All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	<pawel.moll@arm.com>, <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	<Will.Deacon@arm.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	<Harish.Kasiviswanathan@amd.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 V3] irqchip: gic: Introduce ARM GICv2m MSI(-X) support
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:59:57 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C3FE7D.3090805@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140713231431.GM13108@titan.lakedaemon.net>

On 7/13/2014 6:14 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> Suravee,
>
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 06:05:00PM -0500, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com wrote:
>> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
>>
>> This patch set introduces support for MSI(-X) in GICv2m specification,
>> which is implemented in some variation of GIC400.
>>
>> This depends on and has been tested with the V7 of"Add support for PCI in AArch64"
>> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/14/320).
>
> Grrr.  I mis-spoke against your v1 of this series.  There are more
> changes to irq-gic.c than I originally thought in this series.

I am not quite sure what your are referring to.

> Additionally, we have a lot of other significant changes to that driver
> as well this cycle.  It would be really helpful if I could take patches
> 1-3 through irqchip/gic.  I can Ack #4 with the Subject change, and the
> branch it lands in can depend on irqchip/gic, no problem there.

Patch 1-3 should be able to go through the irqchip/gic along with the 
gicv3 from Marc, which I have rebased this patch against.

Patch 4 is arch64 architectural changes.  Therefore, it might need to be 
going through a different branch. Marc/Mark/Will/Catalin, do you have 
any suggestions on which branch this should go to?

> My main concern is your statement above and your answer to my inquiry
> against v1.
>
> Right now, I'm only concerned about breaking the build.  Can I take 1-3?
> Or, do we need to wait until aarch64 PCI lands in mainline?

1 and 2 should be trivial since there is no change functionally.

3 mostly adding new files which should not get built if ARCH64 PCI is 
not supported based on the arch/arm64/Kconfig below.

+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ config ARM64
  	select ARM_AMBA
  	select ARM_ARCH_TIMER
  	select ARM_GIC
+	select ARM_GIC_V2M if (PCI && PCI_MSI)
  	select ARM_GIC_V3
  	select BUILDTIME_EXTABLE_SORT
  	select CLONE_BACKWARDS

The only thing is the change related to MSI in the irq-gic.c which 
should not affect with the non-PCI system.

Thanks,

Suravee


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com (Suravee Suthikulanit)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4 V3] irqchip: gic: Introduce ARM GICv2m MSI(-X) support
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:59:57 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C3FE7D.3090805@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140713231431.GM13108@titan.lakedaemon.net>

On 7/13/2014 6:14 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> Suravee,
>
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 06:05:00PM -0500, suravee.suthikulpanit at amd.com wrote:
>> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
>>
>> This patch set introduces support for MSI(-X) in GICv2m specification,
>> which is implemented in some variation of GIC400.
>>
>> This depends on and has been tested with the V7 of"Add support for PCI in AArch64"
>> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/14/320).
>
> Grrr.  I mis-spoke against your v1 of this series.  There are more
> changes to irq-gic.c than I originally thought in this series.

I am not quite sure what your are referring to.

> Additionally, we have a lot of other significant changes to that driver
> as well this cycle.  It would be really helpful if I could take patches
> 1-3 through irqchip/gic.  I can Ack #4 with the Subject change, and the
> branch it lands in can depend on irqchip/gic, no problem there.

Patch 1-3 should be able to go through the irqchip/gic along with the 
gicv3 from Marc, which I have rebased this patch against.

Patch 4 is arch64 architectural changes.  Therefore, it might need to be 
going through a different branch. Marc/Mark/Will/Catalin, do you have 
any suggestions on which branch this should go to?

> My main concern is your statement above and your answer to my inquiry
> against v1.
>
> Right now, I'm only concerned about breaking the build.  Can I take 1-3?
> Or, do we need to wait until aarch64 PCI lands in mainline?

1 and 2 should be trivial since there is no change functionally.

3 mostly adding new files which should not get built if ARCH64 PCI is 
not supported based on the arch/arm64/Kconfig below.

+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ config ARM64
  	select ARM_AMBA
  	select ARM_ARCH_TIMER
  	select ARM_GIC
+	select ARM_GIC_V2M if (PCI && PCI_MSI)
  	select ARM_GIC_V3
  	select BUILDTIME_EXTABLE_SORT
  	select CLONE_BACKWARDS

The only thing is the change related to MSI in the irq-gic.c which 
should not affect with the non-PCI system.

Thanks,

Suravee

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: marc.zyngier@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, pawel.moll@arm.com,
	Catalin.Marinas@arm.com, Will.Deacon@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	Harish.Kasiviswanathan@amd.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 V3] irqchip: gic: Introduce ARM GICv2m MSI(-X) support
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:59:57 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C3FE7D.3090805@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140713231431.GM13108@titan.lakedaemon.net>

On 7/13/2014 6:14 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> Suravee,
>
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 06:05:00PM -0500, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com wrote:
>> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
>>
>> This patch set introduces support for MSI(-X) in GICv2m specification,
>> which is implemented in some variation of GIC400.
>>
>> This depends on and has been tested with the V7 of"Add support for PCI in AArch64"
>> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/14/320).
>
> Grrr.  I mis-spoke against your v1 of this series.  There are more
> changes to irq-gic.c than I originally thought in this series.

I am not quite sure what your are referring to.

> Additionally, we have a lot of other significant changes to that driver
> as well this cycle.  It would be really helpful if I could take patches
> 1-3 through irqchip/gic.  I can Ack #4 with the Subject change, and the
> branch it lands in can depend on irqchip/gic, no problem there.

Patch 1-3 should be able to go through the irqchip/gic along with the 
gicv3 from Marc, which I have rebased this patch against.

Patch 4 is arch64 architectural changes.  Therefore, it might need to be 
going through a different branch. Marc/Mark/Will/Catalin, do you have 
any suggestions on which branch this should go to?

> My main concern is your statement above and your answer to my inquiry
> against v1.
>
> Right now, I'm only concerned about breaking the build.  Can I take 1-3?
> Or, do we need to wait until aarch64 PCI lands in mainline?

1 and 2 should be trivial since there is no change functionally.

3 mostly adding new files which should not get built if ARCH64 PCI is 
not supported based on the arch/arm64/Kconfig below.

+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ config ARM64
  	select ARM_AMBA
  	select ARM_ARCH_TIMER
  	select ARM_GIC
+	select ARM_GIC_V2M if (PCI && PCI_MSI)
  	select ARM_GIC_V3
  	select BUILDTIME_EXTABLE_SORT
  	select CLONE_BACKWARDS

The only thing is the change related to MSI in the irq-gic.c which 
should not affect with the non-PCI system.

Thanks,

Suravee

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-14 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-09 23:05 [PATCH 0/4 V3] irqchip: gic: Introduce ARM GICv2m MSI(-X) support suravee.suthikulpanit
2014-07-09 23:05 ` suravee.suthikulpanit
2014-07-09 23:05 ` suravee.suthikulpanit at amd.com
2014-07-09 23:05 ` [PATCH 1/4 V3] irqchip: gic: Add binding probe for ARM GIC400 suravee.suthikulpanit
2014-07-09 23:05   ` suravee.suthikulpanit
2014-07-09 23:05   ` suravee.suthikulpanit at amd.com
2014-07-14 14:03   ` Heiko Stübner
2014-07-14 14:03     ` Heiko Stübner
2014-07-14 22:03     ` [PATCH] " Heiko Stübner
2014-07-14 22:03       ` Heiko Stübner
2014-07-15  8:01       ` Will Deacon
2014-07-15  8:01         ` Will Deacon
2014-07-17 12:48       ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-17 12:48         ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-17 14:13         ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-07-17 14:13           ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-07-17 14:13           ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-07-17 13:31       ` Mark Rutland
2014-07-17 13:31         ` Mark Rutland
2014-07-09 23:05 ` [PATCH 2/4 V3] irqchip: gic: Restructuring ARM GIC code suravee.suthikulpanit
2014-07-09 23:05   ` suravee.suthikulpanit
2014-07-09 23:05   ` suravee.suthikulpanit at amd.com
2014-07-17 13:12   ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-17 13:12     ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-09 23:05 ` [PATCH 3/4 V3] irqchip: gic: Add supports for ARM GICv2m MSI(-X) suravee.suthikulpanit
2014-07-09 23:05   ` suravee.suthikulpanit
2014-07-09 23:05   ` suravee.suthikulpanit at amd.com
2014-07-13 23:01   ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-13 23:01     ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-17 13:13   ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-17 13:13     ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-17 13:17   ` Mark Rutland
2014-07-17 13:17     ` Mark Rutland
2014-07-30 14:57   ` Marc Zyngier
2014-07-30 14:57     ` Marc Zyngier
2014-07-30 14:57     ` Marc Zyngier
2014-08-01 15:42     ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-08-01 15:42       ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-08-01 15:42       ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-08-01 16:05       ` Marc Zyngier
2014-08-01 16:05         ` Marc Zyngier
2014-08-01 16:05         ` Marc Zyngier
2014-08-01 16:29       ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-08-01 16:29         ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-08-01 17:05         ` Marc Zyngier
2014-08-01 17:05           ` Marc Zyngier
2014-08-01 17:05           ` Marc Zyngier
2014-08-18  0:41   ` Rob Herring
2014-08-18  0:41     ` Rob Herring
2014-07-09 23:05 ` [PATCH 4/4 V3] irqchip: gicv2m: Add support for multiple MSI for ARM64 GICv2m suravee.suthikulpanit
2014-07-09 23:05   ` suravee.suthikulpanit
2014-07-09 23:05   ` suravee.suthikulpanit at amd.com
2014-07-13 23:03   ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-13 23:03     ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-17 12:53   ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-17 12:53     ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-30 15:16   ` Marc Zyngier
2014-07-30 15:16     ` Marc Zyngier
2014-07-30 15:16     ` Marc Zyngier
2014-08-01 14:36     ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-08-01 14:36       ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-08-01 14:51       ` Marc Zyngier
2014-08-01 14:51         ` Marc Zyngier
2014-08-01 16:19         ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-08-01 16:19           ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-07-13 23:14 ` [PATCH 0/4 V3] irqchip: gic: Introduce ARM GICv2m MSI(-X) support Jason Cooper
2014-07-13 23:14   ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-14 15:59   ` Suravee Suthikulanit [this message]
2014-07-14 15:59     ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-07-14 15:59     ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-07-17 12:51     ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-17 12:51       ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-17 13:18 ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-17 13:18   ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-17 13:55   ` Mark Rutland
2014-07-17 13:55     ` Mark Rutland
2014-07-17 14:12     ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-17 14:12       ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-18  9:02       ` Mark Rutland
2014-07-18  9:02         ` Mark Rutland
2014-07-18 12:31         ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-18 12:31           ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-18 12:40           ` Mark Rutland
2014-07-18 12:40             ` Mark Rutland
2014-07-17 14:48     ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-07-17 14:48       ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-07-17 14:48       ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-07-18  9:04       ` Mark Rutland
2014-07-18  9:04         ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53C3FE7D.3090805@amd.com \
    --to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Harish.Kasiviswanathan@amd.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.