Will qoriq ppc developers require meta-fsl-arm?

Will qoriq ppc developers require meta-fsl-arm?

[Bob Cochran]

Working with my own image recipe for a QorIQ PPC build using the 
Community & Yocto repos.

I find I have some extra work to do once I include meta-fsl-demos but 
not meta-fsl-arm in my bblayers.conf since there are recipes inside of 
meta-fsl-demos that inherit classes from meta-fsl-arm (e.g., 
fsl-eula-unpack.bbclass).

Is the plan to have ppc developers include meta-fsl-arm in their layers 
definition (and vice-versa)?  I prefer to not do this.

Thanks

Bob

Re: Will qoriq ppc developers require meta-fsl-arm?

[Otavio Salvador]

Hello Bob,

On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Bob Cochran <yocto@mindchasers.com> wrote:
> Working with my own image recipe for a QorIQ PPC build using the Community &
> Yocto repos.
>
> I find I have some extra work to do once I include meta-fsl-demos but not
> meta-fsl-arm in my bblayers.conf since there are recipes inside of
> meta-fsl-demos that inherit classes from meta-fsl-arm (e.g.,
> fsl-eula-unpack.bbclass).
>
> Is the plan to have ppc developers include meta-fsl-arm in their layers
> definition (and vice-versa)?  I prefer to not do this.

This depends on what you want to use. The meta-fsl-ppc does not
require meta-fsl-arm.

The meta-fsl-demos expect the full FSL Community BSP layers to be
available so you do need to have meta-fsl-arm included. The goal of
demos is not to be self-contained but a set of demos for user
convenience.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750