Re: [PATCHv2 07/11] ARM: OMAP3: Beagle: use PWM_LOOKUP to initialize struct pwm_lookup

[Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>]

On 04/15/2014 10:14 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:01:44AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> On 04/15/2014 12:59 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c | 10 ++--------
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c
>>> index f27e1ec90b5e..54c135a5b4f7 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c
>>> @@ -61,14 +61,8 @@
>>>  
>>>  static struct pwm_lookup pwm_lookup[] = {
>>>  	/* LEDB -> PMU_STAT */
>>> -	{
>>> -		.provider = "twl-pwmled",
>>> -		.index = 1,
>>> -		.dev_id = "leds_pwm",
>>> -		.con_id = "beagleboard::pmu_stat",
>>> -		.period = 7812500,
>>> -		.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL,
>>> -	},
>>> +	PWM_LOOKUP("twl-pwmled", 1, "leds_pwm", "beagleboard::pmu_stat",
>>> +		   7812500, PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL),
>>
>> Why do you need to do this in two steps?
>> In patch 4 you removed the existing PWM_LOOKUP() and now you are adding it back.
>> Would not be simpler if you just add the two new parameters in patch 4 (the
>> 812500, PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)?
> 
> Such an approach would apply an atomic change to both the infrastructure
> and the users.

Yes, I overlooked patch 6...
Just ignore my comment.

-- 
Péter