From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozłowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] regulator: Remove unnecessary ena_gpio initializations
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:52:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5433A9CD.8090007@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412626635-7404-6-git-send-email-mpa@pengutronix.de>
On 06.10.2014 22:17, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> It is not necessary to setup config.ena_gpio with -EINVAL or similar.
> This patch removes these unnecessary initializations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c | 1 -
> drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
> index c879dff597ee..d7455ee309bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
> @@ -509,7 +509,6 @@ static int pfuze100_regulator_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> config.init_data = init_data;
> config.driver_data = pfuze_chip;
> config.of_node = match_of_node(i);
> - config.ena_gpio = -EINVAL;
>
> pfuze_chip->regulators[i] =
> devm_regulator_register(&client->dev, desc, &config);
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c b/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c
> index d258e6613831..2c7817f12516 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c
> @@ -949,8 +949,6 @@ static int s5m8767_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> config.driver_data = s5m8767;
> config.regmap = iodev->regmap_pmic;
> config.of_node = pdata->regulators[i].reg_node;
> - config.ena_gpio = -EINVAL;
> - config.ena_gpio_flags = 0;
> if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->regulators[i].ext_control_gpio))
> s5m8767_regulator_config_ext_control(s5m8767,
> &pdata->regulators[i], &config);
This would bring back problem with carried over ena_gpio (commit
f4fbb3ce342bc1 "regulator: s5m8767: Fix carried over ena_gpio assignment").
The "config" is re-used in loop for next regulators. This means that the
"config.ena_gpio" has to be set here to prevent using the same value for
next regulator.
I think these lines shouldn't be removed.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Krzysztof Kozłowski" <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] regulator: Remove unnecessary ena_gpio initializations
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:52:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5433A9CD.8090007@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412626635-7404-6-git-send-email-mpa@pengutronix.de>
On 06.10.2014 22:17, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> It is not necessary to setup config.ena_gpio with -EINVAL or similar.
> This patch removes these unnecessary initializations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c | 1 -
> drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
> index c879dff597ee..d7455ee309bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
> @@ -509,7 +509,6 @@ static int pfuze100_regulator_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> config.init_data = init_data;
> config.driver_data = pfuze_chip;
> config.of_node = match_of_node(i);
> - config.ena_gpio = -EINVAL;
>
> pfuze_chip->regulators[i] =
> devm_regulator_register(&client->dev, desc, &config);
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c b/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c
> index d258e6613831..2c7817f12516 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c
> @@ -949,8 +949,6 @@ static int s5m8767_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> config.driver_data = s5m8767;
> config.regmap = iodev->regmap_pmic;
> config.of_node = pdata->regulators[i].reg_node;
> - config.ena_gpio = -EINVAL;
> - config.ena_gpio_flags = 0;
> if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->regulators[i].ext_control_gpio))
> s5m8767_regulator_config_ext_control(s5m8767,
> &pdata->regulators[i], &config);
This would bring back problem with carried over ena_gpio (commit
f4fbb3ce342bc1 "regulator: s5m8767: Fix carried over ena_gpio assignment").
The "config" is re-used in loop for next regulators. This means that the
"config.ena_gpio" has to be set here to prevent using the same value for
next regulator.
I think these lines shouldn't be removed.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-07 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-06 20:17 [PATCH 0/5] regulator: Fix core behaviour for gpio 0 Markus Pargmann
2014-10-06 20:17 ` Markus Pargmann
2014-10-06 20:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] regulator: Add ena_gpio_valid config Markus Pargmann
2014-10-06 20:17 ` Markus Pargmann
2014-10-07 11:53 ` Mark Brown
2014-10-07 11:53 ` Mark Brown
2014-10-07 13:03 ` Markus Pargmann
2014-10-07 13:03 ` Markus Pargmann
2014-10-07 16:19 ` Mark Brown
2014-10-07 16:19 ` Mark Brown
2014-10-07 19:18 ` Markus Pargmann
2014-10-07 19:18 ` Markus Pargmann
2014-10-06 20:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] regulator: Set ena_gpio_valid in regulator drivers Markus Pargmann
2014-10-06 20:17 ` Markus Pargmann
2014-10-07 8:46 ` Krzysztof Kozłowski
2014-10-07 8:46 ` Krzysztof Kozłowski
2014-10-07 9:10 ` Markus Pargmann
2014-10-07 9:10 ` Markus Pargmann
2014-10-07 11:58 ` Mark Brown
2014-10-07 11:58 ` Mark Brown
2014-10-07 13:05 ` Markus Pargmann
2014-10-07 13:05 ` Markus Pargmann
2014-10-06 20:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] regulator: Fix ena_gpio check Markus Pargmann
2014-10-06 20:17 ` Markus Pargmann
2014-10-06 20:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] regulator: Use gpio_is_valid Markus Pargmann
2014-10-06 20:17 ` Markus Pargmann
2014-10-07 12:01 ` Mark Brown
2014-10-07 12:01 ` Mark Brown
2014-10-07 13:07 ` Markus Pargmann
2014-10-07 13:07 ` Markus Pargmann
2014-10-07 16:20 ` Mark Brown
2014-10-07 16:20 ` Mark Brown
2014-10-06 20:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] regulator: Remove unnecessary ena_gpio initializations Markus Pargmann
2014-10-06 20:17 ` Markus Pargmann
2014-10-07 8:52 ` Krzysztof Kozłowski [this message]
2014-10-07 8:52 ` Krzysztof Kozłowski
2014-10-07 9:14 ` Markus Pargmann
2014-10-07 9:14 ` Markus Pargmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5433A9CD.8090007@samsung.com \
--to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.