From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: ath10k <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Rate vs Range graphs for ath10k through attentuator.
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 05:57:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53760B23.9000408@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87vbt56g61.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
On 05/16/2014 05:50 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> writes:
>
>> Just FYI...here's a graph of a UDP upload test through an attenuator.
>> The attenuator goes from 0 up to 95.5, though isolation is not perfect
>> so even at highest attenuation a small bit of signal gets through.
>>
>> One interesting thing to me is that ath10k does so well at very hot
>> signal strength. ath9k runs like crap with hot signal...
>>
>> AP is another of our systems, both are using my CT firmware, my 3.14.4+
>> kernel, and WLE900VX NICs. 32 stations were created and associated
>> on the station machine, but only one was actively sending any significant
>> data. AP system had single active AP vdev, one station interface that was
>> not connected. Traffic flow is station send to AP, AP sends back to station
>> machine on 1Gbps wired Ethernet connection. Both systems are mobile core-i7
>> CPU, 8GB RAM, etc.
>>
>> http://www.candelatech.com/examples/ath10k-rate-vs-range-udp-upload/
>>
>> Lots of graphs in the link above..the most useful ones are:
>>
>> http://www.candelatech.com/examples/ath10k-rate-vs-range-udp-upload/chart-0.png
>>
>> http://www.candelatech.com/examples/ath10k-rate-vs-range-udp-upload/chart-30.png
>>
>> The throughput is a bit spikey, possibly because I am only doing 5 second throughput
>> tests. Will run a 30-second one some day and hope that smooths out.
>
> Cool charts. Was this over the air or with cables?
Cables, have to run it through the attenuator...
Ben
>
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-16 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-15 18:53 Rate vs Range graphs for ath10k through attentuator Ben Greear
2014-05-16 12:50 ` Kalle Valo
2014-05-16 12:57 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2014-05-16 13:04 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53760B23.9000408@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.