x00ce
>
> For 802.11k implementation i reckon the corresponding Action command to be
> present in the firmware to support this feature.Am i right?
>
> Looking forward for your valuable comments.
>
> Regards,
> Kathiravan T.
--
Regards,
Oleksij
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 278 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/attachments/20140411/c4f9ceb6/attachment.pgp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-04-15 16:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-04-11 7:33 [ath9k-devel] support for 80211k (Kathiravan) Pradeep Reddy
2014-04-11 8:05 ` Kathiravan
2014-04-11 10:19 ` Kathiravan
2014-04-11 13:58 ` Oleksij Rempel
2014-04-14 3:44 ` kathiravan T
2014-04-15 16:21 ` selvam
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.