All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: "Antoine Ténart" <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>,
	sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com, tj@kernel.org, kishon@ti.com
Cc: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, zmxu@marvell.com,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com,
	jszhang@marvell.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/7] phy: add a driver for the Berlin SATA PHY
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 23:03:25 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53AB1CFD.4040500@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403530783-17180-2-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>

Hello.

On 06/23/2014 05:39 PM, Antoine Ténart wrote:

> The Berlin SoC has a two SATA ports. Add a PHY driver to handle them.

> The mode selection can let us think this PHY can be configured to fit
> other purposes. But there are reasons to think the SATA mode will be
> the only one usable: the PHY registers are only accessible indirectly
> through two registers in the SATA range, the PHY seems to be integrated
> and no information tells us the contrary. For these reasons, make the
> driver a SATA PHY driver.

    I'm not even sure why you want to make it a separate driver if the 
registers are mapped to SATA controller's range.

> Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>

[...]

> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-berlin-sata.c b/drivers/phy/phy-berlin-sata.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..317f62358165
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-berlin-sata.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,246 @@
[...]
+#define HOST_VSA_ADDR		0x0
+#define HOST_VSA_DATA		0x4
+#define PORT_VSR_ADDR		0x78
+#define PORT_VSR_DATA		0x7c
+#define PORT_SCR_CTL		0x2c

    Could you keep this list sorted?

[...]

+struct phy_berlin_desc {
+	struct phy	*phy;
+	u32		val;

    Hm, aren't these power down bits? Why not call the field accordingly?

[...]

> +static int phy_berlin_sata_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> +{
> +	struct phy_berlin_desc *desc = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> +	struct phy_berlin_priv *priv = to_berlin_sata_phy_priv(desc);
> +	void __iomem *ctrl_reg = priv->base + 0x60 + (desc->index * 0x80);
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	u32 regval;
> +
> +	clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk);
> +
> +	spin_lock(&priv->lock);
> +
> +	/* Power on PHY */
> +	writel(CONTROL_REGISTER, priv->base + HOST_VSA_ADDR);
> +	regval = readl(priv->base + HOST_VSA_DATA);
> +	regval &= ~(desc->val);

    Parens not needed here.

> +	writel(regval, priv->base + HOST_VSA_DATA);
> +
> +	/* Configure MBus */
> +	writel(MBUS_SIZE_CONTROL, priv->base + HOST_VSA_ADDR);
> +	regval = readl(priv->base + HOST_VSA_DATA);
> +	regval |= MBUS_WRITE_REQUEST_SIZE_128 | MBUS_READ_REQUEST_SIZE_128;
> +	writel(regval, priv->base + HOST_VSA_DATA);

    It probably makes sense to factor these address/data register writes into 
a separate function like phy_berlin_sata_reg_setbits().

[...]
> +	/* set the controller speed */
> +	writel(0x31, ctrl_reg + PORT_SCR_CTL);

    Value undocumented? Or is this the SATA SControl register by chance?

[...]

> +static int phy_berlin_sata_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct phy *phy;
> +	struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
> +	struct phy_berlin_priv *priv;
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!priv)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	if (!res)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	priv->base = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, resource_size(res));

    Can't you use devm_ioremap_resource()?

> +	if (!priv->base)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	priv->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->clk))
> +		return PTR_ERR(priv->clk);
> +
> +	dev_set_drvdata(dev, priv);
> +	spin_lock_init(&priv->lock);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < BERLIN_SATA_PHY_NB; i++) {
> +		phy = devm_phy_create(dev, &phy_berlin_sata_ops, NULL);
> +		if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to create PHY %d\n", i);
> +			return PTR_ERR(phy);
> +		}
> +
> +		priv->phys[i].phy = phy;
> +		priv->phys[i].val = phy_berlin_power_down_bits[i];
> +		priv->phys[i].index = i;
> +		phy_set_drvdata(phy, &priv->phys[i]);
> +
> +		/* Make sure the PHY is off */
> +		phy_berlin_sata_power_off(phy);
> +	}
> +
> +	phy_provider =
> +		devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, phy_berlin_sata_phy_xlate);
> +	if (IS_ERR(phy_provider))

    No dev_err() here?

> +		return PTR_ERR(phy_provider);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

WBR, Sergei

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com (Sergei Shtylyov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 1/7] phy: add a driver for the Berlin SATA PHY
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 23:03:25 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53AB1CFD.4040500@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403530783-17180-2-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>

Hello.

On 06/23/2014 05:39 PM, Antoine T?nart wrote:

> The Berlin SoC has a two SATA ports. Add a PHY driver to handle them.

> The mode selection can let us think this PHY can be configured to fit
> other purposes. But there are reasons to think the SATA mode will be
> the only one usable: the PHY registers are only accessible indirectly
> through two registers in the SATA range, the PHY seems to be integrated
> and no information tells us the contrary. For these reasons, make the
> driver a SATA PHY driver.

    I'm not even sure why you want to make it a separate driver if the 
registers are mapped to SATA controller's range.

> Signed-off-by: Antoine T?nart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>

[...]

> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-berlin-sata.c b/drivers/phy/phy-berlin-sata.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..317f62358165
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-berlin-sata.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,246 @@
[...]
+#define HOST_VSA_ADDR		0x0
+#define HOST_VSA_DATA		0x4
+#define PORT_VSR_ADDR		0x78
+#define PORT_VSR_DATA		0x7c
+#define PORT_SCR_CTL		0x2c

    Could you keep this list sorted?

[...]

+struct phy_berlin_desc {
+	struct phy	*phy;
+	u32		val;

    Hm, aren't these power down bits? Why not call the field accordingly?

[...]

> +static int phy_berlin_sata_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> +{
> +	struct phy_berlin_desc *desc = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> +	struct phy_berlin_priv *priv = to_berlin_sata_phy_priv(desc);
> +	void __iomem *ctrl_reg = priv->base + 0x60 + (desc->index * 0x80);
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	u32 regval;
> +
> +	clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk);
> +
> +	spin_lock(&priv->lock);
> +
> +	/* Power on PHY */
> +	writel(CONTROL_REGISTER, priv->base + HOST_VSA_ADDR);
> +	regval = readl(priv->base + HOST_VSA_DATA);
> +	regval &= ~(desc->val);

    Parens not needed here.

> +	writel(regval, priv->base + HOST_VSA_DATA);
> +
> +	/* Configure MBus */
> +	writel(MBUS_SIZE_CONTROL, priv->base + HOST_VSA_ADDR);
> +	regval = readl(priv->base + HOST_VSA_DATA);
> +	regval |= MBUS_WRITE_REQUEST_SIZE_128 | MBUS_READ_REQUEST_SIZE_128;
> +	writel(regval, priv->base + HOST_VSA_DATA);

    It probably makes sense to factor these address/data register writes into 
a separate function like phy_berlin_sata_reg_setbits().

[...]
> +	/* set the controller speed */
> +	writel(0x31, ctrl_reg + PORT_SCR_CTL);

    Value undocumented? Or is this the SATA SControl register by chance?

[...]

> +static int phy_berlin_sata_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct phy *phy;
> +	struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
> +	struct phy_berlin_priv *priv;
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!priv)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	if (!res)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	priv->base = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, resource_size(res));

    Can't you use devm_ioremap_resource()?

> +	if (!priv->base)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	priv->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->clk))
> +		return PTR_ERR(priv->clk);
> +
> +	dev_set_drvdata(dev, priv);
> +	spin_lock_init(&priv->lock);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < BERLIN_SATA_PHY_NB; i++) {
> +		phy = devm_phy_create(dev, &phy_berlin_sata_ops, NULL);
> +		if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to create PHY %d\n", i);
> +			return PTR_ERR(phy);
> +		}
> +
> +		priv->phys[i].phy = phy;
> +		priv->phys[i].val = phy_berlin_power_down_bits[i];
> +		priv->phys[i].index = i;
> +		phy_set_drvdata(phy, &priv->phys[i]);
> +
> +		/* Make sure the PHY is off */
> +		phy_berlin_sata_power_off(phy);
> +	}
> +
> +	phy_provider =
> +		devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, phy_berlin_sata_phy_xlate);
> +	if (IS_ERR(phy_provider))

    No dev_err() here?

> +		return PTR_ERR(phy_provider);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

WBR, Sergei

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-25 19:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-23 13:39 [PATCH v7 0/7] ARM: berlin: add AHCI support Antoine Ténart
2014-06-23 13:39 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-06-23 13:39 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] phy: add a driver for the Berlin SATA PHY Antoine Ténart
2014-06-23 13:39   ` Antoine Ténart
2014-06-23 13:39   ` Antoine Ténart
2014-06-25 19:03   ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2014-06-25 19:03     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-06-30  9:59     ` Antoine Ténart
2014-06-30  9:59       ` Antoine Ténart
2014-06-30 14:40       ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-06-30 14:40         ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-06-30 15:44         ` Antoine Ténart
2014-06-30 15:44           ` Antoine Ténart
2014-06-30 16:55           ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-06-30 16:55             ` Sergei Shtylyov
     [not found] ` <1403530783-17180-1-git-send-email-antoine.tenart-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-23 13:39   ` [PATCH v7 2/7] Documentation: bindings: add " Antoine Ténart
2014-06-23 13:39     ` Antoine Ténart
2014-06-23 13:39     ` Antoine Ténart
2014-06-23 13:39 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] ata: libahci: allow to use multiple PHYs Antoine Ténart
2014-06-23 13:39   ` Antoine Ténart
2014-06-23 13:39   ` Antoine Ténart
2014-06-23 13:39 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] ata: ahci_platform: add a generic AHCI compatible Antoine Ténart
2014-06-23 13:39   ` Antoine Ténart
2014-06-23 13:39 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] Documentation: bindings: document the sub-nodes AHCI bindings Antoine Ténart
2014-06-23 13:39   ` Antoine Ténart
2014-06-23 13:39 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] ARM: berlin: add the AHCI node for the BG2Q Antoine Ténart
2014-06-23 13:39   ` Antoine Ténart
2014-06-23 13:39 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] ARM: berlin: enable the eSATA interface on the BG2Q DMP Antoine Ténart
2014-06-23 13:39   ` Antoine Ténart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53AB1CFD.4040500@cogentembedded.com \
    --to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jszhang@marvell.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=zmxu@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.