From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
davem@davemloft.net, conor.dooley@microchip.com,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, christoph.muellner@vrull.eu,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Implement GCM ghash using Zbc and Zbkb extensions
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 11:44:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5381895.Sb9uPGUboI@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230613030216.GC883@sol.localdomain>
Hi Eric,
Am Dienstag, 13. Juni 2023, 05:02:16 CEST schrieb Eric Biggers:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:04:38PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
> >
> > This was originally part of my vector crypto series, but was part
> > of a separate openssl merge request implementing GCM ghash as using
> > non-vector extensions.
> >
> > As that pull-request
> > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20078
> > got merged recently into openssl, we could also check if this could
> > go into the kernel as well and provide a base for further accelerated
> > cryptographic support.
>
> I'm still a bit skeptical of the usefulness of a standalone "ghash"
> implementation, when in practice it will only be used as part of "gcm(aes)".
> Directly implementing "gcm(aes)" (instead of relying on crypto/gcm.c to compose
> "ghash" and "ctr(aes)") also allows some performance optimizations.
>
> I asked about this on v4
> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/ZCSG71bRuTzVutdm@gmail.com/),
> but I didn't receive a response.
>
> Any thoughts on this?
somehow I always seem to overlook this when adapting the series :-(
I guess for me the main gcm was always a stepping stone to get
started and extend later. This is my first rodeo with crypto stuff
in the kernel, so this looks like a manageable chunk and as can be
seen by the discussion we had about licensing brings enough topics
on its own :-) .
Heiko
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
davem@davemloft.net, conor.dooley@microchip.com,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, christoph.muellner@vrull.eu,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Implement GCM ghash using Zbc and Zbkb extensions
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 11:44:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5381895.Sb9uPGUboI@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230613030216.GC883@sol.localdomain>
Hi Eric,
Am Dienstag, 13. Juni 2023, 05:02:16 CEST schrieb Eric Biggers:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:04:38PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
> >
> > This was originally part of my vector crypto series, but was part
> > of a separate openssl merge request implementing GCM ghash as using
> > non-vector extensions.
> >
> > As that pull-request
> > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20078
> > got merged recently into openssl, we could also check if this could
> > go into the kernel as well and provide a base for further accelerated
> > cryptographic support.
>
> I'm still a bit skeptical of the usefulness of a standalone "ghash"
> implementation, when in practice it will only be used as part of "gcm(aes)".
> Directly implementing "gcm(aes)" (instead of relying on crypto/gcm.c to compose
> "ghash" and "ctr(aes)") also allows some performance optimizations.
>
> I asked about this on v4
> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/ZCSG71bRuTzVutdm@gmail.com/),
> but I didn't receive a response.
>
> Any thoughts on this?
somehow I always seem to overlook this when adapting the series :-(
I guess for me the main gcm was always a stepping stone to get
started and extend later. This is my first rodeo with crypto stuff
in the kernel, so this looks like a manageable chunk and as can be
seen by the discussion we had about licensing brings enough topics
on its own :-) .
Heiko
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-10 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-12 21:04 [PATCH v5 0/4] Implement GCM ghash using Zbc and Zbkb extensions Heiko Stuebner
2023-06-12 21:04 ` Heiko Stuebner
2023-06-12 21:04 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] RISC-V: add Zbc extension detection Heiko Stuebner
2023-06-12 21:04 ` Heiko Stuebner
2023-06-12 21:31 ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-12 21:31 ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-20 19:09 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-06-20 19:09 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-06-20 19:12 ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-20 19:12 ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-20 19:37 ` Jeff Law
2023-06-20 19:37 ` Jeff Law
2023-06-20 19:42 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-06-20 19:42 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-06-12 21:04 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] RISC-V: add Zbkb " Heiko Stuebner
2023-06-12 21:04 ` Heiko Stuebner
2023-06-12 21:33 ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-12 21:33 ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-12 21:04 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] RISC-V: hook new crypto subdir into build-system Heiko Stuebner
2023-06-12 21:04 ` Heiko Stuebner
2023-06-13 16:54 ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-13 16:54 ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-12 21:04 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] RISC-V: crypto: add accelerated GCM GHASH implementation Heiko Stuebner
2023-06-12 21:04 ` Heiko Stuebner
2023-06-13 3:10 ` Eric Biggers
2023-06-13 3:10 ` Eric Biggers
2023-06-13 8:00 ` Heiko Stübner
2023-06-13 8:00 ` Heiko Stübner
2023-06-13 19:01 ` Eric Biggers
2023-06-13 19:01 ` Eric Biggers
2023-06-16 10:34 ` Herbert Xu
2023-06-16 10:34 ` Herbert Xu
2023-07-07 17:57 ` Heiko Stübner
2023-07-07 17:57 ` Heiko Stübner
2023-06-13 3:02 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] Implement GCM ghash using Zbc and Zbkb extensions Eric Biggers
2023-06-13 3:02 ` Eric Biggers
2023-07-10 9:44 ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2023-07-10 9:44 ` Heiko Stuebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5381895.Sb9uPGUboI@phil \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=christoph.muellner@vrull.eu \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.