[PATCHv4 0/2] arm64 CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support

[PATCHv4 0/2] arm64 CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support

[Laura Abbott]

Hi,

This is another version of DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support for arm64.

Thanks,
Laura

v4: Switch to one function to do set/clear per suggestion of Will

v3: Addressed comments by Will/Steve


Laura Abbott (2):
  arm64: Introduce {set,clear}_pte_bit
  arm64: Add CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support

 arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug            | 11 +++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cacheflush.h |  4 ++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h    | 33 +++++++------
 arch/arm64/mm/Makefile              |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c            | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCHv4 1/2] arm64: Introduce {set,clear}_pte_bit

[Laura Abbott]

It's useful to be able to change individual bits in ptes at times.
Introduce functions for this and update existing pte_mk* functions
to use these primatives.

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index ffe1ba0..ca41449 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -149,46 +149,51 @@ extern struct page *empty_zero_page;
 #define pte_valid_not_user(pte) \
 	((pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_USER)) == PTE_VALID)
 
-static inline pte_t pte_wrprotect(pte_t pte)
+static pte_t clear_pte_bit(pte_t pte, pgprot_t prot)
 {
-	pte_val(pte) &= ~PTE_WRITE;
+	pte_val(pte) &= ~pgprot_val(prot);
 	return pte;
 }
 
-static inline pte_t pte_mkwrite(pte_t pte)
+static pte_t set_pte_bit(pte_t pte, pgprot_t prot)
 {
-	pte_val(pte) |= PTE_WRITE;
+	pte_val(pte) |= pgprot_val(prot);
 	return pte;
 }
 
+static inline pte_t pte_wrprotect(pte_t pte)
+{
+	return clear_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_WRITE));
+}
+
+static inline pte_t pte_mkwrite(pte_t pte)
+{
+	return set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_WRITE));
+}
+
 static inline pte_t pte_mkclean(pte_t pte)
 {
-	pte_val(pte) &= ~PTE_DIRTY;
-	return pte;
+	return clear_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_DIRTY));
 }
 
 static inline pte_t pte_mkdirty(pte_t pte)
 {
-	pte_val(pte) |= PTE_DIRTY;
-	return pte;
+	return set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_DIRTY));
 }
 
 static inline pte_t pte_mkold(pte_t pte)
 {
-	pte_val(pte) &= ~PTE_AF;
-	return pte;
+	return clear_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_AF));
 }
 
 static inline pte_t pte_mkyoung(pte_t pte)
 {
-	pte_val(pte) |= PTE_AF;
-	return pte;
+	return set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_AF));
 }
 
 static inline pte_t pte_mkspecial(pte_t pte)
 {
-	pte_val(pte) |= PTE_SPECIAL;
-	return pte;
+	return set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_SPECIAL));
 }
 
 static inline void set_pte(pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCHv4 1/2] arm64: Introduce {set,clear}_pte_bit

[Catalin Marinas]

On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 08:41:42PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index ffe1ba0..ca41449 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -149,46 +149,51 @@ extern struct page *empty_zero_page;
>  #define pte_valid_not_user(pte) \
>  	((pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_USER)) == PTE_VALID)
>  
> -static inline pte_t pte_wrprotect(pte_t pte)
> +static pte_t clear_pte_bit(pte_t pte, pgprot_t prot)
>  {
> -	pte_val(pte) &= ~PTE_WRITE;
> +	pte_val(pte) &= ~pgprot_val(prot);
>  	return pte;
>  }
>  
> -static inline pte_t pte_mkwrite(pte_t pte)
> +static pte_t set_pte_bit(pte_t pte, pgprot_t prot)
>  {
> -	pte_val(pte) |= PTE_WRITE;
> +	pte_val(pte) |= pgprot_val(prot);
>  	return pte;
>  }

Why these two functions don't have an "inline"?

-- 
Catalin

[PATCHv4 1/2] arm64: Introduce {set,clear}_pte_bit

[Laura Abbott]

On 8/26/2014 7:27 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 08:41:42PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> index ffe1ba0..ca41449 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> @@ -149,46 +149,51 @@ extern struct page *empty_zero_page;
>>  #define pte_valid_not_user(pte) \
>>  	((pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_USER)) == PTE_VALID)
>>  
>> -static inline pte_t pte_wrprotect(pte_t pte)
>> +static pte_t clear_pte_bit(pte_t pte, pgprot_t prot)
>>  {
>> -	pte_val(pte) &= ~PTE_WRITE;
>> +	pte_val(pte) &= ~pgprot_val(prot);
>>  	return pte;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static inline pte_t pte_mkwrite(pte_t pte)
>> +static pte_t set_pte_bit(pte_t pte, pgprot_t prot)
>>  {
>> -	pte_val(pte) |= PTE_WRITE;
>> +	pte_val(pte) |= pgprot_val(prot);
>>  	return pte;
>>  }
> 
> Why these two functions don't have an "inline"?
> 

That's an error on my part.

Will, you mentioned you applied these patches already, how
would you like to fix this up?

Laura

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCHv4 1/2] arm64: Introduce {set,clear}_pte_bit

[Will Deacon]

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:15:40PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 8/26/2014 7:27 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 08:41:42PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> >> index ffe1ba0..ca41449 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> >> @@ -149,46 +149,51 @@ extern struct page *empty_zero_page;
> >>  #define pte_valid_not_user(pte) \
> >>  	((pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_USER)) == PTE_VALID)
> >>  
> >> -static inline pte_t pte_wrprotect(pte_t pte)
> >> +static pte_t clear_pte_bit(pte_t pte, pgprot_t prot)
> >>  {
> >> -	pte_val(pte) &= ~PTE_WRITE;
> >> +	pte_val(pte) &= ~pgprot_val(prot);
> >>  	return pte;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> -static inline pte_t pte_mkwrite(pte_t pte)
> >> +static pte_t set_pte_bit(pte_t pte, pgprot_t prot)
> >>  {
> >> -	pte_val(pte) |= PTE_WRITE;
> >> +	pte_val(pte) |= pgprot_val(prot);
> >>  	return pte;
> >>  }
> > 
> > Why these two functions don't have an "inline"?
> > 
> 
> That's an error on my part.
> 
> Will, you mentioned you applied these patches already, how
> would you like to fix this up?

Yup, I can easily add the missing inline keywords. Did you see Catalin's
other comment? It looks like we're missing a '-1' on the end address before
checking whether or not it sits in a module. If you confirm, I can add that
too.

Will

[PATCHv4 1/2] arm64: Introduce {set,clear}_pte_bit

[Laura Abbott]

On 8/27/2014 1:07 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:15:40PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> On 8/26/2014 7:27 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 08:41:42PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>>> index ffe1ba0..ca41449 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>>> @@ -149,46 +149,51 @@ extern struct page *empty_zero_page;
>>>>   #define pte_valid_not_user(pte) \
>>>>   	((pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_USER)) == PTE_VALID)
>>>>
>>>> -static inline pte_t pte_wrprotect(pte_t pte)
>>>> +static pte_t clear_pte_bit(pte_t pte, pgprot_t prot)
>>>>   {
>>>> -	pte_val(pte) &= ~PTE_WRITE;
>>>> +	pte_val(pte) &= ~pgprot_val(prot);
>>>>   	return pte;
>>>>   }
>>>>
>>>> -static inline pte_t pte_mkwrite(pte_t pte)
>>>> +static pte_t set_pte_bit(pte_t pte, pgprot_t prot)
>>>>   {
>>>> -	pte_val(pte) |= PTE_WRITE;
>>>> +	pte_val(pte) |= pgprot_val(prot);
>>>>   	return pte;
>>>>   }
>>>
>>> Why these two functions don't have an "inline"?
>>>
>>
>> That's an error on my part.
>>
>> Will, you mentioned you applied these patches already, how
>> would you like to fix this up?
>
> Yup, I can easily add the missing inline keywords. Did you see Catalin's
> other comment? It looks like we're missing a '-1' on the end address before
> checking whether or not it sits in a module. If you confirm, I can add that
> too.
>
> Will
>

Yes, Catalin's review was correct, we need the -1 as well.

Thanks,
Laura

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCHv4 2/2] arm64: Add CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support

[Laura Abbott]

In a similar fashion to other architecture, add the infrastructure
and Kconfig to enable DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support. When
enabled, module ranges will be marked read-only/no-execute as
appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug            | 11 +++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cacheflush.h |  4 ++
 arch/arm64/mm/Makefile              |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c            | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug
index 4ee8e90..0a12933 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug
@@ -43,4 +43,15 @@ config ARM64_RANDOMIZE_TEXT_OFFSET
 	  of TEXT_OFFSET and platforms must not require a specific
 	  value.
 
+config DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX
+        bool "Set loadable kernel module data as NX and text as RO"
+        depends on MODULES
+        help
+          This option helps catch unintended modifications to loadable
+          kernel module's text and read-only data. It also prevents execution
+          of module data. Such protection may interfere with run-time code
+          patching and dynamic kernel tracing - and they might also protect
+          against certain classes of kernel exploits.
+          If in doubt, say "N".
+
 endmenu
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cacheflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cacheflush.h
index f2defe1..689b637 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cacheflush.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cacheflush.h
@@ -148,4 +148,8 @@ static inline void flush_cache_vunmap(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 {
 }
 
+int set_memory_ro(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
+int set_memory_rw(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
+int set_memory_x(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
+int set_memory_nx(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
index 3ecb56c..c56179e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 obj-y				:= dma-mapping.o extable.o fault.o init.o \
 				   cache.o copypage.o flush.o \
 				   ioremap.o mmap.o pgd.o mmu.o \
-				   context.o proc.o
+				   context.o proc.o pageattr.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE)	+= hugetlbpage.o
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c66b897
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2014, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 and
+ * only version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ */
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+
+#include <asm/pgtable.h>
+#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
+
+struct page_change_data {
+	pgprot_t set_mask;
+	pgprot_t clear_mask;
+};
+
+static int change_page_range(pte_t *ptep, pgtable_t token, unsigned long addr,
+			void *data)
+{
+	struct page_change_data *cdata = data;
+	pte_t pte = *ptep;
+
+	pte = clear_pte_bit(pte, cdata->clear_mask);
+	pte = set_pte_bit(pte, cdata->set_mask);
+
+	set_pte(ptep, pte);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
+				pgprot_t set_mask, pgprot_t clear_mask)
+{
+	unsigned long start = addr;
+	unsigned long size = PAGE_SIZE*numpages;
+	unsigned long end = start + size;
+	int ret;
+	struct page_change_data data;
+
+	if (!IS_ALIGNED(addr, PAGE_SIZE)) {
+		addr &= PAGE_MASK;
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+	}
+
+	if (!is_module_address(start) || !is_module_address(end))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	data.set_mask = set_mask;
+	data.clear_mask = clear_mask;
+
+	ret = apply_to_page_range(&init_mm, start, size, change_page_range,
+					&data);
+
+	flush_tlb_kernel_range(start, end);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+int set_memory_ro(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
+{
+	return change_memory_common(addr, numpages,
+					__pgprot(PTE_RDONLY),
+					__pgprot(PTE_WRITE));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(set_memory_ro);
+
+int set_memory_rw(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
+{
+	return change_memory_common(addr, numpages,
+					__pgprot(PTE_WRITE),
+					__pgprot(PTE_RDONLY));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(set_memory_rw);
+
+int set_memory_nx(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
+{
+	return change_memory_common(addr, numpages,
+					__pgprot(PTE_PXN),
+					__pgprot(0));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(set_memory_nx);
+
+int set_memory_x(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
+{
+	return change_memory_common(addr, numpages,
+					__pgprot(0),
+					__pgprot(PTE_PXN));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(set_memory_x);
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCHv4 2/2] arm64: Add CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support

[Catalin Marinas]

On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 08:41:43PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
[...]
> +static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
> +				pgprot_t set_mask, pgprot_t clear_mask)
> +{
> +	unsigned long start = addr;
> +	unsigned long size = PAGE_SIZE*numpages;
> +	unsigned long end = start + size;
> +	int ret;
> +	struct page_change_data data;
> +
> +	if (!IS_ALIGNED(addr, PAGE_SIZE)) {
> +		addr &= PAGE_MASK;
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!is_module_address(start) || !is_module_address(end))
> +		return -EINVAL;

Minor thing, "end" is exclusive here. Do you still get the right check
with is_module_address(end)?

-- 
Catalin

[PATCHv4 2/2] arm64: Add CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support

[Laura Abbott]

On 8/26/2014 7:40 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 08:41:43PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
> [...]
>> +static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
>> +				pgprot_t set_mask, pgprot_t clear_mask)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long start = addr;
>> +	unsigned long size = PAGE_SIZE*numpages;
>> +	unsigned long end = start + size;
>> +	int ret;
>> +	struct page_change_data data;
>> +
>> +	if (!IS_ALIGNED(addr, PAGE_SIZE)) {
>> +		addr &= PAGE_MASK;
>> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (!is_module_address(start) || !is_module_address(end))
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>
> Minor thing, "end" is exclusive here. Do you still get the right check
> with is_module_address(end)?
>

No, You are correct. I'll talk to Will to get that fixed up.

Thanks,
Laura

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCHv4 2/2] arm64: Add CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support

[Will Deacon]

On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 04:42:20PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 8/26/2014 7:40 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 08:41:43PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
> > [...]
> >> +static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
> >> +				pgprot_t set_mask, pgprot_t clear_mask)
> >> +{
> >> +	unsigned long start = addr;
> >> +	unsigned long size = PAGE_SIZE*numpages;
> >> +	unsigned long end = start + size;
> >> +	int ret;
> >> +	struct page_change_data data;
> >> +
> >> +	if (!IS_ALIGNED(addr, PAGE_SIZE)) {
> >> +		addr &= PAGE_MASK;
> >> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	if (!is_module_address(start) || !is_module_address(end))
> >> +		return -EINVAL;
> >
> > Minor thing, "end" is exclusive here. Do you still get the right check
> > with is_module_address(end)?
> >
> 
> No, You are correct. I'll talk to Will to get that fixed up.

I already had a crack at fixing it:

  https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/commit/?h=devel&id=a8b974874c4770860c2a356adb9397d38f6c2b70

How did I do?

Will

[PATCHv4 2/2] arm64: Add CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support

[Zi Shen Lim]

Hi Will,

On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 04:42:20PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> On 8/26/2014 7:40 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 08:41:43PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> >> --- /dev/null
>> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
>> > [...]
>> >> +static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
>> >> +                          pgprot_t set_mask, pgprot_t clear_mask)
>> >> +{
>> >> +  unsigned long start = addr;
>> >> +  unsigned long size = PAGE_SIZE*numpages;
>> >> +  unsigned long end = start + size;
>> >> +  int ret;
>> >> +  struct page_change_data data;
>> >> +
>> >> +  if (!IS_ALIGNED(addr, PAGE_SIZE)) {
>> >> +          addr &= PAGE_MASK;

I don't see any uses of addr after this.
Perhaps we also meant to compute start and end?

>> >> +          WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>> >> +  }
>> >> +
>> >> +  if (!is_module_address(start) || !is_module_address(end))
>> >> +          return -EINVAL;
>> >
>> > Minor thing, "end" is exclusive here. Do you still get the right check
>> > with is_module_address(end)?
>> >
>>
>> No, You are correct. I'll talk to Will to get that fixed up.
>
> I already had a crack at fixing it:
>
>   https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/commit/?h=devel&id=a8b974874c4770860c2a356adb9397d38f6c2b70
>
> How did I do?
>
> Will
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCHv4 2/2] arm64: Add CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support

[Will Deacon]

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:58:01AM +0100, Zi Shen Lim wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 04:42:20PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >> On 8/26/2014 7:40 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 08:41:43PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >> >> --- /dev/null
> >> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
> >> > [...]
> >> >> +static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
> >> >> +                          pgprot_t set_mask, pgprot_t clear_mask)
> >> >> +{
> >> >> +  unsigned long start = addr;
> >> >> +  unsigned long size = PAGE_SIZE*numpages;
> >> >> +  unsigned long end = start + size;
> >> >> +  int ret;
> >> >> +  struct page_change_data data;
> >> >> +
> >> >> +  if (!IS_ALIGNED(addr, PAGE_SIZE)) {
> >> >> +          addr &= PAGE_MASK;
> 
> I don't see any uses of addr after this.
> Perhaps we also meant to compute start and end?


Actually, I think the alignment fixup should just be performed directly on
start, but this is Laura's code so it would be good if she could confirm.

Laura -- what's the right thing to do here? (sending a fix patch would be
ideal :)

Will

[PATCHv4 2/2] arm64: Add CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support

[Laura Abbott]

On 9/10/2014 1:47 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:58:01AM +0100, Zi Shen Lim wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 04:42:20PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>>> On 8/26/2014 7:40 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 08:41:43PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>> +static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
>>>>>> +                          pgprot_t set_mask, pgprot_t clear_mask)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +  unsigned long start = addr;
>>>>>> +  unsigned long size = PAGE_SIZE*numpages;
>>>>>> +  unsigned long end = start + size;
>>>>>> +  int ret;
>>>>>> +  struct page_change_data data;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +  if (!IS_ALIGNED(addr, PAGE_SIZE)) {
>>>>>> +          addr &= PAGE_MASK;
>>
>> I don't see any uses of addr after this.
>> Perhaps we also meant to compute start and end?
>
>
> Actually, I think the alignment fixup should just be performed directly on
> start, but this is Laura's code so it would be good if she could confirm.
>
> Laura -- what's the right thing to do here? (sending a fix patch would be
> ideal :)
>
> Will
>

Yes this needs to be fixed. I'll send a patch out tomorrow.

Thanks,
Laura

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCH] arm64: pageattr: Correctly adjust unaligned start addresses

[Laura Abbott]

The start address needs to be actually updated after it
is detected to be unaligned. Adjust it and the end address
properly.

Reported-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
index 75e744e..bb0ea94 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
@@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
 	struct page_change_data data;
 
 	if (!IS_ALIGNED(addr, PAGE_SIZE)) {
-		addr &= PAGE_MASK;
+		start &= PAGE_MASK;
+		end = start + size;
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
 	}
 
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCH] arm64: pageattr: Correctly adjust unaligned start addresses

[Z Lim]

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> The start address needs to be actually updated after it
> is detected to be unaligned. Adjust it and the end address
> properly.
>
> Reported-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
> index 75e744e..bb0ea94 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
> @@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
>         struct page_change_data data;
>
>         if (!IS_ALIGNED(addr, PAGE_SIZE)) {
> -               addr &= PAGE_MASK;
> +               start &= PAGE_MASK;
> +               end = start + size;
>                 WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>         }
>

Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>

> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> hosted by The Linux Foundation
>

[PATCH] arm64: pageattr: Correctly adjust unaligned start addresses

[Catalin Marinas]

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:10:32PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
> The start address needs to be actually updated after it
> is detected to be unaligned. Adjust it and the end address
> properly.
> 
> Reported-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Applied. Thanks.

-- 
Catalin

[PATCHv4 0/2] arm64 CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support

[Will Deacon]

On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 08:41:41PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
> This is another version of DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support for arm64.
> 
> Thanks,
> Laura
> 
> v4: Switch to one function to do set/clear per suggestion of Will

Thanks Laura. It looks like you addressed all the comments I made after you
sent this too, so I've applied it to our devel branch for the moment.

Cheers,

Will