From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv4 3/5] common: dma-mapping: Introduce common remapping functions
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:04:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140722160408.GM2219@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53CD6B1C.2010801@codeaurora.org>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 08:33:48PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 7/18/2014 6:53 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 07:03:36PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >> +void *dma_common_pages_remap(struct page **pages, size_t size,
> >> + unsigned long vm_flags, pgprot_t prot,
> >> + const void *caller)
> >> +{
> >> + struct vm_struct *area;
> >> +
> >> + area = get_vm_area_caller(size, vm_flags, caller);
> >> + if (!area)
> >> + return NULL;
> >> +
> >> + if (map_vm_area(area, prot, &pages)) {
> >> + vunmap(area->addr);
> >> + return NULL;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return area->addr;
> >> +}
> >
> > Why not just replace this function with vmap()? It is nearly identical.
>
> With this version, the caller stored and printed via /proc/vmallocinfo
> is the actual caller of the DMA API whereas if we just call vmap we
> don't get any useful caller information. Going to vmap would change
> the existing behavior on ARM so it seems unwise to switch.
OK.
> Another option is to move this into vmalloc.c and add vmap_caller.
Maybe as a subsequent clean-up (once this series gets merged).
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
David Riley <davidriley@chromium.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Ritesh Harjain <ritesh.harjani@gmail.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 3/5] common: dma-mapping: Introduce common remapping functions
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:04:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140722160408.GM2219@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53CD6B1C.2010801@codeaurora.org>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 08:33:48PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 7/18/2014 6:53 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 07:03:36PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >> +void *dma_common_pages_remap(struct page **pages, size_t size,
> >> + unsigned long vm_flags, pgprot_t prot,
> >> + const void *caller)
> >> +{
> >> + struct vm_struct *area;
> >> +
> >> + area = get_vm_area_caller(size, vm_flags, caller);
> >> + if (!area)
> >> + return NULL;
> >> +
> >> + if (map_vm_area(area, prot, &pages)) {
> >> + vunmap(area->addr);
> >> + return NULL;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return area->addr;
> >> +}
> >
> > Why not just replace this function with vmap()? It is nearly identical.
>
> With this version, the caller stored and printed via /proc/vmallocinfo
> is the actual caller of the DMA API whereas if we just call vmap we
> don't get any useful caller information. Going to vmap would change
> the existing behavior on ARM so it seems unwise to switch.
OK.
> Another option is to move this into vmalloc.c and add vmap_caller.
Maybe as a subsequent clean-up (once this series gets merged).
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
David Riley <davidriley@chromium.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Ritesh Harjain <ritesh.harjani@gmail.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 3/5] common: dma-mapping: Introduce common remapping functions
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:04:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140722160408.GM2219@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53CD6B1C.2010801@codeaurora.org>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 08:33:48PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 7/18/2014 6:53 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 07:03:36PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >> +void *dma_common_pages_remap(struct page **pages, size_t size,
> >> + unsigned long vm_flags, pgprot_t prot,
> >> + const void *caller)
> >> +{
> >> + struct vm_struct *area;
> >> +
> >> + area = get_vm_area_caller(size, vm_flags, caller);
> >> + if (!area)
> >> + return NULL;
> >> +
> >> + if (map_vm_area(area, prot, &pages)) {
> >> + vunmap(area->addr);
> >> + return NULL;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return area->addr;
> >> +}
> >
> > Why not just replace this function with vmap()? It is nearly identical.
>
> With this version, the caller stored and printed via /proc/vmallocinfo
> is the actual caller of the DMA API whereas if we just call vmap we
> don't get any useful caller information. Going to vmap would change
> the existing behavior on ARM so it seems unwise to switch.
OK.
> Another option is to move this into vmalloc.c and add vmap_caller.
Maybe as a subsequent clean-up (once this series gets merged).
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-22 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-02 18:03 [PATCHv4 0/5] DMA Atomic pool for arm64 Laura Abbott
2014-07-02 18:03 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-02 18:03 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-02 18:03 ` [PATCHv4 1/5] lib/genalloc.c: Add power aligned algorithm Laura Abbott
2014-07-02 18:03 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-02 18:03 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-03 18:10 ` Will Deacon
2014-07-03 18:10 ` Will Deacon
2014-07-03 18:10 ` Will Deacon
2014-07-09 22:35 ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-09 22:35 ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-09 22:35 ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-02 18:03 ` [PATCHv4 2/5] lib/genalloc.c: Add genpool range check function Laura Abbott
2014-07-02 18:03 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-02 18:03 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-03 18:14 ` Will Deacon
2014-07-03 18:14 ` Will Deacon
2014-07-03 18:14 ` Will Deacon
2014-07-09 22:33 ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-09 22:33 ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-09 22:33 ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-21 19:51 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-21 19:51 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-21 19:51 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-22 15:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-22 15:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-22 15:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-02 18:03 ` [PATCHv4 3/5] common: dma-mapping: Introduce common remapping functions Laura Abbott
2014-07-02 18:03 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-02 18:03 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-09 22:46 ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-09 22:46 ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-09 22:46 ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-18 14:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-18 14:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-18 14:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-18 13:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-18 13:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-18 13:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-21 19:33 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-21 19:33 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-21 19:33 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-22 16:04 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2014-07-22 16:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-22 16:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-02 18:03 ` [PATCHv4 4/5] arm: use genalloc for the atomic pool Laura Abbott
2014-07-02 18:03 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-02 18:03 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-04 13:42 ` Thierry Reding
2014-07-04 13:42 ` Thierry Reding
2014-07-21 21:22 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-21 21:22 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-21 21:22 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-02 18:03 ` [PATCHv4 5/5] arm64: Add atomic pool for non-coherent and CMA allocations Laura Abbott
2014-07-02 18:03 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-02 18:03 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-04 13:35 ` Thierry Reding
2014-07-04 13:35 ` Thierry Reding
2014-07-21 22:00 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-21 22:00 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-21 22:00 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-18 13:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-18 13:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-18 13:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-21 22:36 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-21 22:36 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-21 22:36 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-22 15:56 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-22 15:56 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-22 15:56 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-22 18:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-22 18:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-22 18:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-22 21:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-22 21:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-22 21:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-22 23:51 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-22 23:51 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-22 23:51 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 11:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-23 11:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-23 11:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-07-23 1:35 [PATCHv4 0/5] Atomic pool for arm64 Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 1:35 ` [PATCHv4 3/5] common: dma-mapping: Introduce common remapping functions Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 1:35 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 1:35 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 10:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-23 10:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-23 10:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-23 21:56 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 21:56 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-23 21:56 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-24 13:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-24 13:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-24 13:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-23 11:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-23 11:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-23 11:16 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140722160408.GM2219@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.