From: riel@redhat.com (Rik van Riel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 00/12] sched: consolidation of cpu_capacity
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:52:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D69BE2.9010605@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406569906-9763-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2014 01:51 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> The usage_avg_contrib is based on the current implementation of
> the load avg tracking. I also have a version of the
> usage_avg_contrib that is based on the new implementation [3] but
> haven't provide the patches and results as [3] is still under
> review. I can provide change above [3] to change how
> usage_avg_contrib is computed and adapt to new mecanism.
>
> TODO: manage conflict with the next version of [4]
FWIW, your series makes sense to me, and only the first hunk of patch
8/12 looks like it would conflict with my patches, in that your patch
changes code that will only be reached in exceptional circumstances.
- --
All rights reversed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT1pviAAoJEM553pKExN6D4IoH/3Ou8H8kM5zhgDc4sDY5h+0F
qFDZIwdCWtKL36QfuZXIS/SXzikzs8XjxG7PIDj/sIEcpzs5jzGvlqAr/nTbQGlo
2ONnXobwSYSPbf8tEKrX4sdPS4YH1sd8+DgHC9TdYOgnWhdjpvfrwA9vFHmsZZvC
SxlLKCwqdWgtQPCJiGGJGdQOaB+OsNAJcoyo8OyokdOUrpMX30bfLT+8TiAiB/zS
uKrjzj3yZbrd/CRgpTSYopZgtzxHciZLLuIAurw7BJrUPL8Q1SL1HQ5eC5q/eS07
hXJrD6/o2DDfWoyeT2eDdJ9QkZKxT3vDKqC4WyVYn/2JZMzD5C+PY3XmQk7uYbU=
=zV+U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com, efault@gmx.de,
nicolas.pitre@linaro.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] sched: consolidation of cpu_capacity
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:52:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D69BE2.9010605@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406569906-9763-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2014 01:51 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> The usage_avg_contrib is based on the current implementation of
> the load avg tracking. I also have a version of the
> usage_avg_contrib that is based on the new implementation [3] but
> haven't provide the patches and results as [3] is still under
> review. I can provide change above [3] to change how
> usage_avg_contrib is computed and adapt to new mecanism.
>
> TODO: manage conflict with the next version of [4]
FWIW, your series makes sense to me, and only the first hunk of patch
8/12 looks like it would conflict with my patches, in that your patch
changes code that will only be reached in exceptional circumstances.
- --
All rights reversed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT1pviAAoJEM553pKExN6D4IoH/3Ou8H8kM5zhgDc4sDY5h+0F
qFDZIwdCWtKL36QfuZXIS/SXzikzs8XjxG7PIDj/sIEcpzs5jzGvlqAr/nTbQGlo
2ONnXobwSYSPbf8tEKrX4sdPS4YH1sd8+DgHC9TdYOgnWhdjpvfrwA9vFHmsZZvC
SxlLKCwqdWgtQPCJiGGJGdQOaB+OsNAJcoyo8OyokdOUrpMX30bfLT+8TiAiB/zS
uKrjzj3yZbrd/CRgpTSYopZgtzxHciZLLuIAurw7BJrUPL8Q1SL1HQ5eC5q/eS07
hXJrD6/o2DDfWoyeT2eDdJ9QkZKxT3vDKqC4WyVYn/2JZMzD5C+PY3XmQk7uYbU=
=zV+U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-28 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-28 17:51 [PATCH v4 00/12] sched: consolidation of cpu_capacity Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] sched: fix imbalance flag reset Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-23 10:25 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-23 10:25 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-24 10:31 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-24 10:31 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-24 23:47 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-24 23:47 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-25 9:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-25 9:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-25 10:13 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-25 10:13 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-07-28 17:51 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] sched: remove a wake_affine condition Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] sched: fix avg_load computation Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] sched: Allow all archs to set the capacity_orig Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] ARM: topology: use new cpu_capacity interface Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` [PATCH 06/12] sched: add per rq cpu_capacity_orig Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] sched: test the cpu's capacity in wake affine Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] sched: move cfs task on a CPU with higher capacity Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 18:43 ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-28 18:43 ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-29 7:40 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-29 7:40 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` [PATCH 09/12] sched: add usage_load_avg Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] sched: get CPU's utilization statistic Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] sched: replace capacity_factor by utilization Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] sched: add SD_PREFER_SIBLING for SMT level Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 17:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 18:52 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2014-07-28 18:52 ` [PATCH v4 00/12] sched: consolidation of cpu_capacity Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53D69BE2.9010605@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.