From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [sched/numa] a43455a1d57: +94.1% proc-vmstat.numa_hint_faults_local
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2014 00:17:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53DC6641.2050904@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53DC06FA.8030104@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1192 bytes --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/01/2014 05:30 PM, Jirka Hladky wrote:
> I see the regression only on this box. It has 4 "Ivy Bridge-EX"
> Xeon E7-4890 v2 CPUs.
>
> http://ark.intel.com/products/75251
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Xeon_microprocessors#.22Ivy_Bridge-EX.22_.2822_nm.29_Expandable_2
>
>
>
> Please rerun the test on box with Ivy Bridge CPUs. It seems that
> older CPU generations are not affected.
That would have been good info to know :)
I've been spending about a month trying to reproduce your issue on a
Westmere E7-4860.
Good thing I found all kinds of other scheduler issues along the way...
- --
All rights reversed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT3GZBAAoJEM553pKExN6D4FcH/2c/kYOZkbJeLBEWJHB0yWNR
tqI2Lt/qxPxOKADlDylJwj2Dq8R19Cc4tnJZAdPh+wgCivFefseQY0MI1TI8CO/Z
vEH+dCG8hokygFxKqAX9udI0MD1OxfTKKIk4fdjInZ632JG+JHnqVH6qWxBsriXD
151jzCR/zQEjg6gyCc8YsL06Q9YHyVv7dakggtRkYnE1GIUAtTDhFttRpNYoiVQQ
y/d32adq//PywTmsyWwJMu1ZGe1eGC57JBYzjoUo2iOlFQ9QR+fe4W2/6ZCbekwK
O8ZYbrJzDGrNQP2yDYd+o040KeVfzYkOtwz7+/40TYIvqFiuvKxEAxbJ32+krxA=
=XxCE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com>, Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkp@01.org, Hai Huang <hhuang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [sched/numa] a43455a1d57: +94.1% proc-vmstat.numa_hint_faults_local
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2014 00:17:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53DC6641.2050904@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53DC06FA.8030104@redhat.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/01/2014 05:30 PM, Jirka Hladky wrote:
> I see the regression only on this box. It has 4 "Ivy Bridge-EX"
> Xeon E7-4890 v2 CPUs.
>
> http://ark.intel.com/products/75251
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Xeon_microprocessors#.22Ivy_Bridge-EX.22_.2822_nm.29_Expandable_2
>
>
>
> Please rerun the test on box with Ivy Bridge CPUs. It seems that
> older CPU generations are not affected.
That would have been good info to know :)
I've been spending about a month trying to reproduce your issue on a
Westmere E7-4860.
Good thing I found all kinds of other scheduler issues along the way...
- --
All rights reversed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT3GZBAAoJEM553pKExN6D4FcH/2c/kYOZkbJeLBEWJHB0yWNR
tqI2Lt/qxPxOKADlDylJwj2Dq8R19Cc4tnJZAdPh+wgCivFefseQY0MI1TI8CO/Z
vEH+dCG8hokygFxKqAX9udI0MD1OxfTKKIk4fdjInZ632JG+JHnqVH6qWxBsriXD
151jzCR/zQEjg6gyCc8YsL06Q9YHyVv7dakggtRkYnE1GIUAtTDhFttRpNYoiVQQ
y/d32adq//PywTmsyWwJMu1ZGe1eGC57JBYzjoUo2iOlFQ9QR+fe4W2/6ZCbekwK
O8ZYbrJzDGrNQP2yDYd+o040KeVfzYkOtwz7+/40TYIvqFiuvKxEAxbJ32+krxA=
=XxCE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-02 4:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <53d70ee6.JsUEmW5dWsv8dev+%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
2014-07-29 5:24 ` [sched/numa] a43455a1d57: +94.1% proc-vmstat.numa_hint_faults_local Aaron Lu
2014-07-29 5:24 ` [LKP] " Aaron Lu
2014-07-29 6:39 ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-29 6:39 ` [LKP] " Rik van Riel
2014-07-29 8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29 8:17 ` [LKP] " Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29 20:04 ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-29 20:04 ` [LKP] " Rik van Riel
2014-07-30 2:14 ` Aaron Lu
2014-07-30 2:14 ` [LKP] " Aaron Lu
2014-07-30 14:25 ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-30 14:25 ` [LKP] " Rik van Riel
2014-07-31 5:04 ` Aaron Lu
2014-07-31 5:04 ` [LKP] " Aaron Lu
2014-07-31 6:22 ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-31 6:22 ` [LKP] " Rik van Riel
2014-07-31 6:53 ` Aaron Lu
2014-07-31 6:53 ` [LKP] " Aaron Lu
2014-07-31 6:42 ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-31 6:42 ` [LKP] " Rik van Riel
2014-08-05 21:43 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-05 21:43 ` [LKP] " Rik van Riel
2014-07-31 8:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-31 8:33 ` [LKP] " Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-31 8:56 ` Aaron Lu
2014-07-31 8:56 ` [LKP] " Aaron Lu
2014-07-31 10:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-31 10:42 ` [LKP] " Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-31 15:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-31 15:57 ` [LKP] " Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-31 16:16 ` Jirka Hladky
2014-07-31 16:16 ` [LKP] " Jirka Hladky
2014-07-31 16:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-31 16:27 ` [LKP] " Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-31 16:39 ` Jirka Hladky
2014-07-31 16:39 ` [LKP] " Jirka Hladky
2014-07-31 17:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-31 17:37 ` [LKP] " Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-01 15:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-01 15:02 ` [LKP] " Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-01 20:46 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-08-01 20:46 ` [LKP] " Davidlohr Bueso
2014-08-01 20:48 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-08-01 20:48 ` [LKP] " Davidlohr Bueso
2014-08-01 21:30 ` Jirka Hladky
2014-08-01 21:30 ` [LKP] " Jirka Hladky
2014-08-02 4:17 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2014-08-02 4:17 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-02 5:28 ` Jirka Hladky
2014-08-02 5:28 ` [LKP] " Jirka Hladky
2014-08-02 4:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-02 4:26 ` [LKP] " Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-01 0:18 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-08-01 0:18 ` [LKP] " Davidlohr Bueso
2014-08-01 2:03 ` Aaron Lu
2014-08-01 2:03 ` [LKP] " Aaron Lu
2014-08-01 4:03 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-08-01 4:03 ` [LKP] " Davidlohr Bueso
2014-08-01 7:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-01 7:29 ` [LKP] " Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-01 7:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-01 7:29 ` [LKP] " Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-31 23:58 ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-31 23:58 ` [LKP] " Yuyang Du
2014-08-01 8:14 ` Fengguang Wu
2014-08-01 8:14 ` [LKP] " Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53DC6641.2050904@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.