All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Capella <sebastian.capella@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Charles Garcia Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Antti Miettinen <ananaza@iki.fi>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>,
	Sebastian Capella <capellas@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 5/6] drivers: cpuidle: CPU idle ARM64 driver
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 17:48:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <536c25e8.82e6440a.6af4.ffffa583@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399399483-17112-6-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>

Quoting Lorenzo Pieralisi (2014-05-06 11:04:42)
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..fef1fad
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
...
> +/*

Is this intended to be kernel-docs?  If so, should maybe use the /** and
() after the function below.  Otherwise, should you remove the @ in the
argument list below?

> + * arm_enter_idle_state - Programs CPU to enter the specified state
> + *
> + * @dev: cpuidle device
> + * @drv: cpuidle driver
> + * @idx: state index
> + *
> + * Called from the CPUidle framework to program the device to the
> + * specified target state selected by the governor.
> + */
> +static int arm_enter_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> +                               struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int idx)

...

> +static int __init arm64_idle_init(void)
> +{
> +       int i, ret;
> +       const char *entry_method;
> +       struct device_node *idle_states_node;
> +       const struct cpu_suspend_ops *suspend_init;
> +       struct cpuidle_driver *drv = &arm64_idle_driver;
> +
> +       idle_states_node = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus/idle-states");
> +       if (!idle_states_node)
> +               return -ENOENT;
> +
> +       if (of_property_read_string(idle_states_node, "entry-method",
> +                                   &entry_method)) {
> +               pr_warn(" * %s missing entry-method property\n",
> +                           idle_states_node->full_name);
> +               of_node_put(idle_states_node);
> +               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +       }
> +
> +       suspend_init = get_suspend_ops(entry_method);
> +       if (!suspend_init) {
> +               pr_warn("Missing suspend initializer\n");
> +               of_node_put(idle_states_node);
> +               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +       }
> +
> +       /*
> +        * State at index 0 is standby wfi and considered standard
> +        * on all ARM platforms. If in some platforms simple wfi
> +        * can't be used as "state 0", DT bindings must be implemented
> +        * to work around this issue and allow installing a special
> +        * handler for idle state index 0.
> +        */
> +       drv->states[0].exit_latency = 1;
> +       drv->states[0].target_residency = 1;
> +       drv->states[0].flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID;
> +       strncpy(drv->states[0].name, "ARM WFI", CPUIDLE_NAME_LEN);
> +       strncpy(drv->states[0].desc, "ARM WFI", CPUIDLE_DESC_LEN);
> +
> +       drv->cpumask = (struct cpumask *) cpu_possible_mask;
> +       /*
> +        * Start at index 1, request idle state nodes to be filled
> +        */
> +       ret = of_init_idle_driver(drv, state_nodes, 1, true);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       if (suspend_init->init_fn(drv, state_nodes))
> +               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < drv->state_count; i++)
> +               drv->states[i].enter = arm_enter_idle_state;

Is this missing an of_node_put(idle_states_node)?

Thanks!

Sebastian

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sebastian.capella@linaro.org (Sebastian Capella)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC v3 5/6] drivers: cpuidle: CPU idle ARM64 driver
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 17:48:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <536c25e8.82e6440a.6af4.ffffa583@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399399483-17112-6-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>

Quoting Lorenzo Pieralisi (2014-05-06 11:04:42)
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..fef1fad
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
...
> +/*

Is this intended to be kernel-docs?  If so, should maybe use the /** and
() after the function below.  Otherwise, should you remove the @ in the
argument list below?

> + * arm_enter_idle_state - Programs CPU to enter the specified state
> + *
> + * @dev: cpuidle device
> + * @drv: cpuidle driver
> + * @idx: state index
> + *
> + * Called from the CPUidle framework to program the device to the
> + * specified target state selected by the governor.
> + */
> +static int arm_enter_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> +                               struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int idx)

...

> +static int __init arm64_idle_init(void)
> +{
> +       int i, ret;
> +       const char *entry_method;
> +       struct device_node *idle_states_node;
> +       const struct cpu_suspend_ops *suspend_init;
> +       struct cpuidle_driver *drv = &arm64_idle_driver;
> +
> +       idle_states_node = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus/idle-states");
> +       if (!idle_states_node)
> +               return -ENOENT;
> +
> +       if (of_property_read_string(idle_states_node, "entry-method",
> +                                   &entry_method)) {
> +               pr_warn(" * %s missing entry-method property\n",
> +                           idle_states_node->full_name);
> +               of_node_put(idle_states_node);
> +               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +       }
> +
> +       suspend_init = get_suspend_ops(entry_method);
> +       if (!suspend_init) {
> +               pr_warn("Missing suspend initializer\n");
> +               of_node_put(idle_states_node);
> +               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +       }
> +
> +       /*
> +        * State at index 0 is standby wfi and considered standard
> +        * on all ARM platforms. If in some platforms simple wfi
> +        * can't be used as "state 0", DT bindings must be implemented
> +        * to work around this issue and allow installing a special
> +        * handler for idle state index 0.
> +        */
> +       drv->states[0].exit_latency = 1;
> +       drv->states[0].target_residency = 1;
> +       drv->states[0].flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID;
> +       strncpy(drv->states[0].name, "ARM WFI", CPUIDLE_NAME_LEN);
> +       strncpy(drv->states[0].desc, "ARM WFI", CPUIDLE_DESC_LEN);
> +
> +       drv->cpumask = (struct cpumask *) cpu_possible_mask;
> +       /*
> +        * Start at index 1, request idle state nodes to be filled
> +        */
> +       ret = of_init_idle_driver(drv, state_nodes, 1, true);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       if (suspend_init->init_fn(drv, state_nodes))
> +               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < drv->state_count; i++)
> +               drv->states[i].enter = arm_enter_idle_state;

Is this missing an of_node_put(idle_states_node)?

Thanks!

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-09  0:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-06 18:04 [PATCH RFC v3 0/6] ARM generic idle states Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-05-06 18:04 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-05-06 18:04 ` [PATCH RFC v3 2/6] Documentation: devicetree: psci: define CPU suspend parameter Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-05-06 18:04   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-05-07 23:45   ` Sebastian Capella
2014-05-07 23:45     ` Sebastian Capella
2014-05-06 18:04 ` [PATCH RFC v3 3/6] drivers: cpuidle: implement OF based idle states infrastructure Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-05-06 18:04   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-05-08 23:12   ` Sebastian Capella
2014-05-08 23:12     ` Sebastian Capella
2014-05-09  9:47     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-05-09  9:47       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-05-09 12:04     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-05-09 12:04       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
     [not found] ` <1399399483-17112-1-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-06 18:04   ` [PATCH RFC v3 1/6] Documentation: arm: define DT idle states bindings Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-05-06 18:04     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-05-07 23:43     ` Sebastian Capella
2014-05-07 23:43       ` Sebastian Capella
2014-05-08  8:57       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-05-08  8:57         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-05-08 23:28         ` Sebastian Capella
2014-05-08 23:28           ` Sebastian Capella
2014-05-06 18:04   ` [PATCH RFC v3 4/6] arm64: add PSCI CPU_SUSPEND based cpu_suspend support Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-05-06 18:04     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-05-09 23:11     ` Sebastian Capella
2014-05-09 23:11       ` Sebastian Capella
2014-05-06 18:04   ` [PATCH RFC v3 5/6] drivers: cpuidle: CPU idle ARM64 driver Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-05-06 18:04     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-05-09  0:48     ` Sebastian Capella [this message]
2014-05-09  0:48       ` Sebastian Capella
2014-05-09  9:40       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-05-09  9:40         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-05-06 18:04 ` [PATCH RFC v3 6/6] arm64: boot: dts: update rtsm aemv8 dts with PSCI and idle states Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-05-06 18:04   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-05-09  0:51   ` Sebastian Capella
2014-05-09  0:51     ` Sebastian Capella

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=536c25e8.82e6440a.6af4.ffffa583@mx.google.com \
    --to=sebastian.capella@linaro.org \
    --cc=Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com \
    --cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
    --cc=ananaza@iki.fi \
    --cc=capellas@broadcom.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=khilman@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=nico@linaro.org \
    --cc=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.