From: Zefan Li <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
Tetsuo Handa
<penguin-kernel-JPay3/Yim36HaxMnTkn67Xf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] sched: add a macro to define bitops for task atomic flags
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:51:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <541F9CD4.5040407@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <541F9C96.10705-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
This will simplify code when we add new flags.
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 20 +++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 4557765..04a2ae2 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1959,15 +1959,17 @@ static inline void memalloc_noio_restore(unsigned int flags)
/* Per-process atomic flags. */
#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0 /* May not gain new privileges. */
-static inline bool task_no_new_privs(struct task_struct *p)
-{
- return test_bit(PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS, &p->atomic_flags);
-}
-
-static inline void task_set_no_new_privs(struct task_struct *p)
-{
- set_bit(PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS, &p->atomic_flags);
-}
+#define TASK_PFA_BITOPS(name, func) \
+static inline bool task_##func(struct task_struct *p) \
+{ return test_bit(PFA_##name, &p->atomic_flags); } \
+ \
+static inline void task_set_##func(struct task_struct *p) \
+{ set_bit(PFA_##name, &p->atomic_flags); } \
+ \
+static inline void task_clear_##func(struct task_struct *p) \
+{ clear_bit(PFA_##name, &p->atomic_flags); }
+
+TASK_PFA_BITOPS(NO_NEW_PRIVS, no_new_privs)
/*
* task->jobctl flags
--
1.8.0.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, <keescook@chromium.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] sched: add a macro to define bitops for task atomic flags
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:51:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <541F9CD4.5040407@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <541F9C96.10705@huawei.com>
This will simplify code when we add new flags.
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 20 +++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 4557765..04a2ae2 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1959,15 +1959,17 @@ static inline void memalloc_noio_restore(unsigned int flags)
/* Per-process atomic flags. */
#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0 /* May not gain new privileges. */
-static inline bool task_no_new_privs(struct task_struct *p)
-{
- return test_bit(PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS, &p->atomic_flags);
-}
-
-static inline void task_set_no_new_privs(struct task_struct *p)
-{
- set_bit(PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS, &p->atomic_flags);
-}
+#define TASK_PFA_BITOPS(name, func) \
+static inline bool task_##func(struct task_struct *p) \
+{ return test_bit(PFA_##name, &p->atomic_flags); } \
+ \
+static inline void task_set_##func(struct task_struct *p) \
+{ set_bit(PFA_##name, &p->atomic_flags); } \
+ \
+static inline void task_clear_##func(struct task_struct *p) \
+{ clear_bit(PFA_##name, &p->atomic_flags); }
+
+TASK_PFA_BITOPS(NO_NEW_PRIVS, no_new_privs)
/*
* task->jobctl flags
--
1.8.0.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-22 3:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-22 3:50 [PATCH 1/3] sched: fix confusing PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS constant Zefan Li
2014-09-22 3:50 ` Zefan Li
[not found] ` <541F9C96.10705-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-22 3:51 ` Zefan Li [this message]
2014-09-22 3:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched: add a macro to define bitops for task atomic flags Zefan Li
[not found] ` <541F9CD4.5040407-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-22 11:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-22 11:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-22 4:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched: fix confusing PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS constant Tejun Heo
2014-09-22 4:02 ` Tejun Heo
2014-09-22 4:44 ` Zefan Li
2014-09-22 4:44 ` Zefan Li
2014-09-22 3:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpuset: PF_SPREAD_PAGE and PF_SPREAD_SLAB should be atomic flags Zefan Li
2014-09-22 3:52 ` Zefan Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=541F9CD4.5040407@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan-hv44wf8li93qt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mingo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel-JPay3/Yim36HaxMnTkn67Xf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org \
--cc=peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.