From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Xufeng Zhang <xufeng.zhang@windriver.com>,
nhorman@tuxdriver.com, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sctp: Fix sk_ack_backlog wrap-around problem
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:29:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5399B95A.9080804@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402541616-15117-1-git-send-email-xufeng.zhang@windriver.com>
On 06/11/2014 10:53 PM, Xufeng Zhang wrote:
> Consider the scenario:
> For a TCP-style socket, while processing the COOKIE_ECHO chunk in
> sctp_sf_do_5_1D_ce(), after it has passed a series of sanity check,
> a new association would be created in sctp_unpack_cookie(), but afterwards,
> some processing maybe failed, and sctp_association_free() will be called to
> free the previously allocated association, in sctp_association_free(),
> sk_ack_backlog value is decremented for this socket, since the initial
> value for sk_ack_backlog is 0, after the decrement, it will be 65535,
> a wrap-around problem happens, and if we want to establish new associations
> afterward in the same socket, ABORT would be triggered since sctp deem the
> accept queue as full.
> Fix this issue by only decrementing sk_ack_backlog for associations in
> the endpoint's list.
>
> Fix-suggested-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xufeng Zhang <xufeng.zhang@windriver.com>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
Thanks
-vlad
> ---
> Change for v2:
> Drop the redundant test for temp suggested by Vlad Yasevich.
>
> net/sctp/associola.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/associola.c b/net/sctp/associola.c
> index 39579c3..0b99998 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/associola.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/associola.c
> @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ void sctp_association_free(struct sctp_association *asoc)
> /* Only real associations count against the endpoint, so
> * don't bother for if this is a temporary association.
> */
> - if (!asoc->temp) {
> + if (!list_empty(&asoc->asocs)) {
> list_del(&asoc->asocs);
>
> /* Decrement the backlog value for a TCP-style listening
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Xufeng Zhang <xufeng.zhang@windriver.com>,
nhorman@tuxdriver.com, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sctp: Fix sk_ack_backlog wrap-around problem
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:29:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5399B95A.9080804@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402541616-15117-1-git-send-email-xufeng.zhang@windriver.com>
On 06/11/2014 10:53 PM, Xufeng Zhang wrote:
> Consider the scenario:
> For a TCP-style socket, while processing the COOKIE_ECHO chunk in
> sctp_sf_do_5_1D_ce(), after it has passed a series of sanity check,
> a new association would be created in sctp_unpack_cookie(), but afterwards,
> some processing maybe failed, and sctp_association_free() will be called to
> free the previously allocated association, in sctp_association_free(),
> sk_ack_backlog value is decremented for this socket, since the initial
> value for sk_ack_backlog is 0, after the decrement, it will be 65535,
> a wrap-around problem happens, and if we want to establish new associations
> afterward in the same socket, ABORT would be triggered since sctp deem the
> accept queue as full.
> Fix this issue by only decrementing sk_ack_backlog for associations in
> the endpoint's list.
>
> Fix-suggested-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xufeng Zhang <xufeng.zhang@windriver.com>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
Thanks
-vlad
> ---
> Change for v2:
> Drop the redundant test for temp suggested by Vlad Yasevich.
>
> net/sctp/associola.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/associola.c b/net/sctp/associola.c
> index 39579c3..0b99998 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/associola.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/associola.c
> @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ void sctp_association_free(struct sctp_association *asoc)
> /* Only real associations count against the endpoint, so
> * don't bother for if this is a temporary association.
> */
> - if (!asoc->temp) {
> + if (!list_empty(&asoc->asocs)) {
> list_del(&asoc->asocs);
>
> /* Decrement the backlog value for a TCP-style listening
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-12 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-12 2:53 [PATCH v2] sctp: Fix sk_ack_backlog wrap-around problem Xufeng Zhang
2014-06-12 2:53 ` Xufeng Zhang
2014-06-12 8:04 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-06-12 8:04 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-06-12 14:29 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2014-06-12 14:29 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-06-12 17:38 ` David Miller
2014-06-12 17:38 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5399B95A.9080804@gmail.com \
--to=vyasevich@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=xufeng.zhang@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.