All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: Xufeng Zhang <xufeng.zhang@windriver.com>
Cc: vyasevich@gmail.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sctp: Fix sk_ack_backlog wrap-around problem
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 08:04:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53995F27.4050308@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402541616-15117-1-git-send-email-xufeng.zhang@windriver.com>

On 06/12/2014 04:53 AM, Xufeng Zhang wrote:
> Consider the scenario:
> For a TCP-style socket, while processing the COOKIE_ECHO chunk in
> sctp_sf_do_5_1D_ce(), after it has passed a series of sanity check,
> a new association would be created in sctp_unpack_cookie(), but afterwards,
> some processing maybe failed, and sctp_association_free() will be called to
> free the previously allocated association, in sctp_association_free(),
> sk_ack_backlog value is decremented for this socket, since the initial
> value for sk_ack_backlog is 0, after the decrement, it will be 65535,
> a wrap-around problem happens, and if we want to establish new associations
> afterward in the same socket, ABORT would be triggered since sctp deem the
> accept queue as full.
> Fix this issue by only decrementing sk_ack_backlog for associations in
> the endpoint's list.
>
> Fix-suggested-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xufeng Zhang <xufeng.zhang@windriver.com>

Looks good to me, thanks. This also needs to go to -stable.

Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: Xufeng Zhang <xufeng.zhang@windriver.com>
Cc: vyasevich@gmail.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sctp: Fix sk_ack_backlog wrap-around problem
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:04:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53995F27.4050308@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402541616-15117-1-git-send-email-xufeng.zhang@windriver.com>

On 06/12/2014 04:53 AM, Xufeng Zhang wrote:
> Consider the scenario:
> For a TCP-style socket, while processing the COOKIE_ECHO chunk in
> sctp_sf_do_5_1D_ce(), after it has passed a series of sanity check,
> a new association would be created in sctp_unpack_cookie(), but afterwards,
> some processing maybe failed, and sctp_association_free() will be called to
> free the previously allocated association, in sctp_association_free(),
> sk_ack_backlog value is decremented for this socket, since the initial
> value for sk_ack_backlog is 0, after the decrement, it will be 65535,
> a wrap-around problem happens, and if we want to establish new associations
> afterward in the same socket, ABORT would be triggered since sctp deem the
> accept queue as full.
> Fix this issue by only decrementing sk_ack_backlog for associations in
> the endpoint's list.
>
> Fix-suggested-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xufeng Zhang <xufeng.zhang@windriver.com>

Looks good to me, thanks. This also needs to go to -stable.

Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-12  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-12  2:53 [PATCH v2] sctp: Fix sk_ack_backlog wrap-around problem Xufeng Zhang
2014-06-12  2:53 ` Xufeng Zhang
2014-06-12  8:04 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2014-06-12  8:04   ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-06-12 14:29 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-06-12 14:29   ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-06-12 17:38 ` David Miller
2014-06-12 17:38   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53995F27.4050308@redhat.com \
    --to=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    --cc=xufeng.zhang@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.