All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Shreyas B. Prabhu" <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/powernv: include asm/smp.h to handle UP config
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 11:03:39 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <539152B3.5070702@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401981695-3682-1-git-send-email-shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 06/05/2014 08:51 PM, Shreyas B. Prabhu wrote:
> Build throws following errors when CONFIG_SMP=n
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/setup.c: In function ‘pnv_kexec_wait_secondaries_down’:
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/setup.c:179:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘get_hard_smp_processor_id’
>     rc = opal_query_cpu_status(get_hard_smp_processor_id(i),
> 
> The usage of get_hard_smp_processor_id() needs the declaration from
> <asm/smp.h>. The file setup.c includes <linux/sched.h>, which in-turn
> includes <linux/smp.h>. However, <linux/smp.h> includes <asm/smp.h>
> only on SMP configs and hence UP builds fail.
> 
> Fix this by directly including <asm/smp.h> in setup.c unconditionally.

Can you please clean up the description in the commit message ? and also
the first line in the commit message should mention that the patch is
trying to fix a UP specific build failure.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Shreyas B. Prabhu" <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/powernv: include asm/smp.h to handle UP config
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 11:03:39 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <539152B3.5070702@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401981695-3682-1-git-send-email-shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 06/05/2014 08:51 PM, Shreyas B. Prabhu wrote:
> Build throws following errors when CONFIG_SMP=n
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/setup.c: In function ‘pnv_kexec_wait_secondaries_down’:
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/setup.c:179:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘get_hard_smp_processor_id’
>     rc = opal_query_cpu_status(get_hard_smp_processor_id(i),
> 
> The usage of get_hard_smp_processor_id() needs the declaration from
> <asm/smp.h>. The file setup.c includes <linux/sched.h>, which in-turn
> includes <linux/smp.h>. However, <linux/smp.h> includes <asm/smp.h>
> only on SMP configs and hence UP builds fail.
> 
> Fix this by directly including <asm/smp.h> in setup.c unconditionally.

Can you please clean up the description in the commit message ? and also
the first line in the commit message should mention that the patch is
trying to fix a UP specific build failure.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-06-06  5:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-05 15:21 [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/powernv: include asm/smp.h to handle UP config Shreyas B. Prabhu
2014-06-05 15:21 ` Shreyas B. Prabhu
2014-06-05 15:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/powernv : Disable subcore for UP configs Shreyas B. Prabhu
2014-06-05 15:24   ` Shreyas B. Prabhu
2014-06-06  5:52   ` Anshuman Khandual
2014-06-06  5:52     ` Anshuman Khandual
2014-06-06  5:33 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2014-06-06  5:33   ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/powernv: include asm/smp.h to handle UP config Anshuman Khandual
2014-06-06  6:30   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-06-06  6:30     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-06-06 11:03   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-06-06 11:03     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=539152B3.5070702@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.