From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: 'Olof Johansson' <olof@lixom.net>,
arm@kernel.org, 'Arnd Bergmann' <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
'Doug Anderson' <dianders@chromium.org>,
tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 4/5] Samsung exynos_mct update for v3.17
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:03:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53CF6C4B.8010608@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53CEF4BC.1050105@samsung.com>
On 07/23/2014 01:33 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 07/23/14 02:32, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 07/22/2014 12:59 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>> Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 07/20/2014 12:06 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 09:52:52AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>>>>> Note that this is also based on 3.16-rc5 because of dependency with
>>>>>> previous samsung fixes including exynos_mct already merged in
>>>>>> mainline during -rc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The following changes since commit
>>>>>> 1795cd9b3a91d4b5473c97f491d63892442212ab:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Linux 3.16-rc5 (2014-07-13 14:04:33 -0700)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
>>>>>> tags/exynos-mct
>>>>>>
>>>>>> for you to fetch changes up to
>>>>>> 1a631118c1d085fe162f3b6d44f710c72206ef2d:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> clocksource: exynos_mct: Only use 32-bits where possible
>>>>>> (2014-07-19 03:07:52 +0900)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> exynos_mct update for v3.17
>>>>>> - only use 32-bit access for performance benefits on exynos
>>>>>> 32-bit system and this means ARCH timer should be supported
>>>>>> on exynos 64-bit system instead of current MCT.
>>>>>> - use readl_relaxed/writel_relaxed to consistently use the
>>>>>> proper functions in exynos_mct.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's no reason for these to go through arm-soc, is there? They
>>>>> should
>>>>> go through the clocksource tree (Daniel Lezcano / Thomas Gleixner).
>>>>> They
>>>>> also lack acks from them if they for some reason need to go through
>>>>> arm-soc.
>>>>
>>> Olof, you're right. The branch has no dependency with arm-soc so I
>>> agreed.
>>>
>>>> Yes, that's right. Furthermore I have been discussing with Doug about
>>>> these patches before.
>>>>
>>>> Kukjin, is there any dependency on these patches ?
>>>>
>>> Yeah, Daniel, it should be handled in the clocksource tree so how
>>> should I do
>>> for it?
>>
>> I can pull your branch v3.17-next/mct-exynos and you drop the merge from
>> this branch in your master ?
>>
> Yes please and I did drop the merge in my -next just now.
Ok, thanks.
The patches are applied in my branch for 3.17.
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL 4/5] Samsung exynos_mct update for v3.17
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:03:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53CF6C4B.8010608@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53CEF4BC.1050105@samsung.com>
On 07/23/2014 01:33 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 07/23/14 02:32, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 07/22/2014 12:59 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>> Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 07/20/2014 12:06 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 09:52:52AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>>>>> Note that this is also based on 3.16-rc5 because of dependency with
>>>>>> previous samsung fixes including exynos_mct already merged in
>>>>>> mainline during -rc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The following changes since commit
>>>>>> 1795cd9b3a91d4b5473c97f491d63892442212ab:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Linux 3.16-rc5 (2014-07-13 14:04:33 -0700)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
>>>>>> tags/exynos-mct
>>>>>>
>>>>>> for you to fetch changes up to
>>>>>> 1a631118c1d085fe162f3b6d44f710c72206ef2d:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> clocksource: exynos_mct: Only use 32-bits where possible
>>>>>> (2014-07-19 03:07:52 +0900)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> exynos_mct update for v3.17
>>>>>> - only use 32-bit access for performance benefits on exynos
>>>>>> 32-bit system and this means ARCH timer should be supported
>>>>>> on exynos 64-bit system instead of current MCT.
>>>>>> - use readl_relaxed/writel_relaxed to consistently use the
>>>>>> proper functions in exynos_mct.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's no reason for these to go through arm-soc, is there? They
>>>>> should
>>>>> go through the clocksource tree (Daniel Lezcano / Thomas Gleixner).
>>>>> They
>>>>> also lack acks from them if they for some reason need to go through
>>>>> arm-soc.
>>>>
>>> Olof, you're right. The branch has no dependency with arm-soc so I
>>> agreed.
>>>
>>>> Yes, that's right. Furthermore I have been discussing with Doug about
>>>> these patches before.
>>>>
>>>> Kukjin, is there any dependency on these patches ?
>>>>
>>> Yeah, Daniel, it should be handled in the clocksource tree so how
>>> should I do
>>> for it?
>>
>> I can pull your branch v3.17-next/mct-exynos and you drop the merge from
>> this branch in your master ?
>>
> Yes please and I did drop the merge in my -next just now.
Ok, thanks.
The patches are applied in my branch for 3.17.
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-23 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-19 0:52 [GIT PULL 4/5] Samsung exynos_mct update for v3.17 Kukjin Kim
2014-07-19 0:52 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-19 22:06 ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-19 22:06 ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-21 8:47 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-07-21 8:47 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-07-22 10:59 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-22 10:59 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-22 17:32 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-07-22 17:32 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-07-22 23:33 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-22 23:33 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-23 8:03 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2014-07-23 8:03 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53CF6C4B.8010608@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.