From: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, bruce.w.allan@intel.com,
qat-linux@intel.com, john.griffin@intel.com,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, naleksan@redhat.com,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] crypto: qat - Enforce valid numa configuration.
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 16:12:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5437165E.6030008@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54370163.6040305@redhat.com>
On 10/09/2014 02:42 PM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> > I don't think cpu hotplug matters here. This is one (probe) time
>> > determination if the configuration is optimal or not and if it makes
>> > sense to use this accelerator or not.
> It absolutely matters. num_online_cpus() *changes* depending on the # of cpus.
Sure, but I still think that we are safe here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-09 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-08 17:38 [PATCH 0/2] crypto: qat - Fix for invalid dma mapping and numa Tadeusz Struk
2014-10-08 17:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] crypto: qat - Prevent dma mapping zero length assoc data Tadeusz Struk
2014-10-08 17:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] crypto: qat - Enforce valid numa configuration Tadeusz Struk
2014-10-08 17:57 ` Prarit Bhargava
2014-10-08 18:11 ` Tadeusz Struk
2014-10-08 18:35 ` Prarit Bhargava
2014-10-08 18:57 ` Tadeusz Struk
2014-10-08 19:01 ` Prarit Bhargava
2014-10-08 19:25 ` Tadeusz Struk
2014-10-09 11:23 ` Prarit Bhargava
2014-10-09 16:14 ` Tadeusz Struk
2014-10-09 17:32 ` Prarit Bhargava
2014-10-09 19:55 ` Tadeusz Struk
2014-10-09 21:42 ` Prarit Bhargava
2014-10-09 23:12 ` Tadeusz Struk [this message]
2014-10-10 11:23 ` Prarit Bhargava
2014-10-10 13:25 ` Tadeusz Struk
2014-10-10 22:15 ` Prarit Bhargava
2014-10-11 17:05 ` Tadeusz Struk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5437165E.6030008@intel.com \
--to=tadeusz.struk@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=john.griffin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=naleksan@redhat.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=qat-linux@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.