From: Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
To: stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org,
thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Cc: linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
marcel-mitwqZ+T+m9Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: initial add of Colibri T30
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 13:49:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53727738.4080901@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d45ec5351ce8ef03256061bdc4b0ba673bd40c66.1400001937.git.stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org>
On 05/13/2014 11:27 AM, stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org wrote:
> This patch adds the device tree to support Toradex Colibri T30, a
> computer on module which can be used on different carrier boards.
>
> The module consists of a Tegra 30 SoC, two PMIC, DDR3L RAM, eMMC,
> a LM95245 temperature sensor and an AX88772B USB Ethernet
> Controller. Furthermore, there is a STMPE811 and SGTL5000 audio
> codec which are not yet supported. Anything that is not self
> contained on the module is disabled by default.
>
> The device tree for the Evaluation Board includes the modules
> device tree and enables the supported pheripherials of the carrier
> board (the Evaluation Board supports almost all of them).
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts
> +#include "tegra30-colibri.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "Toradex Colibri T30 on Colibri Evaluation Board";
> + compatible = "toradex,colibri_t30-eval-v3", "nvidia,tegra30";
That should include all the compatible values "inherited" from the
Colibri T30 module .dtsi file too.
> + aliases {
> + rtc0 = "/i2c@7000c000/rtc@68";
> + rtc1 = "/i2c@7000d000/tps65911@2d";
> + rtc2 = "/rtc@7000e000";
> + };
Wow, no shortage of RTCs!
> + /* SPI1: Colibri SSP */
> + spi@7000d400 {
> + status = "okay";
> + spi-max-frequency = <25000000>;
> + can0: can@0 {
> + compatible = "microchip,mcp2515";
> + reg = <0>;
> + clocks = <&clk16m>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&gpio>;
> + interrupts = <TEGRA_GPIO(S, 0) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + spi-max-frequency = <10000000>;
So this chip doesn't get confused by a faster clock frequency when its
chip-select line isn't asserted? I would have expected spi-max-frequency
for the bus to be the minimum value that any device on the bus would
tolerate.
> + /* EHCI instance 0: USB1_DP/N -> USBC_P/N */
> + usb@7d000000 {
> + status = "okay";
> + dr_mode = "otg";
The dr_mode property is only for the PHY node.
> + panel: panel {
> + compatible = "edt,et057090dhu", "simple-panel";
The panel-simple driver doesn't seem to know about that EDT panel. How
will it work out the display timings?
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri.dtsi
> +/ {
> + model = "Toradex Colibri T30";
> + compatible = "toradex,colibri_t30-v11b",
> + "toradex,colibri_t30-v11c",
> + "toradex,colibri_t30-v11d",
> + "toradex,colibri_t30", "nvidia,tegra30";
Do we really need all those compatible values? If those board revisions
are all SW-compatible, then you may as well write just:
compatible = "toradex,colibri_t30", "nvidia,tegra30";
> + aliases {
> + serial0 = &uarta;
> + serial1 = &uartd;
> + serial2 = &uartb;
> + };
tegra20.dtsi already sets the alias names for the serial ports. Previous
discussions settled on giving each on-chip UART a static name, rather
than renaming them per board.
> + pmc@7000e400 {
> + status = "okay";
The PMC node isn't disabled in tegra20.dtsi, so you don't need the
status property here.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: initial add of Colibri T30
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 13:49:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53727738.4080901@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d45ec5351ce8ef03256061bdc4b0ba673bd40c66.1400001937.git.stefan@agner.ch>
On 05/13/2014 11:27 AM, stefan at agner.ch wrote:
> This patch adds the device tree to support Toradex Colibri T30, a
> computer on module which can be used on different carrier boards.
>
> The module consists of a Tegra 30 SoC, two PMIC, DDR3L RAM, eMMC,
> a LM95245 temperature sensor and an AX88772B USB Ethernet
> Controller. Furthermore, there is a STMPE811 and SGTL5000 audio
> codec which are not yet supported. Anything that is not self
> contained on the module is disabled by default.
>
> The device tree for the Evaluation Board includes the modules
> device tree and enables the supported pheripherials of the carrier
> board (the Evaluation Board supports almost all of them).
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts
> +#include "tegra30-colibri.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "Toradex Colibri T30 on Colibri Evaluation Board";
> + compatible = "toradex,colibri_t30-eval-v3", "nvidia,tegra30";
That should include all the compatible values "inherited" from the
Colibri T30 module .dtsi file too.
> + aliases {
> + rtc0 = "/i2c at 7000c000/rtc at 68";
> + rtc1 = "/i2c at 7000d000/tps65911 at 2d";
> + rtc2 = "/rtc at 7000e000";
> + };
Wow, no shortage of RTCs!
> + /* SPI1: Colibri SSP */
> + spi at 7000d400 {
> + status = "okay";
> + spi-max-frequency = <25000000>;
> + can0: can at 0 {
> + compatible = "microchip,mcp2515";
> + reg = <0>;
> + clocks = <&clk16m>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&gpio>;
> + interrupts = <TEGRA_GPIO(S, 0) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + spi-max-frequency = <10000000>;
So this chip doesn't get confused by a faster clock frequency when its
chip-select line isn't asserted? I would have expected spi-max-frequency
for the bus to be the minimum value that any device on the bus would
tolerate.
> + /* EHCI instance 0: USB1_DP/N -> USBC_P/N */
> + usb at 7d000000 {
> + status = "okay";
> + dr_mode = "otg";
The dr_mode property is only for the PHY node.
> + panel: panel {
> + compatible = "edt,et057090dhu", "simple-panel";
The panel-simple driver doesn't seem to know about that EDT panel. How
will it work out the display timings?
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri.dtsi
> +/ {
> + model = "Toradex Colibri T30";
> + compatible = "toradex,colibri_t30-v11b",
> + "toradex,colibri_t30-v11c",
> + "toradex,colibri_t30-v11d",
> + "toradex,colibri_t30", "nvidia,tegra30";
Do we really need all those compatible values? If those board revisions
are all SW-compatible, then you may as well write just:
compatible = "toradex,colibri_t30", "nvidia,tegra30";
> + aliases {
> + serial0 = &uarta;
> + serial1 = &uartd;
> + serial2 = &uartb;
> + };
tegra20.dtsi already sets the alias names for the serial ports. Previous
discussions settled on giving each on-chip UART a static name, rather
than renaming them per board.
> + pmc at 7000e400 {
> + status = "okay";
The PMC node isn't disabled in tegra20.dtsi, so you don't need the
status property here.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: stefan@agner.ch, thierry.reding@gmail.com
Cc: linux@arm.linux.org.uk, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
marcel@ziswiler.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: initial add of Colibri T30
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 13:49:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53727738.4080901@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d45ec5351ce8ef03256061bdc4b0ba673bd40c66.1400001937.git.stefan@agner.ch>
On 05/13/2014 11:27 AM, stefan@agner.ch wrote:
> This patch adds the device tree to support Toradex Colibri T30, a
> computer on module which can be used on different carrier boards.
>
> The module consists of a Tegra 30 SoC, two PMIC, DDR3L RAM, eMMC,
> a LM95245 temperature sensor and an AX88772B USB Ethernet
> Controller. Furthermore, there is a STMPE811 and SGTL5000 audio
> codec which are not yet supported. Anything that is not self
> contained on the module is disabled by default.
>
> The device tree for the Evaluation Board includes the modules
> device tree and enables the supported pheripherials of the carrier
> board (the Evaluation Board supports almost all of them).
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts
> +#include "tegra30-colibri.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "Toradex Colibri T30 on Colibri Evaluation Board";
> + compatible = "toradex,colibri_t30-eval-v3", "nvidia,tegra30";
That should include all the compatible values "inherited" from the
Colibri T30 module .dtsi file too.
> + aliases {
> + rtc0 = "/i2c@7000c000/rtc@68";
> + rtc1 = "/i2c@7000d000/tps65911@2d";
> + rtc2 = "/rtc@7000e000";
> + };
Wow, no shortage of RTCs!
> + /* SPI1: Colibri SSP */
> + spi@7000d400 {
> + status = "okay";
> + spi-max-frequency = <25000000>;
> + can0: can@0 {
> + compatible = "microchip,mcp2515";
> + reg = <0>;
> + clocks = <&clk16m>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&gpio>;
> + interrupts = <TEGRA_GPIO(S, 0) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + spi-max-frequency = <10000000>;
So this chip doesn't get confused by a faster clock frequency when its
chip-select line isn't asserted? I would have expected spi-max-frequency
for the bus to be the minimum value that any device on the bus would
tolerate.
> + /* EHCI instance 0: USB1_DP/N -> USBC_P/N */
> + usb@7d000000 {
> + status = "okay";
> + dr_mode = "otg";
The dr_mode property is only for the PHY node.
> + panel: panel {
> + compatible = "edt,et057090dhu", "simple-panel";
The panel-simple driver doesn't seem to know about that EDT panel. How
will it work out the display timings?
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri.dtsi
> +/ {
> + model = "Toradex Colibri T30";
> + compatible = "toradex,colibri_t30-v11b",
> + "toradex,colibri_t30-v11c",
> + "toradex,colibri_t30-v11d",
> + "toradex,colibri_t30", "nvidia,tegra30";
Do we really need all those compatible values? If those board revisions
are all SW-compatible, then you may as well write just:
compatible = "toradex,colibri_t30", "nvidia,tegra30";
> + aliases {
> + serial0 = &uarta;
> + serial1 = &uartd;
> + serial2 = &uartb;
> + };
tegra20.dtsi already sets the alias names for the serial ports. Previous
discussions settled on giving each on-chip UART a static name, rather
than renaming them per board.
> + pmc@7000e400 {
> + status = "okay";
The PMC node isn't disabled in tegra20.dtsi, so you don't need the
status property here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-13 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-13 17:27 [PATCH 0/2] ARM: tegra: initial support for Colibri T30 stefan
2014-05-13 17:27 ` stefan
2014-05-13 17:27 ` stefan at agner.ch
2014-05-13 17:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: enable MCP251x CAN controller and DS1307 RTC stefan
2014-05-13 17:27 ` stefan
2014-05-13 17:27 ` stefan at agner.ch
[not found] ` <77cfca0a1769d867c8d2919f0040fbd785940fef.1400001937.git.stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-13 19:57 ` Stephen Warren
2014-05-13 19:57 ` Stephen Warren
2014-05-13 19:57 ` Stephen Warren
2014-05-13 17:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: initial add of Colibri T30 stefan
2014-05-13 17:27 ` stefan
2014-05-13 17:27 ` stefan at agner.ch
[not found] ` <d45ec5351ce8ef03256061bdc4b0ba673bd40c66.1400001937.git.stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-13 19:49 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2014-05-13 19:49 ` Stephen Warren
2014-05-13 19:49 ` Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <53727738.4080901-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-14 7:22 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2014-05-14 7:22 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2014-05-14 7:22 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2014-05-14 14:32 ` Thierry Reding
2014-05-14 14:32 ` Thierry Reding
2014-05-14 15:38 ` Stephen Warren
2014-05-14 15:38 ` Stephen Warren
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-05-14 16:16 Stefan Agner
[not found] ` <107aeb48982529858267cb85c792b35e-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-15 18:13 ` Stephen Warren
2014-05-15 18:13 ` Stephen Warren
2014-05-15 18:13 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53727738.4080901@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren-3lzwwm7+weoh9zmkesr00q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=marcel-mitwqZ+T+m9Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org \
--cc=thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.