[RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Gioh Kim]

Thanks for your advise, Michal Nazarewicz.

Having discuss with Joonsoo, I'm adding fallback allocation after __alloc_from_contiguous().
The fallback allocation works if CMA kernel options is turned on but CMA size is zero.

--------------------- 8< ------------------------

[RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Gioh Kim]

Thanks for your advise, Michal Nazarewicz.

Having discuss with Joonsoo, I'm adding fallback allocation after __alloc_from_contiguous().
The fallback allocation works if CMA kernel options is turned on but CMA size is zero.

--------------------- 8< ------------------------

>From 05e389683ddd07027e8acb61c25f3284f762300e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 14:16:20 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

If CMA is turned on and CMA size is set to zero, kernel should
behave as if CMA was not enabled at compile time.
Fallback allocation is added for CMA allocation failure.

Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
---
 arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c |   11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
index 18e98df..2a6c883 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
        unsigned long *bitmap;
        struct page *page;
        struct page **pages;
-       void *ptr;
+       void *ptr = NULL;
        int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_pages) * sizeof(long);

        bitmap = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -393,9 +393,10 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
        if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
                ptr = __alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, pool->size, prot, &page,
                                              atomic_pool_init);
-       else
+       if (!ptr)
                ptr = __alloc_remap_buffer(NULL, pool->size, gfp, prot, &page,
                                           atomic_pool_init);
+
        if (ptr) {
                int i;

@@ -703,8 +704,12 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
                addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
        else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
                addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot, &page, caller);
-       else
+       else {
                addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot, &page, caller);
+               if (!addr)
+                       addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot,
+                                                   &page, caller);
+       }

        if (addr)
                *handle = pfn_to_dma(dev, page_to_pfn(page));
--
1.7.9.5

Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Joonsoo Kim]

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 02:57:47PM +0900, Gioh Kim wrote:
> 
> Thanks for your advise, Michal Nazarewicz.
> 
> Having discuss with Joonsoo, I'm adding fallback allocation after __alloc_from_contiguous().
> The fallback allocation works if CMA kernel options is turned on but CMA size is zero.

Hello, Gioh.

I also mentioned the case where devices have their specific cma_area.
It means that this device needs memory with some contraint.
Although I'm not familiar with DMA infrastructure, I think that
we should handle this case.

How about below patch?

------------>8----------------
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
index 6b00be1..4023434 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
 	unsigned long *bitmap;
 	struct page *page;
 	struct page **pages;
-	void *ptr;
+	void *ptr = NULL;
 	int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_pages) * sizeof(long);
 
 	bitmap = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -393,7 +393,8 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
 		ptr = __alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, pool->size, prot, &page,
 					      atomic_pool_init);
-	else
+
+	if (!ptr)
 		ptr = __alloc_remap_buffer(NULL, pool->size, gfp, prot, &page,
 					   atomic_pool_init);
 	if (ptr) {
@@ -701,10 +702,22 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
 		addr = __alloc_simple_buffer(dev, size, gfp, &page);
 	else if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
 		addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
-	else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
-		addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot, &page, caller);
-	else
-		addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot, &page, caller);
+	else {
+		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA)) {
+			addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot,
+							&page, caller);
+			/*
+			 * Device specific cma_area means that
+			 * this device needs memory with some contraint.
+			 * So, we can't fall through general remap allocation.
+			 */
+			if (!addr && dev && dev->cma_area)
+				return NULL;
+		}
+
+		addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot,
+							&page, caller);
+	}
 
 	if (addr)
 		*handle = pfn_to_dma(dev, page_to_pfn(page));

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Joonsoo Kim]

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 02:57:47PM +0900, Gioh Kim wrote:
> 
> Thanks for your advise, Michal Nazarewicz.
> 
> Having discuss with Joonsoo, I'm adding fallback allocation after __alloc_from_contiguous().
> The fallback allocation works if CMA kernel options is turned on but CMA size is zero.

Hello, Gioh.

I also mentioned the case where devices have their specific cma_area.
It means that this device needs memory with some contraint.
Although I'm not familiar with DMA infrastructure, I think that
we should handle this case.

How about below patch?

------------>8----------------
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
index 6b00be1..4023434 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
 	unsigned long *bitmap;
 	struct page *page;
 	struct page **pages;
-	void *ptr;
+	void *ptr = NULL;
 	int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_pages) * sizeof(long);
 
 	bitmap = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -393,7 +393,8 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
 		ptr = __alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, pool->size, prot, &page,
 					      atomic_pool_init);
-	else
+
+	if (!ptr)
 		ptr = __alloc_remap_buffer(NULL, pool->size, gfp, prot, &page,
 					   atomic_pool_init);
 	if (ptr) {
@@ -701,10 +702,22 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
 		addr = __alloc_simple_buffer(dev, size, gfp, &page);
 	else if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
 		addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
-	else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
-		addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot, &page, caller);
-	else
-		addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot, &page, caller);
+	else {
+		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA)) {
+			addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot,
+							&page, caller);
+			/*
+			 * Device specific cma_area means that
+			 * this device needs memory with some contraint.
+			 * So, we can't fall through general remap allocation.
+			 */
+			if (!addr && dev && dev->cma_area)
+				return NULL;
+		}
+
+		addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot,
+							&page, caller);
+	}
 
 	if (addr)
 		*handle = pfn_to_dma(dev, page_to_pfn(page));

Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Gioh Kim]

That case, device-specific coherent memory allocation, is handled at dma_alloc_coherent in arm_dma_alloc.
__dma_alloc handles only general coherent memory allocation.

I'm sorry missing mention about it.


2014-05-20 i??i?? 3:52, Joonsoo Kim i?' e,?:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 02:57:47PM +0900, Gioh Kim wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for your advise, Michal Nazarewicz.
>>
>> Having discuss with Joonsoo, I'm adding fallback allocation after __alloc_from_contiguous().
>> The fallback allocation works if CMA kernel options is turned on but CMA size is zero.
>
> Hello, Gioh.
>
> I also mentioned the case where devices have their specific cma_area.
> It means that this device needs memory with some contraint.
> Although I'm not familiar with DMA infrastructure, I think that
> we should handle this case.
>
> How about below patch?
>
> ------------>8----------------
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 6b00be1..4023434 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>   	unsigned long *bitmap;
>   	struct page *page;
>   	struct page **pages;
> -	void *ptr;
> +	void *ptr = NULL;
>   	int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_pages) * sizeof(long);
>
>   	bitmap = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -393,7 +393,8 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>   	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
>   		ptr = __alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, pool->size, prot, &page,
>   					      atomic_pool_init);
> -	else
> +
> +	if (!ptr)
>   		ptr = __alloc_remap_buffer(NULL, pool->size, gfp, prot, &page,
>   					   atomic_pool_init);
>   	if (ptr) {
> @@ -701,10 +702,22 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
>   		addr = __alloc_simple_buffer(dev, size, gfp, &page);
>   	else if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
>   		addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
> -	else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
> -		addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot, &page, caller);
> -	else
> -		addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot, &page, caller);
> +	else {
> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA)) {
> +			addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot,
> +							&page, caller);
> +			/*
> +			 * Device specific cma_area means that
> +			 * this device needs memory with some contraint.
> +			 * So, we can't fall through general remap allocation.
> +			 */
> +			if (!addr && dev && dev->cma_area)
> +				return NULL;
> +		}
> +
> +		addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot,
> +							&page, caller);
> +	}
>
>   	if (addr)
>   		*handle = pfn_to_dma(dev, page_to_pfn(page));
>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Gioh Kim]

That case, device-specific coherent memory allocation, is handled at dma_alloc_coherent in arm_dma_alloc.
__dma_alloc handles only general coherent memory allocation.

I'm sorry missing mention about it.


2014-05-20 오후 3:52, Joonsoo Kim 쓴 글:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 02:57:47PM +0900, Gioh Kim wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for your advise, Michal Nazarewicz.
>>
>> Having discuss with Joonsoo, I'm adding fallback allocation after __alloc_from_contiguous().
>> The fallback allocation works if CMA kernel options is turned on but CMA size is zero.
>
> Hello, Gioh.
>
> I also mentioned the case where devices have their specific cma_area.
> It means that this device needs memory with some contraint.
> Although I'm not familiar with DMA infrastructure, I think that
> we should handle this case.
>
> How about below patch?
>
> ------------>8----------------
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 6b00be1..4023434 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>   	unsigned long *bitmap;
>   	struct page *page;
>   	struct page **pages;
> -	void *ptr;
> +	void *ptr = NULL;
>   	int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_pages) * sizeof(long);
>
>   	bitmap = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -393,7 +393,8 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>   	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
>   		ptr = __alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, pool->size, prot, &page,
>   					      atomic_pool_init);
> -	else
> +
> +	if (!ptr)
>   		ptr = __alloc_remap_buffer(NULL, pool->size, gfp, prot, &page,
>   					   atomic_pool_init);
>   	if (ptr) {
> @@ -701,10 +702,22 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
>   		addr = __alloc_simple_buffer(dev, size, gfp, &page);
>   	else if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
>   		addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
> -	else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
> -		addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot, &page, caller);
> -	else
> -		addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot, &page, caller);
> +	else {
> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA)) {
> +			addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot,
> +							&page, caller);
> +			/*
> +			 * Device specific cma_area means that
> +			 * this device needs memory with some contraint.
> +			 * So, we can't fall through general remap allocation.
> +			 */
> +			if (!addr && dev && dev->cma_area)
> +				return NULL;
> +		}
> +
> +		addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot,
> +							&page, caller);
> +	}
>
>   	if (addr)
>   		*handle = pfn_to_dma(dev, page_to_pfn(page));
>

Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Joonsoo Kim]

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 04:05:52PM +0900, Gioh Kim wrote:
> That case, device-specific coherent memory allocation, is handled at dma_alloc_coherent in arm_dma_alloc.
> __dma_alloc handles only general coherent memory allocation.
> 
> I'm sorry missing mention about it.
> 

Hello,

AFAIK, *coherent* memory allocation is different with *contiguous* memory
allocation(CMA). So we need to handle the case I mentioned.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Joonsoo Kim]

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 04:05:52PM +0900, Gioh Kim wrote:
> That case, device-specific coherent memory allocation, is handled at dma_alloc_coherent in arm_dma_alloc.
> __dma_alloc handles only general coherent memory allocation.
> 
> I'm sorry missing mention about it.
> 

Hello,

AFAIK, *coherent* memory allocation is different with *contiguous* memory
allocation(CMA). So we need to handle the case I mentioned.

Thanks.

Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Gioh Kim]

2014-05-20 i??i?? 5:32, Joonsoo Kim i?' e,?:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 04:05:52PM +0900, Gioh Kim wrote:
>> That case, device-specific coherent memory allocation, is handled at dma_alloc_coherent in arm_dma_alloc.
>> __dma_alloc handles only general coherent memory allocation.
>>
>> I'm sorry missing mention about it.
>>
>
> Hello,
>
> AFAIK, *coherent* memory allocation is different with *contiguous* memory
> allocation(CMA). So we need to handle the case I mentioned.

Yes, I confused the coherent memory aand contiguous memory. It's my mistake.

So I checked dma_alloc_from_contiguous and found dev_get_cma_area function.
The dev_get_cma_area returns device-specific cma if it exists or default global-cma.
I think __alloc_from_contiguous doesn't distinguish device-specific cma area and global cma.
The purpose of __alloc_from_contiguous is allocation of contiguous memory from any cma area, not device-specific area.

If my assumption is right, __alloc_from_contiguous can be replaced with __alloc_remap_buffer without checking device-specific cma area.

What do you think about it?

>
> Thanks.
>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Gioh Kim]

2014-05-20 오후 5:32, Joonsoo Kim 쓴 글:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 04:05:52PM +0900, Gioh Kim wrote:
>> That case, device-specific coherent memory allocation, is handled at dma_alloc_coherent in arm_dma_alloc.
>> __dma_alloc handles only general coherent memory allocation.
>>
>> I'm sorry missing mention about it.
>>
>
> Hello,
>
> AFAIK, *coherent* memory allocation is different with *contiguous* memory
> allocation(CMA). So we need to handle the case I mentioned.

Yes, I confused the coherent memory aand contiguous memory. It's my mistake.

So I checked dma_alloc_from_contiguous and found dev_get_cma_area function.
The dev_get_cma_area returns device-specific cma if it exists or default global-cma.
I think __alloc_from_contiguous doesn't distinguish device-specific cma area and global cma.
The purpose of __alloc_from_contiguous is allocation of contiguous memory from any cma area, not device-specific area.

If my assumption is right, __alloc_from_contiguous can be replaced with __alloc_remap_buffer without checking device-specific cma area.

What do you think about it?

>
> Thanks.
>

Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Michal Nazarewicz]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2997 bytes --]

On Mon, May 19 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 02:57:47PM +0900, Gioh Kim wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks for your advise, Michal Nazarewicz.
>> 
>> Having discuss with Joonsoo, I'm adding fallback allocation after __alloc_from_contiguous().
>> The fallback allocation works if CMA kernel options is turned on but CMA size is zero.
>
> Hello, Gioh.
>
> I also mentioned the case where devices have their specific cma_area.
> It means that this device needs memory with some contraint.
> Although I'm not familiar with DMA infrastructure, I think that
> we should handle this case.
>
> How about below patch?
>
> ------------>8----------------
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 6b00be1..4023434 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>  	unsigned long *bitmap;
>  	struct page *page;
>  	struct page **pages;
> -	void *ptr;
> +	void *ptr = NULL;
>  	int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_pages) * sizeof(long);
>  
>  	bitmap = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -393,7 +393,8 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
>  		ptr = __alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, pool->size, prot, &page,
>  					      atomic_pool_init);
> -	else
> +
> +	if (!ptr)
>  		ptr = __alloc_remap_buffer(NULL, pool->size, gfp, prot, &page,
>  					   atomic_pool_init);
>  	if (ptr) {
> @@ -701,10 +702,22 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
>  		addr = __alloc_simple_buffer(dev, size, gfp, &page);
>  	else if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
>  		addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
> -	else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
> -		addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot, &page, caller);
> -	else
> -		addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot, &page, caller);
> +	else {
> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA)) {
> +			addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot,
> +							&page, caller);
> +			/*
> +			 * Device specific cma_area means that
> +			 * this device needs memory with some contraint.
> +			 * So, we can't fall through general remap allocation.
> +			 */
> +			if (!addr && dev && dev->cma_area)
> +				return NULL;
> +		}
> +
> +		addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot,
> +							&page, caller);
> +	}

__arm_dma_free will have to be changed to handle the fallback as well.
But perhaps Marek is right and there should be no fallback for regular
allocations?  Than again, non-CMA allocation should be performed at
least in the case of cma=0.

>  
>  	if (addr)
>  		*handle = pfn_to_dma(dev, page_to_pfn(page));

-- 
Best regards,                                         _     _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science,  Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz    (o o)
ooo +--<mpn@google.com>--<xmpp:mina86@jabber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--

[-- Attachment #2.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]



[-- Attachment #2.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 835 bytes --]

Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Gioh Kim]

2014-05-21 i??i ? 3:22, Michal Nazarewicz i?' e,?:
> On Mon, May 19 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 02:57:47PM +0900, Gioh Kim wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for your advise, Michal Nazarewicz.
>>>
>>> Having discuss with Joonsoo, I'm adding fallback allocation after __alloc_from_contiguous().
>>> The fallback allocation works if CMA kernel options is turned on but CMA size is zero.
>>
>> Hello, Gioh.
>>
>> I also mentioned the case where devices have their specific cma_area.
>> It means that this device needs memory with some contraint.
>> Although I'm not familiar with DMA infrastructure, I think that
>> we should handle this case.
>>
>> How about below patch?
>>
>> ------------>8----------------
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> index 6b00be1..4023434 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>>   	unsigned long *bitmap;
>>   	struct page *page;
>>   	struct page **pages;
>> -	void *ptr;
>> +	void *ptr = NULL;
>>   	int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_pages) * sizeof(long);
>>
>>   	bitmap = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -393,7 +393,8 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>>   	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
>>   		ptr = __alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, pool->size, prot, &page,
>>   					      atomic_pool_init);
>> -	else
>> +
>> +	if (!ptr)
>>   		ptr = __alloc_remap_buffer(NULL, pool->size, gfp, prot, &page,
>>   					   atomic_pool_init);
>>   	if (ptr) {
>> @@ -701,10 +702,22 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
>>   		addr = __alloc_simple_buffer(dev, size, gfp, &page);
>>   	else if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
>>   		addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
>> -	else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
>> -		addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot, &page, caller);
>> -	else
>> -		addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot, &page, caller);
>> +	else {
>> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA)) {
>> +			addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot,
>> +							&page, caller);
>> +			/*
>> +			 * Device specific cma_area means that
>> +			 * this device needs memory with some contraint.
>> +			 * So, we can't fall through general remap allocation.
>> +			 */
>> +			if (!addr && dev && dev->cma_area)
>> +				return NULL;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot,
>> +							&page, caller);
>> +	}
>
> __arm_dma_free will have to be changed to handle the fallback as well.
> But perhaps Marek is right and there should be no fallback for regular
> allocations?  Than again, non-CMA allocation should be performed at
> least in the case of cma=0.


I think in the cases of cma=0, CONFIG_CMA_SIZE_SEL_MBYTES=0 and CONFIG_CMA_SIZE_SEL_PERCENTAGE=0
kernel should be act as like CMA is not turned on.
non-CMA allocation should be performed in the cases.


I will send a patch soon with __arm_dma_free changes.


>
>>
>>   	if (addr)
>>   		*handle = pfn_to_dma(dev, page_to_pfn(page));
>
>
>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Gioh Kim]

2014-05-21 오전 3:22, Michal Nazarewicz 쓴 글:
> On Mon, May 19 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 02:57:47PM +0900, Gioh Kim wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for your advise, Michal Nazarewicz.
>>>
>>> Having discuss with Joonsoo, I'm adding fallback allocation after __alloc_from_contiguous().
>>> The fallback allocation works if CMA kernel options is turned on but CMA size is zero.
>>
>> Hello, Gioh.
>>
>> I also mentioned the case where devices have their specific cma_area.
>> It means that this device needs memory with some contraint.
>> Although I'm not familiar with DMA infrastructure, I think that
>> we should handle this case.
>>
>> How about below patch?
>>
>> ------------>8----------------
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> index 6b00be1..4023434 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>>   	unsigned long *bitmap;
>>   	struct page *page;
>>   	struct page **pages;
>> -	void *ptr;
>> +	void *ptr = NULL;
>>   	int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_pages) * sizeof(long);
>>
>>   	bitmap = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -393,7 +393,8 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>>   	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
>>   		ptr = __alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, pool->size, prot, &page,
>>   					      atomic_pool_init);
>> -	else
>> +
>> +	if (!ptr)
>>   		ptr = __alloc_remap_buffer(NULL, pool->size, gfp, prot, &page,
>>   					   atomic_pool_init);
>>   	if (ptr) {
>> @@ -701,10 +702,22 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
>>   		addr = __alloc_simple_buffer(dev, size, gfp, &page);
>>   	else if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
>>   		addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
>> -	else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
>> -		addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot, &page, caller);
>> -	else
>> -		addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot, &page, caller);
>> +	else {
>> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA)) {
>> +			addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot,
>> +							&page, caller);
>> +			/*
>> +			 * Device specific cma_area means that
>> +			 * this device needs memory with some contraint.
>> +			 * So, we can't fall through general remap allocation.
>> +			 */
>> +			if (!addr && dev && dev->cma_area)
>> +				return NULL;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot,
>> +							&page, caller);
>> +	}
>
> __arm_dma_free will have to be changed to handle the fallback as well.
> But perhaps Marek is right and there should be no fallback for regular
> allocations?  Than again, non-CMA allocation should be performed at
> least in the case of cma=0.


I think in the cases of cma=0, CONFIG_CMA_SIZE_SEL_MBYTES=0 and CONFIG_CMA_SIZE_SEL_PERCENTAGE=0
kernel should be act as like CMA is not turned on.
non-CMA allocation should be performed in the cases.


I will send a patch soon with __arm_dma_free changes.


>
>>
>>   	if (addr)
>>   		*handle = pfn_to_dma(dev, page_to_pfn(page));
>
>
>

Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Gioh Kim]

I change the name of patch into "[PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: add checking cma area initialized",
because I remove fallback allocation and use dev_get_cma_area() to check cma area.
If no cma area exists it goes to __alloc_remap_buffer().

I think this is the same with the fallback allocation but a little simple.

I am sorry but I am not familiar kernel mailing style.
Do I have to send the new patch in new email? Or is it OK to copy the new patch here?

------------------------------ 8< -------------------------------------------
 From e50388f5904105cacea746cd6917c200704f0bf9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 14:16:20 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: add checking cma area initialized

If CMA is turned on and CMA size is set to zero, kernel should
behave as if CMA was not enabled at compile time.
Every dma allocation should check existence of cma area
before requesting memory.

Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
---
  arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c |   12 ++++++++----
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
index 18e98df..61f7b93 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
         unsigned long *bitmap;
         struct page *page;
         struct page **pages;
-       void *ptr;
+       void *ptr = NULL;
         int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_pages) * sizeof(long);

         bitmap = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -390,12 +390,13 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
         if (!pages)
                 goto no_pages;

-       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
+       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) && dma_contiguous_default_area)
                 ptr = __alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, pool->size, prot, &page,
                                               atomic_pool_init);
         else
                 ptr = __alloc_remap_buffer(NULL, pool->size, gfp, prot, &page,
                                            atomic_pool_init);
+
         if (ptr) {
                 int i;

@@ -669,6 +670,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
         u64 mask = get_coherent_dma_mask(dev);
         struct page *page = NULL;
         void *addr;
+       struct cma *cma = dev_get_cma_area(dev);

  #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG
         u64 limit = (mask + 1) & ~mask;
@@ -701,7 +703,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
                 addr = __alloc_simple_buffer(dev, size, gfp, &page);
         else if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
                 addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
-       else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
+       else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) || !cma)
                 addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot, &page, caller);
         else
                 addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot, &page, caller);
@@ -780,6 +782,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
                            bool is_coherent)
  {
         struct page *page = pfn_to_page(dma_to_pfn(dev, handle));
+       struct cma *cma = dev_get_cma_area(dev);

         if (dma_release_from_coherent(dev, get_order(size), cpu_addr))
                 return;
@@ -790,7 +793,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
                 __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
         } else if (__free_from_pool(cpu_addr, size)) {
                 return;
-       } else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA)) {
+       } else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) || !cma) {
                 __dma_free_remap(cpu_addr, size);
                 __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
         } else {
@@ -798,6 +801,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
                  * Non-atomic allocations cannot be freed with IRQs disabled
                  */
                 WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
+
                 __free_from_contiguous(dev, page, cpu_addr, size);
         }
  }
--
1.7.9.5


2014-05-21 i??i ? 3:22, Michal Nazarewicz i?' e,?:
> On Mon, May 19 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 02:57:47PM +0900, Gioh Kim wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for your advise, Michal Nazarewicz.
>>>
>>> Having discuss with Joonsoo, I'm adding fallback allocation after __alloc_from_contiguous().
>>> The fallback allocation works if CMA kernel options is turned on but CMA size is zero.
>>
>> Hello, Gioh.
>>
>> I also mentioned the case where devices have their specific cma_area.
>> It means that this device needs memory with some contraint.
>> Although I'm not familiar with DMA infrastructure, I think that
>> we should handle this case.
>>
>> How about below patch?
>>
>> ------------>8----------------
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> index 6b00be1..4023434 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>>   	unsigned long *bitmap;
>>   	struct page *page;
>>   	struct page **pages;
>> -	void *ptr;
>> +	void *ptr = NULL;
>>   	int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_pages) * sizeof(long);
>>
>>   	bitmap = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -393,7 +393,8 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>>   	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
>>   		ptr = __alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, pool->size, prot, &page,
>>   					      atomic_pool_init);
>> -	else
>> +
>> +	if (!ptr)
>>   		ptr = __alloc_remap_buffer(NULL, pool->size, gfp, prot, &page,
>>   					   atomic_pool_init);
>>   	if (ptr) {
>> @@ -701,10 +702,22 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
>>   		addr = __alloc_simple_buffer(dev, size, gfp, &page);
>>   	else if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
>>   		addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
>> -	else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
>> -		addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot, &page, caller);
>> -	else
>> -		addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot, &page, caller);
>> +	else {
>> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA)) {
>> +			addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot,
>> +							&page, caller);
>> +			/*
>> +			 * Device specific cma_area means that
>> +			 * this device needs memory with some contraint.
>> +			 * So, we can't fall through general remap allocation.
>> +			 */
>> +			if (!addr && dev && dev->cma_area)
>> +				return NULL;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot,
>> +							&page, caller);
>> +	}
>
> __arm_dma_free will have to be changed to handle the fallback as well.
> But perhaps Marek is right and there should be no fallback for regular
> allocations?  Than again, non-CMA allocation should be performed at
> least in the case of cma=0.
>
>>
>>   	if (addr)
>>   		*handle = pfn_to_dma(dev, page_to_pfn(page));
>
>
>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Gioh Kim]

I change the name of patch into "[PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: add checking cma area initialized",
because I remove fallback allocation and use dev_get_cma_area() to check cma area.
If no cma area exists it goes to __alloc_remap_buffer().

I think this is the same with the fallback allocation but a little simple.

I am sorry but I am not familiar kernel mailing style.
Do I have to send the new patch in new email? Or is it OK to copy the new patch here?

------------------------------ 8< -------------------------------------------
 From e50388f5904105cacea746cd6917c200704f0bf9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 14:16:20 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: add checking cma area initialized

If CMA is turned on and CMA size is set to zero, kernel should
behave as if CMA was not enabled at compile time.
Every dma allocation should check existence of cma area
before requesting memory.

Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
---
  arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c |   12 ++++++++----
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
index 18e98df..61f7b93 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
         unsigned long *bitmap;
         struct page *page;
         struct page **pages;
-       void *ptr;
+       void *ptr = NULL;
         int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_pages) * sizeof(long);

         bitmap = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -390,12 +390,13 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
         if (!pages)
                 goto no_pages;

-       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
+       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) && dma_contiguous_default_area)
                 ptr = __alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, pool->size, prot, &page,
                                               atomic_pool_init);
         else
                 ptr = __alloc_remap_buffer(NULL, pool->size, gfp, prot, &page,
                                            atomic_pool_init);
+
         if (ptr) {
                 int i;

@@ -669,6 +670,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
         u64 mask = get_coherent_dma_mask(dev);
         struct page *page = NULL;
         void *addr;
+       struct cma *cma = dev_get_cma_area(dev);

  #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG
         u64 limit = (mask + 1) & ~mask;
@@ -701,7 +703,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
                 addr = __alloc_simple_buffer(dev, size, gfp, &page);
         else if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
                 addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
-       else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
+       else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) || !cma)
                 addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot, &page, caller);
         else
                 addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot, &page, caller);
@@ -780,6 +782,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
                            bool is_coherent)
  {
         struct page *page = pfn_to_page(dma_to_pfn(dev, handle));
+       struct cma *cma = dev_get_cma_area(dev);

         if (dma_release_from_coherent(dev, get_order(size), cpu_addr))
                 return;
@@ -790,7 +793,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
                 __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
         } else if (__free_from_pool(cpu_addr, size)) {
                 return;
-       } else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA)) {
+       } else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) || !cma) {
                 __dma_free_remap(cpu_addr, size);
                 __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
         } else {
@@ -798,6 +801,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
                  * Non-atomic allocations cannot be freed with IRQs disabled
                  */
                 WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
+
                 __free_from_contiguous(dev, page, cpu_addr, size);
         }
  }
--
1.7.9.5


2014-05-21 오전 3:22, Michal Nazarewicz 쓴 글:
> On Mon, May 19 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 02:57:47PM +0900, Gioh Kim wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for your advise, Michal Nazarewicz.
>>>
>>> Having discuss with Joonsoo, I'm adding fallback allocation after __alloc_from_contiguous().
>>> The fallback allocation works if CMA kernel options is turned on but CMA size is zero.
>>
>> Hello, Gioh.
>>
>> I also mentioned the case where devices have their specific cma_area.
>> It means that this device needs memory with some contraint.
>> Although I'm not familiar with DMA infrastructure, I think that
>> we should handle this case.
>>
>> How about below patch?
>>
>> ------------>8----------------
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> index 6b00be1..4023434 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>>   	unsigned long *bitmap;
>>   	struct page *page;
>>   	struct page **pages;
>> -	void *ptr;
>> +	void *ptr = NULL;
>>   	int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_pages) * sizeof(long);
>>
>>   	bitmap = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -393,7 +393,8 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>>   	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
>>   		ptr = __alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, pool->size, prot, &page,
>>   					      atomic_pool_init);
>> -	else
>> +
>> +	if (!ptr)
>>   		ptr = __alloc_remap_buffer(NULL, pool->size, gfp, prot, &page,
>>   					   atomic_pool_init);
>>   	if (ptr) {
>> @@ -701,10 +702,22 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
>>   		addr = __alloc_simple_buffer(dev, size, gfp, &page);
>>   	else if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
>>   		addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
>> -	else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
>> -		addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot, &page, caller);
>> -	else
>> -		addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot, &page, caller);
>> +	else {
>> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA)) {
>> +			addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot,
>> +							&page, caller);
>> +			/*
>> +			 * Device specific cma_area means that
>> +			 * this device needs memory with some contraint.
>> +			 * So, we can't fall through general remap allocation.
>> +			 */
>> +			if (!addr && dev && dev->cma_area)
>> +				return NULL;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot,
>> +							&page, caller);
>> +	}
>
> __arm_dma_free will have to be changed to handle the fallback as well.
> But perhaps Marek is right and there should be no fallback for regular
> allocations?  Than again, non-CMA allocation should be performed at
> least in the case of cma=0.
>
>>
>>   	if (addr)
>>   		*handle = pfn_to_dma(dev, page_to_pfn(page));
>
>
>

Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Michal Nazarewicz]

On Wed, May 21 2014, Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com> wrote:
> Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 14:16:20 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: add checking cma area initialized
>
> If CMA is turned on and CMA size is set to zero, kernel should
> behave as if CMA was not enabled at compile time.
> Every dma allocation should check existence of cma area
> before requesting memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>

Some minor comments.  Also, I'd love for someone more experienced with
ARM to take a look at this as well.

> ---
>   arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c |   12 ++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 18e98df..61f7b93 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>          unsigned long *bitmap;
>          struct page *page;
>          struct page **pages;
> -       void *ptr;
> +       void *ptr = NULL;

This is unnecessary any more.

>          int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_pages) * sizeof(long);
>
>          bitmap = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -390,12 +390,13 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>          if (!pages)
>                  goto no_pages;
>
> -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) && dma_contiguous_default_area)

+	if (dev_get_cma_area(NULL))

dev_get_cma_area returns NULL if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) so there's
no need to check it explicitly.  And with NULL argument,
deg_get_cma_area returns the default area.

>                  ptr = __alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, pool->size, prot, &page,
>                                                atomic_pool_init);
>          else
>                  ptr = __alloc_remap_buffer(NULL, pool->size, gfp, prot, &page,
>                                             atomic_pool_init);
> +
>          if (ptr) {
>                  int i;
>
> @@ -669,6 +670,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
>          u64 mask = get_coherent_dma_mask(dev);
>          struct page *page = NULL;
>          void *addr;
> +       struct cma *cma = dev_get_cma_area(dev);
>
>   #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG
>          u64 limit = (mask + 1) & ~mask;
> @@ -701,7 +703,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
>                  addr = __alloc_simple_buffer(dev, size, gfp, &page);
>          else if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
>                  addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
> -       else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
> +       else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) || !cma)

Like above, just do:

+	else if (!dev_get_cma_area(dev))

This will also allow to drop the “cma” variable above.

>                  addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot, &page, caller);
>          else
>                  addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot, &page, caller);
> @@ -780,6 +782,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
>                             bool is_coherent)
>   {
>          struct page *page = pfn_to_page(dma_to_pfn(dev, handle));
> +       struct cma *cma = dev_get_cma_area(dev);
>
>          if (dma_release_from_coherent(dev, get_order(size), cpu_addr))
>                  return;
> @@ -790,7 +793,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
>                  __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
>          } else if (__free_from_pool(cpu_addr, size)) {
>                  return;
> -       } else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA)) {
> +       } else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) || !cma) {

Ditto.

>                  __dma_free_remap(cpu_addr, size);
>                  __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
>          } else {
> @@ -798,6 +801,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
>                   * Non-atomic allocations cannot be freed with IRQs disabled
>                   */
>                  WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
> +

Unrelated change.

>                  __free_from_contiguous(dev, page, cpu_addr, size);
>          }
>   }
> --
> 1.7.9.5

-- 
Best regards,                                         _     _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science,  Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz    (o o)
ooo +--<mpn@google.com>--<xmpp:mina86@jabber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Michal Nazarewicz]

On Wed, May 21 2014, Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com> wrote:
> Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 14:16:20 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: add checking cma area initialized
>
> If CMA is turned on and CMA size is set to zero, kernel should
> behave as if CMA was not enabled at compile time.
> Every dma allocation should check existence of cma area
> before requesting memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>

Some minor comments.  Also, I'd love for someone more experienced with
ARM to take a look at this as well.

> ---
>   arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c |   12 ++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 18e98df..61f7b93 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>          unsigned long *bitmap;
>          struct page *page;
>          struct page **pages;
> -       void *ptr;
> +       void *ptr = NULL;

This is unnecessary any more.

>          int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_pages) * sizeof(long);
>
>          bitmap = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -390,12 +390,13 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>          if (!pages)
>                  goto no_pages;
>
> -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) && dma_contiguous_default_area)

+	if (dev_get_cma_area(NULL))

dev_get_cma_area returns NULL if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) so there's
no need to check it explicitly.  And with NULL argument,
deg_get_cma_area returns the default area.

>                  ptr = __alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, pool->size, prot, &page,
>                                                atomic_pool_init);
>          else
>                  ptr = __alloc_remap_buffer(NULL, pool->size, gfp, prot, &page,
>                                             atomic_pool_init);
> +
>          if (ptr) {
>                  int i;
>
> @@ -669,6 +670,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
>          u64 mask = get_coherent_dma_mask(dev);
>          struct page *page = NULL;
>          void *addr;
> +       struct cma *cma = dev_get_cma_area(dev);
>
>   #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG
>          u64 limit = (mask + 1) & ~mask;
> @@ -701,7 +703,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
>                  addr = __alloc_simple_buffer(dev, size, gfp, &page);
>          else if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
>                  addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
> -       else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
> +       else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) || !cma)

Like above, just do:

+	else if (!dev_get_cma_area(dev))

This will also allow to drop the “cma” variable above.

>                  addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot, &page, caller);
>          else
>                  addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot, &page, caller);
> @@ -780,6 +782,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
>                             bool is_coherent)
>   {
>          struct page *page = pfn_to_page(dma_to_pfn(dev, handle));
> +       struct cma *cma = dev_get_cma_area(dev);
>
>          if (dma_release_from_coherent(dev, get_order(size), cpu_addr))
>                  return;
> @@ -790,7 +793,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
>                  __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
>          } else if (__free_from_pool(cpu_addr, size)) {
>                  return;
> -       } else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA)) {
> +       } else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) || !cma) {

Ditto.

>                  __dma_free_remap(cpu_addr, size);
>                  __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
>          } else {
> @@ -798,6 +801,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
>                   * Non-atomic allocations cannot be freed with IRQs disabled
>                   */
>                  WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
> +

Unrelated change.

>                  __free_from_contiguous(dev, page, cpu_addr, size);
>          }
>   }
> --
> 1.7.9.5

-- 
Best regards,                                         _     _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science,  Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz    (o o)
ooo +--<mpn@google.com>--<xmpp:mina86@jabber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--

Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Gioh Kim]

I appreciate your comments.
The previous patch was ugly. But now it's beautiful! Just 3 lines!

I'm not familiar with kernel patch process.
Can I have your name at Signed-off-by: line?
What tag do I have to write your name in?


--------------------------------- 8< ----------------------------------------------
 From 135c986cfaa5a7291519308b3d47e58bf9f5af25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 14:16:20 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: add checking cma area initialized

If CMA is turned on and CMA size is set to zero, kernel should
behave as if CMA was not enabled at compile time.
Every dma allocation should check existence of cma area
before requesting memory.

Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
---
  arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c |    7 ++++---
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
index 18e98df..9173a13 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@ -390,12 +390,13 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
         if (!pages)
                 goto no_pages;

-       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
+       if (dev_get_cma_area(NULL))
                 ptr = __alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, pool->size, prot, &page,
                                               atomic_pool_init);
         else
                 ptr = __alloc_remap_buffer(NULL, pool->size, gfp, prot, &page,
                                            atomic_pool_init);
+
         if (ptr) {
                 int i;

@@ -701,7 +702,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
                 addr = __alloc_simple_buffer(dev, size, gfp, &page);
         else if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
                 addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
-       else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
+       else if (!dev_get_cma_area(dev))
                 addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot, &page, caller);
         else
                 addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot, &page, caller);
@@ -790,7 +791,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
                 __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
         } else if (__free_from_pool(cpu_addr, size)) {
                 return;
-       } else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA)) {
+       } else if (!dev_get_cma_area(dev)) {
                 __dma_free_remap(cpu_addr, size);
                 __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
         } else {
--
1.7.9.5


2014-05-22 i??i ? 5:11, Michal Nazarewicz i?' e,?:
> On Wed, May 21 2014, Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com> wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 14:16:20 +0900
>> Subject: [PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: add checking cma area initialized
>>
>> If CMA is turned on and CMA size is set to zero, kernel should
>> behave as if CMA was not enabled at compile time.
>> Every dma allocation should check existence of cma area
>> before requesting memory.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>
> Some minor comments.  Also, I'd love for someone more experienced with
> ARM to take a look at this as well.
>
>> ---
>>    arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c |   12 ++++++++----
>>    1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> index 18e98df..61f7b93 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>>           unsigned long *bitmap;
>>           struct page *page;
>>           struct page **pages;
>> -       void *ptr;
>> +       void *ptr = NULL;
>
> This is unnecessary any more.
>
>>           int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_pages) * sizeof(long);
>>
>>           bitmap = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -390,12 +390,13 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>>           if (!pages)
>>                   goto no_pages;
>>
>> -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
>> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) && dma_contiguous_default_area)
>
> +	if (dev_get_cma_area(NULL))
>
> dev_get_cma_area returns NULL if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) so there's
> no need to check it explicitly.  And with NULL argument,
> deg_get_cma_area returns the default area.
>
>>                   ptr = __alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, pool->size, prot, &page,
>>                                                 atomic_pool_init);
>>           else
>>                   ptr = __alloc_remap_buffer(NULL, pool->size, gfp, prot, &page,
>>                                              atomic_pool_init);
>> +
>>           if (ptr) {
>>                   int i;
>>
>> @@ -669,6 +670,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
>>           u64 mask = get_coherent_dma_mask(dev);
>>           struct page *page = NULL;
>>           void *addr;
>> +       struct cma *cma = dev_get_cma_area(dev);
>>
>>    #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG
>>           u64 limit = (mask + 1) & ~mask;
>> @@ -701,7 +703,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
>>                   addr = __alloc_simple_buffer(dev, size, gfp, &page);
>>           else if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
>>                   addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
>> -       else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
>> +       else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) || !cma)
>
> Like above, just do:
>
> +	else if (!dev_get_cma_area(dev))
>
> This will also allow to drop the a??cmaa?? variable above.
>
>>                   addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot, &page, caller);
>>           else
>>                   addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot, &page, caller);
>> @@ -780,6 +782,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
>>                              bool is_coherent)
>>    {
>>           struct page *page = pfn_to_page(dma_to_pfn(dev, handle));
>> +       struct cma *cma = dev_get_cma_area(dev);
>>
>>           if (dma_release_from_coherent(dev, get_order(size), cpu_addr))
>>                   return;
>> @@ -790,7 +793,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
>>                   __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
>>           } else if (__free_from_pool(cpu_addr, size)) {
>>                   return;
>> -       } else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA)) {
>> +       } else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) || !cma) {
>
> Ditto.
>
>>                   __dma_free_remap(cpu_addr, size);
>>                   __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
>>           } else {
>> @@ -798,6 +801,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
>>                    * Non-atomic allocations cannot be freed with IRQs disabled
>>                    */
>>                   WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
>> +
>
> Unrelated change.
>
>>                   __free_from_contiguous(dev, page, cpu_addr, size);
>>           }
>>    }
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Gioh Kim]

I appreciate your comments.
The previous patch was ugly. But now it's beautiful! Just 3 lines!

I'm not familiar with kernel patch process.
Can I have your name at Signed-off-by: line?
What tag do I have to write your name in?


--------------------------------- 8< ----------------------------------------------
 From 135c986cfaa5a7291519308b3d47e58bf9f5af25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 14:16:20 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: add checking cma area initialized

If CMA is turned on and CMA size is set to zero, kernel should
behave as if CMA was not enabled at compile time.
Every dma allocation should check existence of cma area
before requesting memory.

Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
---
  arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c |    7 ++++---
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
index 18e98df..9173a13 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@ -390,12 +390,13 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
         if (!pages)
                 goto no_pages;

-       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
+       if (dev_get_cma_area(NULL))
                 ptr = __alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, pool->size, prot, &page,
                                               atomic_pool_init);
         else
                 ptr = __alloc_remap_buffer(NULL, pool->size, gfp, prot, &page,
                                            atomic_pool_init);
+
         if (ptr) {
                 int i;

@@ -701,7 +702,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
                 addr = __alloc_simple_buffer(dev, size, gfp, &page);
         else if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
                 addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
-       else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
+       else if (!dev_get_cma_area(dev))
                 addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot, &page, caller);
         else
                 addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot, &page, caller);
@@ -790,7 +791,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
                 __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
         } else if (__free_from_pool(cpu_addr, size)) {
                 return;
-       } else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA)) {
+       } else if (!dev_get_cma_area(dev)) {
                 __dma_free_remap(cpu_addr, size);
                 __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
         } else {
--
1.7.9.5


2014-05-22 오전 5:11, Michal Nazarewicz 쓴 글:
> On Wed, May 21 2014, Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com> wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 14:16:20 +0900
>> Subject: [PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: add checking cma area initialized
>>
>> If CMA is turned on and CMA size is set to zero, kernel should
>> behave as if CMA was not enabled at compile time.
>> Every dma allocation should check existence of cma area
>> before requesting memory.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>
> Some minor comments.  Also, I'd love for someone more experienced with
> ARM to take a look at this as well.
>
>> ---
>>    arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c |   12 ++++++++----
>>    1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> index 18e98df..61f7b93 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>>           unsigned long *bitmap;
>>           struct page *page;
>>           struct page **pages;
>> -       void *ptr;
>> +       void *ptr = NULL;
>
> This is unnecessary any more.
>
>>           int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_pages) * sizeof(long);
>>
>>           bitmap = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -390,12 +390,13 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>>           if (!pages)
>>                   goto no_pages;
>>
>> -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
>> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) && dma_contiguous_default_area)
>
> +	if (dev_get_cma_area(NULL))
>
> dev_get_cma_area returns NULL if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) so there's
> no need to check it explicitly.  And with NULL argument,
> deg_get_cma_area returns the default area.
>
>>                   ptr = __alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, pool->size, prot, &page,
>>                                                 atomic_pool_init);
>>           else
>>                   ptr = __alloc_remap_buffer(NULL, pool->size, gfp, prot, &page,
>>                                              atomic_pool_init);
>> +
>>           if (ptr) {
>>                   int i;
>>
>> @@ -669,6 +670,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
>>           u64 mask = get_coherent_dma_mask(dev);
>>           struct page *page = NULL;
>>           void *addr;
>> +       struct cma *cma = dev_get_cma_area(dev);
>>
>>    #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG
>>           u64 limit = (mask + 1) & ~mask;
>> @@ -701,7 +703,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
>>                   addr = __alloc_simple_buffer(dev, size, gfp, &page);
>>           else if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
>>                   addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
>> -       else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
>> +       else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) || !cma)
>
> Like above, just do:
>
> +	else if (!dev_get_cma_area(dev))
>
> This will also allow to drop the “cma” variable above.
>
>>                   addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot, &page, caller);
>>           else
>>                   addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot, &page, caller);
>> @@ -780,6 +782,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
>>                              bool is_coherent)
>>    {
>>           struct page *page = pfn_to_page(dma_to_pfn(dev, handle));
>> +       struct cma *cma = dev_get_cma_area(dev);
>>
>>           if (dma_release_from_coherent(dev, get_order(size), cpu_addr))
>>                   return;
>> @@ -790,7 +793,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
>>                   __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
>>           } else if (__free_from_pool(cpu_addr, size)) {
>>                   return;
>> -       } else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA)) {
>> +       } else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) || !cma) {
>
> Ditto.
>
>>                   __dma_free_remap(cpu_addr, size);
>>                   __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
>>           } else {
>> @@ -798,6 +801,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
>>                    * Non-atomic allocations cannot be freed with IRQs disabled
>>                    */
>>                   WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
>> +
>
> Unrelated change.
>
>>                   __free_from_contiguous(dev, page, cpu_addr, size);
>>           }
>>    }
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>

Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Michal Nazarewicz]

On Thu, May 22 2014, Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com> wrote:
> I appreciate your comments.
> The previous patch was ugly. But now it's beautiful! Just 3 lines!
>
> I'm not familiar with kernel patch process.
> Can I have your name at Signed-off-by: line?
> What tag do I have to write your name in?

My Signed-off-by line does not apply in this case.
Documentation/SubmittingPatches describes what Signed-off-by means.

I've added Acked-by below.  You may want to resend this patch using
“git-send-email”.

> --------------------------------- 8< ----------------------------------------------
>  From 135c986cfaa5a7291519308b3d47e58bf9f5af25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
> Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 14:16:20 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: add checking cma area initialized
>
> If CMA is turned on and CMA size is set to zero, kernel should
> behave as if CMA was not enabled at compile time.
> Every dma allocation should check existence of cma area
> before requesting memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>

Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>

But like before, if someone with more ARM knowledge could take a look at
it, it would be awesome.

> ---
>   arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c |    7 ++++---
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 18e98df..9173a13 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -390,12 +390,13 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>          if (!pages)
>                  goto no_pages;
>
> -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
> +       if (dev_get_cma_area(NULL))
>                  ptr = __alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, pool->size, prot, &page,
>                                                atomic_pool_init);
>          else
>                  ptr = __alloc_remap_buffer(NULL, pool->size, gfp, prot, &page,
>                                             atomic_pool_init);
> +
>          if (ptr) {
>                  int i;
>
> @@ -701,7 +702,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
>                  addr = __alloc_simple_buffer(dev, size, gfp, &page);
>          else if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
>                  addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
> -       else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
> +       else if (!dev_get_cma_area(dev))
>                  addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot, &page, caller);
>          else
>                  addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot, &page, caller);
> @@ -790,7 +791,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
>                  __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
>          } else if (__free_from_pool(cpu_addr, size)) {
>                  return;
> -       } else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA)) {
> +       } else if (!dev_get_cma_area(dev)) {
>                  __dma_free_remap(cpu_addr, size);
>                  __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
>          } else {
> --
> 1.7.9.5

-- 
Best regards,                                         _     _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science,  Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz    (o o)
ooo +--<mpn@google.com>--<xmpp:mina86@jabber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Michal Nazarewicz]

On Thu, May 22 2014, Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com> wrote:
> I appreciate your comments.
> The previous patch was ugly. But now it's beautiful! Just 3 lines!
>
> I'm not familiar with kernel patch process.
> Can I have your name at Signed-off-by: line?
> What tag do I have to write your name in?

My Signed-off-by line does not apply in this case.
Documentation/SubmittingPatches describes what Signed-off-by means.

I've added Acked-by below.  You may want to resend this patch using
“git-send-email”.

> --------------------------------- 8< ----------------------------------------------
>  From 135c986cfaa5a7291519308b3d47e58bf9f5af25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
> Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 14:16:20 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: add checking cma area initialized
>
> If CMA is turned on and CMA size is set to zero, kernel should
> behave as if CMA was not enabled at compile time.
> Every dma allocation should check existence of cma area
> before requesting memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>

Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>

But like before, if someone with more ARM knowledge could take a look at
it, it would be awesome.

> ---
>   arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c |    7 ++++---
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 18e98df..9173a13 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -390,12 +390,13 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>          if (!pages)
>                  goto no_pages;
>
> -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
> +       if (dev_get_cma_area(NULL))
>                  ptr = __alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, pool->size, prot, &page,
>                                                atomic_pool_init);
>          else
>                  ptr = __alloc_remap_buffer(NULL, pool->size, gfp, prot, &page,
>                                             atomic_pool_init);
> +
>          if (ptr) {
>                  int i;
>
> @@ -701,7 +702,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
>                  addr = __alloc_simple_buffer(dev, size, gfp, &page);
>          else if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
>                  addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
> -       else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
> +       else if (!dev_get_cma_area(dev))
>                  addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot, &page, caller);
>          else
>                  addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot, &page, caller);
> @@ -790,7 +791,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
>                  __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
>          } else if (__free_from_pool(cpu_addr, size)) {
>                  return;
> -       } else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA)) {
> +       } else if (!dev_get_cma_area(dev)) {
>                  __dma_free_remap(cpu_addr, size);
>                  __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
>          } else {
> --
> 1.7.9.5

-- 
Best regards,                                         _     _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science,  Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz    (o o)
ooo +--<mpn@google.com>--<xmpp:mina86@jabber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--

Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Gioh Kim]

I'll resend the patch using git-send-email with your name.
I also hope some ARM-guys took a look at it.


2014-05-22 i??i?? 12:22, Michal Nazarewicz i?' e,?:
> On Thu, May 22 2014, Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com> wrote:
>> I appreciate your comments.
>> The previous patch was ugly. But now it's beautiful! Just 3 lines!
>>
>> I'm not familiar with kernel patch process.
>> Can I have your name at Signed-off-by: line?
>> What tag do I have to write your name in?
>
> My Signed-off-by line does not apply in this case.
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches describes what Signed-off-by means.
>
> I've added Acked-by below.  You may want to resend this patch using
> a??git-send-emaila??.
>
>> --------------------------------- 8< ----------------------------------------------
>>   From 135c986cfaa5a7291519308b3d47e58bf9f5af25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
>> Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 14:16:20 +0900
>> Subject: [PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: add checking cma area initialized
>>
>> If CMA is turned on and CMA size is set to zero, kernel should
>> behave as if CMA was not enabled at compile time.
>> Every dma allocation should check existence of cma area
>> before requesting memory.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>
> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
>
> But like before, if someone with more ARM knowledge could take a look at
> it, it would be awesome.
>
>> ---
>>    arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c |    7 ++++---
>>    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> index 18e98df..9173a13 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> @@ -390,12 +390,13 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>>           if (!pages)
>>                   goto no_pages;
>>
>> -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
>> +       if (dev_get_cma_area(NULL))
>>                   ptr = __alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, pool->size, prot, &page,
>>                                                 atomic_pool_init);
>>           else
>>                   ptr = __alloc_remap_buffer(NULL, pool->size, gfp, prot, &page,
>>                                              atomic_pool_init);
>> +
>>           if (ptr) {
>>                   int i;
>>
>> @@ -701,7 +702,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
>>                   addr = __alloc_simple_buffer(dev, size, gfp, &page);
>>           else if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
>>                   addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
>> -       else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
>> +       else if (!dev_get_cma_area(dev))
>>                   addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot, &page, caller);
>>           else
>>                   addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot, &page, caller);
>> @@ -790,7 +791,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
>>                   __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
>>           } else if (__free_from_pool(cpu_addr, size)) {
>>                   return;
>> -       } else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA)) {
>> +       } else if (!dev_get_cma_area(dev)) {
>>                   __dma_free_remap(cpu_addr, size);
>>                   __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
>>           } else {
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: fallback allocation for cma failure

[Gioh Kim]

I'll resend the patch using git-send-email with your name.
I also hope some ARM-guys took a look at it.


2014-05-22 오후 12:22, Michal Nazarewicz 쓴 글:
> On Thu, May 22 2014, Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com> wrote:
>> I appreciate your comments.
>> The previous patch was ugly. But now it's beautiful! Just 3 lines!
>>
>> I'm not familiar with kernel patch process.
>> Can I have your name at Signed-off-by: line?
>> What tag do I have to write your name in?
>
> My Signed-off-by line does not apply in this case.
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches describes what Signed-off-by means.
>
> I've added Acked-by below.  You may want to resend this patch using
> “git-send-email”.
>
>> --------------------------------- 8< ----------------------------------------------
>>   From 135c986cfaa5a7291519308b3d47e58bf9f5af25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
>> Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 14:16:20 +0900
>> Subject: [PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: add checking cma area initialized
>>
>> If CMA is turned on and CMA size is set to zero, kernel should
>> behave as if CMA was not enabled at compile time.
>> Every dma allocation should check existence of cma area
>> before requesting memory.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>
> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
>
> But like before, if someone with more ARM knowledge could take a look at
> it, it would be awesome.
>
>> ---
>>    arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c |    7 ++++---
>>    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> index 18e98df..9173a13 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> @@ -390,12 +390,13 @@ static int __init atomic_pool_init(void)
>>           if (!pages)
>>                   goto no_pages;
>>
>> -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
>> +       if (dev_get_cma_area(NULL))
>>                   ptr = __alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, pool->size, prot, &page,
>>                                                 atomic_pool_init);
>>           else
>>                   ptr = __alloc_remap_buffer(NULL, pool->size, gfp, prot, &page,
>>                                              atomic_pool_init);
>> +
>>           if (ptr) {
>>                   int i;
>>
>> @@ -701,7 +702,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
>>                   addr = __alloc_simple_buffer(dev, size, gfp, &page);
>>           else if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
>>                   addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
>> -       else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
>> +       else if (!dev_get_cma_area(dev))
>>                   addr = __alloc_remap_buffer(dev, size, gfp, prot, &page, caller);
>>           else
>>                   addr = __alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size, prot, &page, caller);
>> @@ -790,7 +791,7 @@ static void __arm_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
>>                   __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
>>           } else if (__free_from_pool(cpu_addr, size)) {
>>                   return;
>> -       } else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA)) {
>> +       } else if (!dev_get_cma_area(dev)) {
>>                   __dma_free_remap(cpu_addr, size);
>>                   __dma_free_buffer(page, size);
>>           } else {
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>