All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: riel@redhat.com (Rik van Riel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 02/12] sched: remove a wake_affine condition
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 23:06:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BCB1BE.7060301@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404144343-18720-3-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/30/2014 12:05 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> I have tried to understand the meaning of the condition : 
> (this_load <= load && this_load + target_load(prev_cpu, idx) <=
> tl_per_task) but i failed to find a use case that can take
> advantage of it and i haven't found clear description in the
> previous commits' log. Futhermore, the comment of the condition
> refers to the task_hot function that was used before being replaced
> by the current condition: /* * This domain has SD_WAKE_AFFINE and *
> p is cache cold in this domain, and * there is no bad imbalance. 
> */
> 
> If we look more deeply the below condition this_load +
> target_load(prev_cpu, idx) <= tl_per_task
> 
> When sync is clear, we have : tl_per_task = runnable_load_avg /
> nr_running this_load = max(runnable_load_avg, cpuload[idx]) 
> target_load =  max(runnable_load_avg', cpuload'[idx])
> 
> It implies that runnable_load_avg' == 0 and nr_running <= 1 in
> order to match the condition. This implies that runnable_load_avg
> == 0 too because of the condition: this_load <= load but if this
> _load is null, balanced is already set and the test is redundant.
> 
> If sync is set, it's not as straight forward as above (especially
> if cgroup are involved) but the policy should be similar as we have
> removed a task that's going to sleep in order to get a more
> accurate load and this_load values.
> 
> The current conclusion is that these additional condition don't
> give any benefit so we can remove them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

- -- 
All rights reversed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTvLG+AAoJEM553pKExN6DfhMH/iYJAS/nCq1teCNm39zZg1bF
MIp2iWwnB5VTQvwVLQ3FaGU80oWScUez8zjn26LjPp5SnxyDEwG0YVM3/57EyJme
PgffmP8xsVJwRkKnO4VRR0Go2EMXl9cdf9exe6lFjRyv4/Z15o9NZsDmX8JcLmG+
JPKq4DnMpJ3LiMiVuwwYtYSLk/tCHCPLnie4Z/WznlHk220WciVXFZG7AQI2AHXj
pMkZ5TWQODW7PEec+8dGzDnFcdXPftRYWCKLXG+9NM92YQpIsK8nZdC8rJeXhjBC
9VNb8QNZ6yVd0lvOSxy0drOV9BFXUImF6lsLxA12oHE6TLm6FeiHTG9X4xGOhN0=
=XlY9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com,
	efault@gmx.de, nicolas.pitre@linaro.org,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] sched: remove a wake_affine condition
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 23:06:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BCB1BE.7060301@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404144343-18720-3-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/30/2014 12:05 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> I have tried to understand the meaning of the condition : 
> (this_load <= load && this_load + target_load(prev_cpu, idx) <=
> tl_per_task) but i failed to find a use case that can take
> advantage of it and i haven't found clear description in the
> previous commits' log. Futhermore, the comment of the condition
> refers to the task_hot function that was used before being replaced
> by the current condition: /* * This domain has SD_WAKE_AFFINE and *
> p is cache cold in this domain, and * there is no bad imbalance. 
> */
> 
> If we look more deeply the below condition this_load +
> target_load(prev_cpu, idx) <= tl_per_task
> 
> When sync is clear, we have : tl_per_task = runnable_load_avg /
> nr_running this_load = max(runnable_load_avg, cpuload[idx]) 
> target_load =  max(runnable_load_avg', cpuload'[idx])
> 
> It implies that runnable_load_avg' == 0 and nr_running <= 1 in
> order to match the condition. This implies that runnable_load_avg
> == 0 too because of the condition: this_load <= load but if this
> _load is null, balanced is already set and the test is redundant.
> 
> If sync is set, it's not as straight forward as above (especially
> if cgroup are involved) but the policy should be similar as we have
> removed a task that's going to sleep in order to get a more
> accurate load and this_load values.
> 
> The current conclusion is that these additional condition don't
> give any benefit so we can remove them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

- -- 
All rights reversed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTvLG+AAoJEM553pKExN6DfhMH/iYJAS/nCq1teCNm39zZg1bF
MIp2iWwnB5VTQvwVLQ3FaGU80oWScUez8zjn26LjPp5SnxyDEwG0YVM3/57EyJme
PgffmP8xsVJwRkKnO4VRR0Go2EMXl9cdf9exe6lFjRyv4/Z15o9NZsDmX8JcLmG+
JPKq4DnMpJ3LiMiVuwwYtYSLk/tCHCPLnie4Z/WznlHk220WciVXFZG7AQI2AHXj
pMkZ5TWQODW7PEec+8dGzDnFcdXPftRYWCKLXG+9NM92YQpIsK8nZdC8rJeXhjBC
9VNb8QNZ6yVd0lvOSxy0drOV9BFXUImF6lsLxA12oHE6TLm6FeiHTG9X4xGOhN0=
=XlY9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-09  3:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 132+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-30 16:05 [PATCH v3 00/12] sched: consolidation of cpu_power Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] sched: fix imbalance flag reset Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-08  3:13   ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-07-08  3:13     ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-07-08 10:12     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-08 10:12       ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-09  3:54       ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-07-09  3:54         ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-07-09  8:27         ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-09  8:27           ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-09 10:43         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-09 10:43           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-09 11:41           ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-07-09 11:41             ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-07-09 14:44             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-09 14:44               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-10  9:14           ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-10  9:14             ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-10  9:30             ` [PATCH v4 ] " Vincent Guittot
2014-07-10  9:30               ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-10 10:57               ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-07-10 10:57                 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-07-10 11:04             ` [PATCH v3 01/12] " Preeti U Murthy
2014-07-10 11:04               ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-07-09  3:05   ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-09  3:05     ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-09  3:36     ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-09  3:36       ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-09 10:14   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-09 10:14     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-09 10:30     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-09 10:30       ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] sched: remove a wake_affine condition Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-09  3:06   ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2014-07-09  3:06     ` Rik van Riel
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] sched: fix avg_load computation Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-09  3:10   ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-09  3:10     ` Rik van Riel
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] sched: Allow all archs to set the power_orig Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-09  3:11   ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-09  3:11     ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-09 10:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-09 10:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-10 13:42     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-10 13:42       ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] ARM: topology: use new cpu_power interface Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-09  3:11   ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-09  3:11     ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-09  7:49   ` Amit Kucheria
2014-07-09  7:49     ` Amit Kucheria
2014-07-09 10:09     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-09 10:09       ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] sched: add per rq cpu_power_orig Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-09  3:11   ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-09  3:11     ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-09  7:50   ` Amit Kucheria
2014-07-09  7:50     ` Amit Kucheria
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] sched: test the cpu's capacity in wake affine Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-09  3:12   ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-09  3:12     ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-10 11:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-10 11:06     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-10 13:58     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-10 13:58       ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] sched: move cfs task on a CPU with higher capacity Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-10 11:18   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-10 11:18     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-10 14:03     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-10 14:03       ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-11 14:51       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-11 14:51         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-11 15:17         ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-11 15:17           ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-14 13:51           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-14 13:51             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-15  9:21             ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-15  9:21               ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-10 11:24   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-10 11:24     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-10 13:59     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-10 13:59       ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-10 11:31   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-10 11:31     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] Revert "sched: Put rq's sched_avg under CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED" Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-10 13:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-10 13:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-11  7:51     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-11  7:51       ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-11 15:13       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-11 15:13         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-11 17:39         ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-11 17:39           ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-11 20:12           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-11 20:12             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-14 12:55             ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-14 12:55               ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-14 13:20               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-14 13:20                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-14 14:04                 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-14 14:04                   ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-14 16:22                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-14 16:22                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-15  9:20             ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-15  9:20               ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-14 17:54           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-07-14 17:54             ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-07-18  1:27             ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-18  1:27               ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-11 16:13       ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-11 16:13         ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-15  9:27         ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-15  9:27           ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-15  9:32           ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-15  9:32             ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-15  9:53             ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-15  9:53               ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] sched: get CPU's utilization statistic Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] sched: replace capacity_factor by utilization Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] sched: add SD_PREFER_SIBLING for SMT level Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05   ` Vincent Guittot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53BCB1BE.7060301@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.