Re: [PATCH 05/13] ARM: dts: DRA7: Add DCAN nodes

[Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>]

Hello.

On 9/8/2014 6:10 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:

> The SoC supports 2 DCAN nodes. Add them.

> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)

> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
> index 370009e..4ce1a4f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
[...]
> @@ -1267,6 +1269,34 @@
>   			ti,irqs-skip = <10 133 139 140>;
>   			ti,irqs-safe-map = <0>;
>   		};
> +
> +		dcan1: d_can@481cc000 {

    The ePAPR standard has something to say here:

 >>
The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function of the 
device and not its precise programming model. If appropriate, the name should 
be one of the following choices:

	• can
 >>

> +			compatible = "bosch,d_can";
> +			ti,hwmods = "dcan1";
> +			reg = <0x4ae3c000 0x2000>,
> +			      <0x558 0x4>; /* index to RAMINIT reg within syscon */
> +			raminit-syscon = <&dra7_ctrl_core>;
> +			raminit-start-bit = <3>;
> +			raminit-done-bit = <1>;
> +			raminit-pulse;

    Hm, aren't the above 4 properties vendor specific? If so, they should 
start with a vendor prefix and comma.

> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 222 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			clocks = <&dcan1_sys_clk_mux>;
> +			status = "disabled";
> +		};

WBR, Sergei