From: lauraa@codeaurora.org (Laura Abbott)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv4 3/5] common: dma-mapping: Introduce common remapping functions
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 14:56:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D02F7B.5020309@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140723104554.GB1366@localhost>
On 7/23/2014 3:45 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:35:06AM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> @@ -298,37 +298,19 @@ static void *
>> __dma_alloc_remap(struct page *page, size_t size, gfp_t gfp, pgprot_t prot,
>> const void *caller)
>> {
>> - struct vm_struct *area;
>> - unsigned long addr;
>> -
>> /*
>> * DMA allocation can be mapped to user space, so lets
>> * set VM_USERMAP flags too.
>> */
>> - area = get_vm_area_caller(size, VM_ARM_DMA_CONSISTENT | VM_USERMAP,
>> - caller);
>> - if (!area)
>> - return NULL;
>> - addr = (unsigned long)area->addr;
>> - area->phys_addr = __pfn_to_phys(page_to_pfn(page));
>> -
>> - if (ioremap_page_range(addr, addr + size, area->phys_addr, prot)) {
>> - vunmap((void *)addr);
>> - return NULL;
>> - }
>> - return (void *)addr;
>> + return dma_common_contiguous_remap(page, size,
>> + VM_ARM_DMA_CONSISTENT | VM_USERMAP,
>> + prot, caller);
>
> I think we still need at least a comment in the commit log since the arm
> code is moving from ioremap_page_range() to map_vm_area(). There is a
> slight performance penalty with the addition of a kmalloc() on this
> path.
>
> Or even better (IMO), see below.
>
>> --- a/drivers/base/dma-mapping.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/dma-mapping.c
> [...]
>> +void *dma_common_contiguous_remap(struct page *page, size_t size,
>> + unsigned long vm_flags,
>> + pgprot_t prot, const void *caller)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> + struct page **pages;
>> + void *ptr;
>> +
>> + pages = kmalloc(sizeof(struct page *) << get_order(size), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!pages)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < (size >> PAGE_SHIFT); i++)
>> + pages[i] = page + i;
>> +
>> + ptr = dma_common_pages_remap(pages, size, vm_flags, prot, caller);
>> +
>> + kfree(pages);
>> +
>> + return ptr;
>> +}
>
> You could avoid the dma_common_page_remap() here (and kmalloc) and
> simply use ioremap_page_range(). We know that
> dma_common_contiguous_remap() is only called with contiguous physical
> range, so ioremap_page_range() is suitable. It also makes it a
> non-functional change for arch/arm.
>
My original thought with using map_vm_area vs. ioremap_page_range was
that ioremap_page_range is really intended for mapping io devices and
the like into the kernel virtual address space. map_vm_area is designed
to handle pages of kernel managed memory. Perhaps it's too nit-picky
a distinction though.
Thanks,
Laura
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
David Riley <davidriley@chromium.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Ritesh Harjain <ritesh.harjani@gmail.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 3/5] common: dma-mapping: Introduce common remapping functions
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 14:56:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D02F7B.5020309@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140723104554.GB1366@localhost>
On 7/23/2014 3:45 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:35:06AM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> @@ -298,37 +298,19 @@ static void *
>> __dma_alloc_remap(struct page *page, size_t size, gfp_t gfp, pgprot_t prot,
>> const void *caller)
>> {
>> - struct vm_struct *area;
>> - unsigned long addr;
>> -
>> /*
>> * DMA allocation can be mapped to user space, so lets
>> * set VM_USERMAP flags too.
>> */
>> - area = get_vm_area_caller(size, VM_ARM_DMA_CONSISTENT | VM_USERMAP,
>> - caller);
>> - if (!area)
>> - return NULL;
>> - addr = (unsigned long)area->addr;
>> - area->phys_addr = __pfn_to_phys(page_to_pfn(page));
>> -
>> - if (ioremap_page_range(addr, addr + size, area->phys_addr, prot)) {
>> - vunmap((void *)addr);
>> - return NULL;
>> - }
>> - return (void *)addr;
>> + return dma_common_contiguous_remap(page, size,
>> + VM_ARM_DMA_CONSISTENT | VM_USERMAP,
>> + prot, caller);
>
> I think we still need at least a comment in the commit log since the arm
> code is moving from ioremap_page_range() to map_vm_area(). There is a
> slight performance penalty with the addition of a kmalloc() on this
> path.
>
> Or even better (IMO), see below.
>
>> --- a/drivers/base/dma-mapping.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/dma-mapping.c
> [...]
>> +void *dma_common_contiguous_remap(struct page *page, size_t size,
>> + unsigned long vm_flags,
>> + pgprot_t prot, const void *caller)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> + struct page **pages;
>> + void *ptr;
>> +
>> + pages = kmalloc(sizeof(struct page *) << get_order(size), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!pages)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < (size >> PAGE_SHIFT); i++)
>> + pages[i] = page + i;
>> +
>> + ptr = dma_common_pages_remap(pages, size, vm_flags, prot, caller);
>> +
>> + kfree(pages);
>> +
>> + return ptr;
>> +}
>
> You could avoid the dma_common_page_remap() here (and kmalloc) and
> simply use ioremap_page_range(). We know that
> dma_common_contiguous_remap() is only called with contiguous physical
> range, so ioremap_page_range() is suitable. It also makes it a
> non-functional change for arch/arm.
>
My original thought with using map_vm_area vs. ioremap_page_range was
that ioremap_page_range is really intended for mapping io devices and
the like into the kernel virtual address space. map_vm_area is designed
to handle pages of kernel managed memory. Perhaps it's too nit-picky
a distinction though.
Thanks,
Laura
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
David Riley <davidriley@chromium.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Ritesh Harjain <ritesh.harjani@gmail.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 3/5] common: dma-mapping: Introduce common remapping functions
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 14:56:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D02F7B.5020309@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140723104554.GB1366@localhost>
On 7/23/2014 3:45 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:35:06AM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> @@ -298,37 +298,19 @@ static void *
>> __dma_alloc_remap(struct page *page, size_t size, gfp_t gfp, pgprot_t prot,
>> const void *caller)
>> {
>> - struct vm_struct *area;
>> - unsigned long addr;
>> -
>> /*
>> * DMA allocation can be mapped to user space, so lets
>> * set VM_USERMAP flags too.
>> */
>> - area = get_vm_area_caller(size, VM_ARM_DMA_CONSISTENT | VM_USERMAP,
>> - caller);
>> - if (!area)
>> - return NULL;
>> - addr = (unsigned long)area->addr;
>> - area->phys_addr = __pfn_to_phys(page_to_pfn(page));
>> -
>> - if (ioremap_page_range(addr, addr + size, area->phys_addr, prot)) {
>> - vunmap((void *)addr);
>> - return NULL;
>> - }
>> - return (void *)addr;
>> + return dma_common_contiguous_remap(page, size,
>> + VM_ARM_DMA_CONSISTENT | VM_USERMAP,
>> + prot, caller);
>
> I think we still need at least a comment in the commit log since the arm
> code is moving from ioremap_page_range() to map_vm_area(). There is a
> slight performance penalty with the addition of a kmalloc() on this
> path.
>
> Or even better (IMO), see below.
>
>> --- a/drivers/base/dma-mapping.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/dma-mapping.c
> [...]
>> +void *dma_common_contiguous_remap(struct page *page, size_t size,
>> + unsigned long vm_flags,
>> + pgprot_t prot, const void *caller)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> + struct page **pages;
>> + void *ptr;
>> +
>> + pages = kmalloc(sizeof(struct page *) << get_order(size), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!pages)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < (size >> PAGE_SHIFT); i++)
>> + pages[i] = page + i;
>> +
>> + ptr = dma_common_pages_remap(pages, size, vm_flags, prot, caller);
>> +
>> + kfree(pages);
>> +
>> + return ptr;
>> +}
>
> You could avoid the dma_common_page_remap() here (and kmalloc) and
> simply use ioremap_page_range(). We know that
> dma_common_contiguous_remap() is only called with contiguous physical
> range, so ioremap_page_range() is suitable. It also makes it a
> non-functional change for arch/arm.
>
My original thought with using map_vm_area vs. ioremap_page_range was
that ioremap_page_range is really intended for mapping io devices and
the like into the kernel virtual address space. map_vm_area is designed
to handle pages of kernel managed memory. Perhaps it's too nit-picky
a distinction though.
Thanks,
Laura
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-23 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-23 1:35 [PATCHv4 0/5] Atomic pool for arm64 Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 1:35 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 1:35 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 1:35 ` [PATCHv4 1/5] lib/genalloc.c: Add power aligned algorithm Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 1:35 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 1:35 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 1:35 ` [PATCHv4 2/5] lib/genalloc.c: Add genpool range check function Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 1:35 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 1:35 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 1:35 ` [PATCHv4 3/5] common: dma-mapping: Introduce common remapping functions Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 1:35 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 1:35 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 10:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-23 10:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-23 10:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-23 21:56 ` Laura Abbott [this message]
2014-07-23 21:56 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 21:56 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-24 13:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-24 13:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-24 13:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-23 11:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-23 11:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-23 11:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-23 1:35 ` [PATCHv4 4/5] arm: use genalloc for the atomic pool Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 1:35 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 1:35 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 1:35 ` [PATCHv4 5/5] arm64: Add atomic pool for non-coherent and CMA allocations Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 1:35 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 1:35 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-24 13:56 ` [PATCHv4 0/5] Atomic pool for arm64 Catalin Marinas
2014-07-24 13:56 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-24 13:56 ` Catalin Marinas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-07-02 18:03 [PATCHv4 0/5] DMA " Laura Abbott
2014-07-02 18:03 ` [PATCHv4 3/5] common: dma-mapping: Introduce common remapping functions Laura Abbott
2014-07-02 18:03 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-02 18:03 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-09 22:46 ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-09 22:46 ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-09 22:46 ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-18 14:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-18 14:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-18 14:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-18 13:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-18 13:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-18 13:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-21 19:33 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-21 19:33 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-21 19:33 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-22 16:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-22 16:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-22 16:04 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53D02F7B.5020309@codeaurora.org \
--to=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.