From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v2)
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 15:02:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53858A06.8080507@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140526185344.GA19976@amt.cnet>
On 2014/5/27 2:53, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> Zone specific allocations, such as GFP_DMA32, should not be restricted
> to cpusets allowed node list: the zones which such allocations demand
> might be contained in particular nodes outside the cpuset node list.
>
> The alternative would be to not perform such allocations from
> applications which are cpuset restricted, which is unrealistic.
>
> Fixes KVM's alloc_page(gfp_mask=GFP_DMA32) with cpuset as explained.
>
Could you add the use case that you described in a previous email to
the changelog?
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
>
> v2: fix slowpath as well (David Rientjes)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
> index 3d54c41..b70a336 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
> @@ -2392,6 +2392,10 @@ int __cpuset_node_allowed_softwall(int node, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>
Add a comment accordingly?
* in_interrupt - any node ok (current task context irrelevant)
* GFP_ATOMIC - any node ok
* TIF_MEMDIE - any node ok
* GFP_KERNEL - any node in enclosing hardwalled cpuset ok
* GFP_USER - only nodes in current tasks mems allowed ok.
> if (in_interrupt() || (gfp_mask & __GFP_THISNODE))
> return 1;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> + if (gfp_zone(gfp_mask) < policy_zone)
> + return 1;
> +#endif
> might_sleep_if(!(gfp_mask & __GFP_HARDWALL));
> if (node_isset(node, current->mems_allowed))
> return 1;
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 5dba293..dfea3dc 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2698,6 +2698,7 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie;
> int alloc_flags = ALLOC_WMARK_LOW|ALLOC_CPUSET|ALLOC_FAIR;
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
> + nodemask_t *cpuset_mems_allowed = &cpuset_current_mems_allowed;
>
> gfp_mask &= gfp_allowed_mask;
>
> @@ -2726,9 +2727,14 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> retry_cpuset:
> cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin();
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> + if (gfp_zone(gfp_mask) < policy_zone)
> + cpuset_mems_allowed = NULL;
> +#endif
> +
> /* The preferred zone is used for statistics later */
> first_zones_zonelist(zonelist, high_zoneidx,
> - nodemask ? : &cpuset_current_mems_allowed,
> + nodemask ? : cpuset_mems_allowed,
> &preferred_zone);
> if (!preferred_zone)
> goto out;
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v2)
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 15:02:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53858A06.8080507@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140526185344.GA19976@amt.cnet>
On 2014/5/27 2:53, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> Zone specific allocations, such as GFP_DMA32, should not be restricted
> to cpusets allowed node list: the zones which such allocations demand
> might be contained in particular nodes outside the cpuset node list.
>
> The alternative would be to not perform such allocations from
> applications which are cpuset restricted, which is unrealistic.
>
> Fixes KVM's alloc_page(gfp_mask=GFP_DMA32) with cpuset as explained.
>
Could you add the use case that you described in a previous email to
the changelog?
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
>
> v2: fix slowpath as well (David Rientjes)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
> index 3d54c41..b70a336 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
> @@ -2392,6 +2392,10 @@ int __cpuset_node_allowed_softwall(int node, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>
Add a comment accordingly?
* in_interrupt - any node ok (current task context irrelevant)
* GFP_ATOMIC - any node ok
* TIF_MEMDIE - any node ok
* GFP_KERNEL - any node in enclosing hardwalled cpuset ok
* GFP_USER - only nodes in current tasks mems allowed ok.
> if (in_interrupt() || (gfp_mask & __GFP_THISNODE))
> return 1;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> + if (gfp_zone(gfp_mask) < policy_zone)
> + return 1;
> +#endif
> might_sleep_if(!(gfp_mask & __GFP_HARDWALL));
> if (node_isset(node, current->mems_allowed))
> return 1;
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 5dba293..dfea3dc 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2698,6 +2698,7 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie;
> int alloc_flags = ALLOC_WMARK_LOW|ALLOC_CPUSET|ALLOC_FAIR;
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
> + nodemask_t *cpuset_mems_allowed = &cpuset_current_mems_allowed;
>
> gfp_mask &= gfp_allowed_mask;
>
> @@ -2726,9 +2727,14 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> retry_cpuset:
> cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin();
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> + if (gfp_zone(gfp_mask) < policy_zone)
> + cpuset_mems_allowed = NULL;
> +#endif
> +
> /* The preferred zone is used for statistics later */
> first_zones_zonelist(zonelist, high_zoneidx,
> - nodemask ? : &cpuset_current_mems_allowed,
> + nodemask ? : cpuset_mems_allowed,
> &preferred_zone);
> if (!preferred_zone)
> goto out;
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-28 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-23 19:37 [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-23 19:37 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-23 20:51 ` David Rientjes
2014-05-23 20:51 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1405231334460.13205-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-23 23:33 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-23 23:33 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-23 23:33 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-26 18:53 ` [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v2) Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-26 18:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-28 7:02 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2014-05-28 7:02 ` Li Zefan
2014-05-28 22:43 ` [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v3) Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-28 22:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-28 23:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-28 23:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-29 18:46 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-29 18:46 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-29 18:43 ` [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v4) Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-29 18:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-29 22:40 ` Andrew Morton
2014-05-29 22:40 ` Andrew Morton
2014-05-29 23:01 ` David Rientjes
2014-05-29 23:01 ` David Rientjes
2014-05-29 23:12 ` Andrew Morton
2014-05-29 23:12 ` Andrew Morton
2014-05-30 13:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-30 13:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-30 21:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-30 21:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-29 23:28 ` [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v5) Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-29 23:28 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-29 23:54 ` David Rientjes
2014-05-29 23:54 ` David Rientjes
2014-05-30 13:12 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-30 13:12 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-30 13:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-30 13:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-30 21:18 ` Andi Kleen
2014-05-30 21:18 ` Andi Kleen
2014-05-27 14:21 ` [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations Christoph Lameter
2014-05-27 14:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-27 14:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-27 14:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-27 14:57 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-27 14:57 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-27 15:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-27 15:31 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53858A06.8080507@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.